Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.environment > #101815
| From | phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.global-warming, or.politics, sci.environment, talk.politics.guns |
| Subject | Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy |
| Date | 2026-05-23 11:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7e4piFm1moU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <6a10dbf2$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6a11c73a$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <n7e34oFlogqU2@mid.individual.net> <6a11d7b6$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6a11da27$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
zendejo wrote: > On 5/23/26 10:37 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote: >> He’s tacitly admitting he does not understand the very points he >> brings up. > > > Finally, it might seem churlish to pick on a single mainstream media > RCP8.5 nonsense story, but there is one that is your correspondent’s > favourite. This article not only reported RCP8.5 fantasies but climbed > even further heights, going where no other story has gone before. In May > last year, Mark Poynting of the BBC claimed that “scientists say” > coastal land and beyond could be overwhelmed with several metres of sea > level rise if global temperature moves by three-tenths of a degree > centigrade. This claim was arrived at by pushing the boundaries well > beyond what even SSP5-8.5 (a newer version of RCP8.5) predicted. Based > on a paper looking at polar ice melt, which gave a high emissions > projected rise by 2100 of between 12 and 52 centimetres, Poynting > chanced on a suggestion that the IPCC said it could not rule out > (admittedly with “low confidence”) that the pathway could point to a sea > level rise of over 15 metres by 2300. So Poynting got his several metres > of inundation story, “even if ambitious targets of limiting global > warming to 1.5°C is met”. > > Purely anecdotal, but the BBC seems to have moderated its wilder climate > stories of late with the “Climate” topic on its News site relegated to > the second tier of subjects. This might be considered a bit of a status > drop for a subject whose authors had past pretentions to provide an > essential core for all reporting. Now it finds itself rubbing shoulders > with the picture gallery and the dumbed-down “Newsbeat” offering. > > > But we must avoid the temptation to intrude on private grief. It is to > be hoped that this move does not spell the end of the highly imaginative > claptrap classics that have added to the gaiety of the nation over so > many years. Regular readers will recall climate change could make beer > taste worse and the Gulf Stream could collapse by 2025 – how we shall > miss all this copy aimed at the idiot short of a village. > > In all other things, submitting that the worst scenario is not plausible, one might seek the actual worst case scenario instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater and living a life of ease, whistling under a tree and forgetting about the whole deal. Had you considered this? If this RCP8.5 is not plausible, what is? Perhaps a milder case of terribleness? That we might have 20 years to save ourselves instead of 15? What do you hope to gain by harping about the irrationality of RCP8.5 while climate change remains a true concern? It seems rather than arguing about climate change and what might be discerned from facts, you would rather leap upon an admission that it's not as bad as we had thought and trumpet it to the skies saying the whole thing is a sham. The only reason to do this would be if it were arrived at RCP8.5 with the intention to deceive, yet you have shown none of this. Climate change is a difficult science and perhaps we fail at it from time to time, but what do you actually contribute to the conversation or question regarding it besides second grade putdowns and an unwillingness to come to the table with an intent to be earnest? BTW thanks a whole lot for reporting me to the FBI. They've slowed down my machine considerably and I may have to throw it out. Is it too much to ask for grownups to communicate with and not second grade tattle tales? -- War in the east War in the west War up north War down south War War
Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-22 16:29 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 22:42 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 09:14 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 10:32 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:37 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 10:47 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:55 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:28 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 18:53 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 14:08 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 01:05 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@ZyklonB.org> - 2026-05-24 01:58 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-24 11:13 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 17:51 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-24 13:13 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 11:00 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 18:14 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:32 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:31 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 10:41 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:27 -0600
csiph-web