Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358435
| Message-ID | <55B12F3D.1AE9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-23 11:15 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: It's About Time |
| References | <55AEE6BD.1399@ix.netcom.com> <moms7l$jv8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <55AF0AFD.500F@ix.netcom.com> <moqqa8$kk5$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Simeom wrote: > > On 7/21/2015 10:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Simeom wrote: > >> > >> On 7/21/2015 7:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Now let me explain > >>> how this Clock thing > >>> works... > >> > >> OK !! I am READY !! > >> > >>> > >>> If you got two > >>> clocks, and one is > >>> slower > >>> and the other > >>> is faster.... > > >> usally a small speed adjustment is all that is needed, perhaps both > >> clocks, get a short wave radio and tune to 10MHz and listen for the > >> ticking, no problem > >> > >>> > >>> the one that is faster > >>> is in the future... > >>> and the other one > >>> is running slow because > >>> it's in the past. > > >> can you see the one in the future, or will someone move it ? > >> > >> can you see the one in the past? or is it gone ? > >> > >>> > >>> The clock in the north > >>> pole is the future clock.. > >>> and the clock in the south > >>> is the clock in the past. > > >> south pole ? > >> > >> both those places are very cold, and if your clocks are pendulem types > >> they may still be off due to being at the pole and rotating around. > >> > > >>> If you're standing > >>> on the north pole.. > >>> and your twin is in > >>> the south pole... > >>> your twin at the > >>> north pole is > >>> getting older > >>> faster than your > >>> twin in the > >>> south pole. > > >> > >> na, one at the pole and the other at the Equator, the equator rotates at > >> 24,901 miles in 24 hours or about 1,000 miles an hour relitive to the > >> pole, so the equator dudes are younger than pole dudes. which is easily > >> verified as the pole only has older people there, and the equator has > >> lots of babies in new countries.... > > > > > the south pole is the bottom.. > > the north pole it the top. > > > > elevation. > > > think > > east west > > this way and that way > > also called longitude > > > > then > > altitude > > south pole level > > and north pole at the top. > > > north points up. > > > > up. > > > > if you are at the south pole and they tell you to look up, do you look > at your feet, or do you look at the sky ? you mean "up" being the north pole?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: It's About Time Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 08:30 -0500
Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:15 -0700
Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:29 -0700
Re: It's About Time pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-07-23 12:22 -0700
Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:58 -0700
Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:17 -0700
csiph-web