Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376598
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:23:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <56C8149D.47A6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:24:13 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: GRAVITY... |
| References | <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 60 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 162.239.141.5 |
| X-Trace | sv3-uvCsRfKJk7SCW7IjhkeM3OcQi3PN62K1tw/M1k+6N0TluCcvaOTSy5UnsBf1ZbfsV7QmutiKfNW+YqV!A2ZsJehniG2guKGBN6OyOXId0p36YVEEA6hf+/gl3OioDbAfnKvOOX21WFU/YJrtZlFG6XCHnpFr!cXJuaij+mA== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2736 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2848 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3545835171 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433668 alt.astronomy:282311 sci.physics:554864 sci.physics.relativity:376598 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist > > > > You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut, > > therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen > > into helium, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question. > > You have no evidence that gravity exist. > > I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory? > > : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory > > I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No?? > > or > > Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir? > > Ja or nien? Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because... the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer. Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer. Are there aliens on other planets? No. Is there water on Mars? No. Are we alone. Yes. Is there a God? You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no... Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:29 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:00 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 05:33 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000
csiph-web