Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #369839
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Technology's role in a climate solution |
| Date | 2015-11-12 21:40 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4jdfhc-mj3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <n20knt$1dh$2@speranza.aioe.org> <n21dda$dca$1@dont-email.me> <n22dk3$ic2$2@speranza.aioe.org> <n22mms$b1s$1@dont-email.me> <o7v94b50tpiuguve07s5c9q29c6nc3h7dv@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:47:01 +0100, Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On 11/12/2015 05:09 PM, Ludwig Böhm wrote: >>> Poutnik wrote: >>> >>>>>> Airliners have fuel efficiency about 2-3 L/seat/100km. >>>>>> ( Many people are not aware of the flying is more energy efficient >>>>>> than 1 person car driving ) >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft#Example_Values >>>>> >>>>> Has nothing to do with your litres. As I can see is about solar power. >>>>> Nowhere to use litres. >>>> >>>> As rate of spent fuel volume is *closely* related to required solar >>>> power. >>> >>> Of course not. Same way you may say is *closely* related to cubic meters >>> etc. A solar powered device or machine is NOT using litres anywhere in >>> their particular configuration. >>> >> >>What does say the term equivalence to you ? >> >>1 Litre of kerosene contains roughly 40 MJ of chemical energy. >>Spending rate 1 L/s is equivalent to providing power about 40 MW. >> >>Any solar based solution with comparable power and efficiency >>of used engines hasa to provide equivalent power >>comparable to fuel rate. > > 40 MW is about 50,000 HP, > the most solar an airliner could collect > is about 40 KW. > > The power needed has confused > even engineers (I think), the atomic > powered bomber reactors were only > about 2 megawatt, the power of the > gasoline reciprocating engines on > the B-36 were about 3000 HP each, > or more than 2 megawatt, and the > B-36 had 6 or 8 of them, so how > could a B-36 be powered with > 2 megawatt reactors? > The reactor in the NB-36H was 3MW and did not power anything; it was just a test of shielding. The same goes for the Soviet Tu-119 program. No nuclear powered airplane has flown. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-11-07 14:16 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-07 18:42 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-11-08 00:50 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 08:45 +0100
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 17:56 +0100
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-11 23:58 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 08:02 +0100
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 16:09 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:47 +0100
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 19:38 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 19:58 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 19:52 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 20:07 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 22:20 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 23:02 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 21:59 +0100
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution Ludwig Böhm <ludwb@widespectrum.com> - 2015-11-12 21:26 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-12 16:05 -0500
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 21:40 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0500
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 23:29 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-12 20:20 -0500
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-13 01:49 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-12 22:35 -0500
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-13 04:39 +0000
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 13:10 -0500
Re: Technology's role in a climate solution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-08 17:30 +0000
csiph-web