Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.environment > #101816
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.global-warming, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics, sci.environment, talk.politics.guns |
| Subject | Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy |
| Organization | Southern Nevada Institute of Technology |
| References | <XnsB44ED9D9F91E3629555@185.151.15.190> <6a11d7b6$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6a11da27$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <n7e4piFm1moU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2026-05-23 18:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6a11ee7f$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On May 23, 2026 at 10:00:31 AM MST, "phoenix" wrote <n7e4piFm1moU1@mid.individual.net>: > zendejo wrote: >> On 5/23/26 10:37 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote: >>> He’s tacitly admitting he does not understand the very points he >>> brings up. >> >> >> Finally, it might seem churlish to pick on a single mainstream media >> RCP8.5 nonsense story, but there is one that is your correspondent’s >> favourite. This article not only reported RCP8.5 fantasies but climbed >> even further heights, going where no other story has gone before. In May >> last year, Mark Poynting of the BBC claimed that “scientists say” >> coastal land and beyond could be overwhelmed with several metres of sea >> level rise if global temperature moves by three-tenths of a degree >> centigrade. This claim was arrived at by pushing the boundaries well >> beyond what even SSP5-8.5 (a newer version of RCP8.5) predicted. Based >> on a paper looking at polar ice melt, which gave a high emissions >> projected rise by 2100 of between 12 and 52 centimetres, Poynting >> chanced on a suggestion that the IPCC said it could not rule out >> (admittedly with “low confidence”) that the pathway could point to a sea >> level rise of over 15 metres by 2300. So Poynting got his several metres >> of inundation story, “even if ambitious targets of limiting global >> warming to 1.5°C is met”. >> >> Purely anecdotal, but the BBC seems to have moderated its wilder climate >> stories of late with the “Climate” topic on its News site relegated to >> the second tier of subjects. This might be considered a bit of a status >> drop for a subject whose authors had past pretentions to provide an >> essential core for all reporting. Now it finds itself rubbing shoulders >> with the picture gallery and the dumbed-down “Newsbeat” offering. >> >> >> But we must avoid the temptation to intrude on private grief. It is to >> be hoped that this move does not spell the end of the highly imaginative >> claptrap classics that have added to the gaiety of the nation over so >> many years. Regular readers will recall climate change could make beer >> taste worse and the Gulf Stream could collapse by 2025 – how we shall >> miss all this copy aimed at the idiot short of a village. >> >> > In all other things, submitting that the worst scenario is not > plausible, one might seek the actual worst case scenario instead of > throwing the baby out with the bathwater and living a life of ease, > whistling under a tree and forgetting about the whole deal. Had you > considered this? If this RCP8.5 is not plausible, what is? Perhaps a > milder case of terribleness? That we might have 20 years to save > ourselves instead of 15? What do you hope to gain by harping about the > irrationality of RCP8.5 while climate change remains a true concern? > > It seems rather than arguing about climate change and what might be > discerned from facts, you would rather leap upon an admission that it's > not as bad as we had thought and trumpet it to the skies saying the > whole thing is a sham. The only reason to do this would be if it were > arrived at RCP8.5 with the intention to deceive, yet you have shown none > of this. Climate change is a difficult science and perhaps we fail at it > from time to time, but what do you actually contribute to the > conversation or question regarding it besides second grade putdowns and > an unwillingness to come to the table with an intent to be earnest? > > BTW thanks a whole lot for reporting me to the FBI. They've slowed down > my machine considerably and I may have to throw it out. > > Is it too much to ask for grownups to communicate with and not second > grade tattle tales? Well worded. But keep in mind the corporations that benefit -- short term -- from not dealing with the well understood harm have told him to ignore science. So he does. Add to that, the conspiracy theorists get to feel special -- they are "in the know" with their ignorance. Psychologically it helps them not feel so out of control. It really is a shame. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-22 16:29 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 22:42 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 09:14 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 10:32 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:37 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 10:47 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:55 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:28 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 18:53 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 14:08 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 01:05 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@ZyklonB.org> - 2026-05-24 01:58 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-24 11:13 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 17:51 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-24 13:13 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 11:00 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 18:14 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:32 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:31 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 10:41 -0600
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy zendejo <zd@no.here> - 2026-05-23 12:27 -0600
csiph-web