Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392238
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:48:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <57D84A27.406C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:49:11 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: all people are computer simulations |
| References | <57D5C1B7.4D5C@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 56 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-7DeCojQ3HboIEQkWUv0MV0o0OmDebk4RoJ8DbcBU0pwlit6RFbl6R3FcZ7+wOdg7iG9cwoNh8hdgVHm!WQ9PVnXstmgjaa6LxcVc+Jr51zRR6ecsfOUUpp/SKBumLctboqjoYM7OJWxWlkHhU49lbBzPVfLY!8X2L9iQLXb0= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2667 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:451272 sci.physics:596827 sci.physics.relativity:392238 sci.math:345434 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
in today's news...
Bank of America analysts claim there's a 50% chance we live in a 'Matrix
reality simulation'
12:49, 13 Sep 2016
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/bank-america-analysts-claim-theres-8823425
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I hesitate to publish my findings..
> that all people are computer simulations, because
> you will never look at people the same way again.
>
> People have two illusions.
>
> The regular illusion you're familiar with, and
> the optical illusion.
>
> The 'regular illusion' is much stronger than
> the 'optical illusion'.
>
> The 'regular illusion' is...that people are just
> highly complicated machines.
>
> You look at your girlfriend (or girlfriend experience)
> and you see the illusion..that she is just a machine.
>
> A very highly complicated machines, a robot..
> built in the form of a woman.
>
> Ask your girlfriend, "What's your name?"
>
> Of course she doesn't have the nuts and bolts,
> with wires, built in motherboard and things like that..
>
> but she has a face, Why? She's covered with flesh...
> she's a lie....an illusion.
>
> But the illusion goes away when she ..smiles.
>
> Now...the 'optical illusion'...I hesitate to publish because
> once I reveal to you the 'optical illusion'...it will not
> go away with a smile. They will be seen as zeros and ones.
>
> But to demonstrate that all people are computer simulations means
> I have to publish...the 'optical illusion'.
>
> That is something I have to think about...like a responsible hacker.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 13:42 -0700
all people are computer simulations "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-11 14:02 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 16:59 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 11:49 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 11:59 -0700
Re: all people are computer simulations Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-09-13 13:40 -0600
csiph-web