Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377900

Re: unlock a phone

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 04 Mar 2016 13:27:20 -0600
Message-ID <56D9E192.41AB@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:27:14 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.2600, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: unlock a phone
References <56D088CF.6970@ix.netcom.com> <56D13D4C.AD@ix.netcom.com> <56D494F2.30C5@ix.netcom.com> <djkgdgFu4f0U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 10
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-DgUjFyHM4IwX6do9G7Vma/USENpogp/tdmdoGsHRBu4Hp81VNt58d9Tm4/tYy9EZhIFWHmuoLuGdlnD!UAV45gG3FJgo5Ie5PEFDOozLwxvw1A9oL4Wraj7ecg3+guoJUx1uMMuHEVNJ6vwQiwWbjzOFGbKE!dNo/DVhn9w==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1741
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:434641 alt.astronomy:282640 sci.physics:559286 sci.physics.relativity:377900

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Even if the Justice Department loses its legal showdown with Apple Inc.
over access to a killer’s iPhone, the government might still be able to
extract the data locked away inside it, computer-security experts say.
But it would be risky, expensive and time-consuming.

Those experts say officials could try to physically crack open the A6
microprocessor inside the phone of Syed Rizwan Farook, targeting the
portion of the chip that holds the user ID, or UID, key. With the key,
officials could move the iPhone’s scrambled data to another computer and
quickly unlock it.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 09:18 -0800
  Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:08 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 14:25 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500
          Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
        Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:27 -0800
          Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:28 -0800
            Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:29 -0800
              Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 14:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:55 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 -0800
  Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 12:08 +1100
    Re: unloock a phone Emigdio Sophronius <emigg@augustvisitors.org> - 2016-02-28 14:09 +0000
    Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 06:10 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-29 11:24 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 16:50 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-29 19:52 +0000
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 23:30 +0800
    Re: [OT] FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2016-02-28 10:56 -0500
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 00:10 +0800
    Re: [OT] Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 17:53 -0500
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:17 +0800
    Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 19:59 -0800
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:19 +0800
        Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 14:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:53 +0800
            Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:16 -0800
              Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:46 +0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:24 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
  [OT] Go misc.phone.mobile.iphone "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:58 +0800
  Re: unloock a phone, NO< its about them unlocking everyone's phones tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700

csiph-web