Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #647082 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hayden Maksimov <mmivy@eh.ru> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-01 14:00 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-08-06 13:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 63 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Hayden Maksimov <mmivy@eh.ru> - 2026-08-01 14:00 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-03 06:28 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Brooks Mikhaltsov <oov@vhitsair.ru> - 2026-08-03 12:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-05 07:21 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Toney Zolotenkov <ennv@nkt.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:20 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 06:51 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Rondell Martzenkov <dank@lona.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:57 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 07:09 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Yves Bilbasov <say@aee.ru> - 2026-08-06 18:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 11:30 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Cole Baharev <bae@avoa.ru> - 2026-08-06 20:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-07 05:02 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 18:53 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 08:44 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Victo Babahanov <biti@nia.ru> - 2026-08-07 10:16 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 08:12 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Presley Elepov <epse@eeveele.ru> - 2026-08-07 17:41 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 12:06 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Wilfredo Dogadaev <adaddw@wi.ru> - 2026-08-07 18:38 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-08 08:09 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 13:36 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 15:25 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 20:49 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 22:29 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 22:41 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 20:53 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-29 14:25 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 02:38 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 20:26 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-08 09:25 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 19:13 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-06 05:33 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-05 21:48 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 01:13 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 08:32 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Leslie Ruzimatov <lzoiev@smr.ru> - 2026-08-07 10:19 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 08:35 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-08 07:59 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Delbert Lohanov <hebh@rdooe.ru> - 2026-08-08 15:29 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-08 10:57 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Latane Tulebaev <eebet@tvaa.ru> - 2026-08-08 18:38 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-08 18:04 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Bertin Badikov <iiaid@vberi.ru> - 2026-08-09 14:21 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-09 09:50 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-09 09:47 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Beau Holmogorov <hb@olooa.ru> - 2026-08-09 14:18 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-09 10:55 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-10 05:40 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-08-10 11:02 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? (complex analysis and complex-complex analysis) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 06:55 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? (complex analysis and complex-complex analysis) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-10 07:12 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Hardy Babansky <bkyn@bkn.ru> - 2026-08-10 17:08 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-10 05:30 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Wendel Durmanov <reewn@dwnren.ru> - 2026-08-10 09:26 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-13 08:48 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Konrad Martyanov <rt@kytv.ru> - 2026-08-13 16:37 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-15 10:34 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Minh Holstov <oihi@mnsn.ru> - 2026-08-15 13:39 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-16 08:38 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Evin Bakalov <lbak@baa.ru> - 2026-08-16 21:30 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-18 09:07 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Hamilton Lokhov <anov@oaoomto.ru> - 2026-08-18 19:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Mercury Abdrahmanoff <frm@rbrh.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:51 +0000
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-18 09:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <neieleF9lreU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #647354 |
Am Sonntag000016, 16.08.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Evin Bakalov: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >>>> Sure, because there exist a number of different types of quaternions >>>> and Maxwell's were usual quaternions. >>>> >>>> I wanted to introduce so called 'complex four-vectors' (aka >>>> 'bi-quaternions'). >>> >>> then you both dont undrestand those equations, imaginary in math and >>> physics, nor what a quaternion is. Try tensors. Much easier. Gay >>> maxwell stole those equations from Faraday, then he supposed vortex >>> hexagons >> >> ??? >> >> I assume a certain structure of spacetime and try to derive particles >> from that structure. >> >> I called this idea 'structured spacetime' (for obvious reasons) and >> assumed, that nature would behave this way. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/ > 1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing >> >> This has nothing at all to do with Maxwell and where he got his ideas >> from. > > nevermind, you already proved you dont undrestand maxwell, calling him > imaginary. Also, geormony are slaves trying to speak english for whatever > obscure reason > English is the 'modern Esperanto' or 'lingua franca' and serves as language for international communication. This has actually little to do with the actual language 'English' as spoken on the British Isles. It is more an agreement, which helps to communicate around the globe. BTW: Germans are by no means the people with the best knowledge of English as a second language. That are, afiak, the people of Finnland. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hamilton Lokhov <anov@oaoomto.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-18 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1162a74$25dv0$1@news.nntp4.net> |
| In reply to | #647366 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > BTW: Germans are by no means the people with the best knowledge of > English as a second language. > > That are, afiak, the people of Finnland. you correct again, those are slaves gays too, from russia
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mercury Abdrahmanoff <frm@rbrh.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-06 13:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11523gu$g130$2@news.nntp4.net> |
| In reply to | #647158 |
Thomas Heger wrote: >>> I compare spacetime diagrams with Argand diagrams and find >>> similarities. >>> >>> That's why I thought, that spacetime of GR is real and has complex >>> valued components. >> >> The z-plane is a discrete-time version of the s-plane, where >> z-transforms are used instead of the Laplace transformation. > > That's true. > > But I wanted to start at the GR side and proceed from there to the > QM-side. > > Actually my aim was to build particles out of spacetime (of GR), hence > assume the real existence of something like the z-plane (which I simply > called 'complex plane'), but 'in volume'. > > Then the axis of time is local and in a cone around it we find what we > call 'space' and perpendicular as an inverse to time the hyperplane of > the present. unbelievable so much crap in a short sentence. A z-plane involves discrete sampled frequencies. Do it again, one more time
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web