Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380929
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 05 Apr 2016 01:52:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <570360EC.5B3D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2016 23:53:32 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Observer in the double slit experiment |
| References | <3db665d0-c9d3-4050-a5ee-1f5695979193@googlegroups.com> <a826e42a-57e4-4ae2-8355-f6a99b1b9e92@googlegroups.com> <boKdnWlzh4vrs57KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <dmgrckF4ssuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 24 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-h6VXg+X2GLKh9pMCsQUIFA6Uwp87YfOTHSTL0UzX4D6q5ZFyDeONHcbA6iEFIjWs56AE1SAfEdvbuO/!U2sDmDJQ8tm+ya12/IVTGRVTxYFmzESBXI+5Zvwi5Yq3BWwgF0zFclSVxbB0nChkvMCInOXRiqQL!9y5ZqaiLRRs= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1890 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:380929 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 5/04/2016 1:18 PM, Tom Roberts wrote: > > On 4/4/16 4/4/16 - 12:56 PM, Adrian Ferent wrote: > >> No physicist tried in the last 100 years this experiment! > > > > Why do you just make stuff up and pretend it is true? > > > > There have been numerous repetitions of this experiment in the past > > decade, and even the original experiment with electrons falls within > > your "past 100 years". There have been many more instances of > > closely-related experiments. > > > > > > Tom Roberts > > > > Indeed, it's even been done with neutrons. > > Sylvia. how about 'machine gun bullets'??? Has it been done with 'machine gun bullets'?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 05:48 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 06:45 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-04-04 06:56 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:11 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:07 -0500
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:56 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:53 -0500
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-04 22:18 -0500
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-05 13:57 +1000
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:47 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:57 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:19 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:31 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 11:55 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 11:15 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:59 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:27 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:48 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:19 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:27 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:41 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:04 -0700
Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:25 -0700
csiph-web