Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #455010
| Path | csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!wb8foz |
|---|---|
| From | David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C |
| Date | Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews Abusers - Beltway Annex |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <obv27d$ans$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ob4lm9$k58$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob6b9p$9a2$1@dont-email.me> <ob7f1h$ktg$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob7nd0$nvi$1@dont-email.me> <ob8ju3$ap4$1@reader1.panix.com> <ob8r5i$ua3$1@dont-email.me> <ob960e$p4u$1@reader1.panix.com> <obb8jp$ur3$1@dont-email.me> <obbmdn$cij$1@gonzo.alcatraz> <rk6jdcduuolspodf8ivi36sn0m4bn60etn@4ax.com> <08WdnZ9VyIcj60fFnZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@supernews.com> <obebr7$uu3$1@gonzo.alcatraz> <7oeldc5ibmm7svcqecs2knh0thoif9bs2c@4ax.com> <obu1ue$rcc$1@reader1.panix.com> <obu71i$6eb$1@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | panix5.panix.com |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1491274797 11004 166.84.1.5 (4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 4 Apr 2017 02:59:57 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | nn/6.7.3 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.electronics.design:455010 |
Show key headers only | View raw
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: >Why don't you just get a controller that includes Ethernet to start with? The controllers we have seen are 6-12X the price of this approach. >I haven't seen where you explain why you are only looking at PLC >controllers rather than generic CPU boards. >From how you have explained your needs so far, there is >nothing in a PLC that you will use that is different from a CPU >board. From what I can see, you would do well with a Raspberry >Pi or a Beagle Bone Black type board. Ethernet included and >tons of support (metric tons even). This controller has value-added in integration, packaging, input protection and such. They have done things we will not have to ourselves. We looked at Beagles but want to avoid the issues with supporting a Linux device. (& that would be far more overkill.) >So what do you get with a PLC that you don't get with one of the *many* >CPU boards? I've not found an Arduino case/touchscreen/AD/input protection/ etc that we can plug in and fly with. Suggestions? -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close.......................... Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-25 02:46 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-24 23:25 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:13 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:04 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 02:37 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 14:41 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 12:47 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 19:49 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:49 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:07 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 08:03 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-28 10:44 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 18:59 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2017-03-28 15:37 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-03 17:49 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 15:18 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-04 02:59 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 00:54 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 05:08 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 02:16 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:03 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 03:28 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 00:38 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 14:47 +0000
csiph-web