Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math |
| Subject | Re: called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones |
| Date | 2018-03-18 05:01 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <p8krrb$dc2$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <2809ad26-fe8a-4c8f-abb4-9f43751c9846@googlegroups.com> <0e356fd5-8107-409d-9488-3db6e7fd193b@googlegroups.com> <33d57e8c-7bc7-49f8-976e-d6b60431cc28@googlegroups.com> <f870b12e-fe18-49fe-8e2b-f3d976108a0d@googlegroups.com> <p81n8j$9i$4@pcls7.std.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
[nothing]
>Michael Moroney wrote
>4:46 PM (2 hours ago)
>>Oh, so you finally have a [proof the ellipse is not a conic section?]
Archie posted that snippet yet again, even though it's a week old now.
At least 10 times in (at least) two groups. Guess it must really bug
him that he still has no proof the ellipse is not a conic section.
It continues to amuse me how kooks do something totally illogical, and
then do it over and over again. Like how Archie quotes a contextless
snippet of what I wrote, to the wrong topic, and frequently in the wrong
group, and says nothing about it himself. And he keeps doing that.
Why? Dementia? Autism? Senility? OCD? Schizophrenia?
Or maybe he just wants to see this proof that the ellipse can be a conic
section again.
Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Re: AP's Periodic Table of Atoms in light of the fact Real Proton= 840MeV, Real Electron= 105MeV, the .5MeV= monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 13:50 -0800
New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Re: AP's Periodic Table of Atoms in light of the fact Real Proton= 840MeV, Real Electron= 105MeV, the .5MeV= monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 14:03 -0800
New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Re: AP's Periodic Table of Atoms in light of the fact Real Proton= 840MeV, Real Electron= 105MeV, the .5MeV= monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 14:18 -0800
New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Re: AP's Periodic Table of Atoms in light of the fact Real Proton= 840MeV, Real Electron= 105MeV, the .5MeV= monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 17:26 -0800
called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 17:40 -0800
Re: called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 17:55 -0800
Re: called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-10 22:46 +0000
Re: called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-18 05:01 +0000
Re: called Double Gyres Re: New Chemistry Table-- two superimposed cones Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 17:34 -0800
csiph-web