Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #455010

Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C

Path csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!wb8foz
From David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C
Date Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 +0000 (UTC)
Organization NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews Abusers - Beltway Annex
Lines 34
Message-ID <obv27d$ans$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <ob4lm9$k58$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob6b9p$9a2$1@dont-email.me> <ob7f1h$ktg$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob7nd0$nvi$1@dont-email.me> <ob8ju3$ap4$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob8r5i$ua3$1@dont-email.me> <ob960e$p4u$1@reader1.panix.com> <obb8jp$ur3$1@dont-email.me> <obbmdn$cij$1@gonzo.alcatraz> <rk6jdcduuolspodf8ivi36sn0m4bn60etn@4ax.com> <08WdnZ9VyIcj60fFnZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@supernews.com> <obebr7$uu3$1@gonzo.alcatraz> <7oeldc5ibmm7svcqecs2knh0thoif9bs2c@4ax.com> <obu1ue$rcc$1@reader1.panix.com> <obu71i$6eb$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host panix5.panix.com
X-Trace reader1.panix.com 1491274797 11004 166.84.1.5 (4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent nn/6.7.3
Xref csiph.com sci.electronics.design:455010

Show key headers only | View raw


rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes:


>Why don't you just get a controller that includes Ethernet to start with?

The controllers we have seen are 6-12X the price of this approach.

>I haven't seen where you explain why you are only looking at PLC 
>controllers rather than generic CPU boards.  

>From how you have explained your needs so far, there is
>nothing in a PLC that you will use that is different from a CPU
>board.  From what I can see, you would do well with a Raspberry
>Pi or a Beagle Bone Black type board.  Ethernet included and
>tons of support (metric tons even).

This controller has value-added in integration, packaging, input
protection and such. They have done things we will not have to
ourselves.

We looked at Beagles but want to avoid the issues with
supporting a Linux device. (& that would be far more overkill.)

>So what do you get with a PLC that you don't get with one of the *many* 
>CPU boards?

I've not found an Arduino case/touchscreen/AD/input protection/ etc
that we can plug in and fly with. Suggestions?

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close..........................
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-25 02:46 +0000
  Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-24 23:25 -0400
    Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:13 +0000
  Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:04 -0400
    Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:11 +0000
      Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 02:37 -0400
        Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 14:41 +0000
          Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 12:47 -0400
            Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 19:49 +0000
              Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:49 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:07 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 08:03 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-28 10:44 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 18:59 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2017-03-28 15:37 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-03 17:49 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 15:18 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-04 02:59 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 00:54 -0400
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 05:08 +0000
                Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 02:16 -0400
  Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:03 -0400
    Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 03:28 +0000
      Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 00:38 -0400
        Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 14:47 +0000

csiph-web