Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.environment > #97883 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-31 10:36 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-05-31 10:36 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.environment
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
10 billions tons of CO2 = 50 x 50 square miles of forest 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-05-31 10:36 +0000
| From | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 10:36 +0000 |
| Subject | 10 billions tons of CO2 = 50 x 50 square miles of forest |
| Message-ID | <dr57onF4iahU1@mid.individual.net> |
R Kym Horsell wrote: > > > Is wind power doing its job? 10 billions tons of CO2 annually accounts for at best 50 x 50 square miles of forest. Such a staggeringly small area you could drive around in 4 hours. The entire CO2 output in last 100 years would not amount to 500x500 miles square forest. quack quack! Saving 10% is about 15 miles x 15 miles square area of forest. You could cycle around that in a half a day. Anti-denialists are finding it difficult to comprehend that 0.04% CO2 causes exactly less than 0.04% glow bull wumming. Even though all the original proposers of glow bull wumming now retract their outrages pseudo science alarm claims and accept real science is 100% correct.
Back to top | Article view | sci.environment
csiph-web