Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #453680
| From | David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C |
| Date | 2017-03-26 04:13 +0000 |
| Organization | NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews Abusers - Beltway Annex |
| Message-ID | <ob7f4v$pce$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ob4lm9$k58$1@reader1.panix.com> <fmobdcludmo6n80r0bm06v7inbv4uoslbh@4ax.com> |
krw@notreal.com writes: >>Is there a reason to use I2C over SPI? It looks like there are 8-channel >>boards of both ilks, and I don't know if one has an advantage in this case. >I2C across connectors isn't recommended. SPI is far more robust, >though can be a bit more complicated in large systems. By this you mean ribbon cable jumpers & headers are ixnay? -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close.......................... Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-25 02:46 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-24 23:25 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:13 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:04 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 02:37 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 14:41 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 12:47 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-26 19:49 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:49 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:07 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 08:03 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-28 10:44 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-28 18:59 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2017-03-28 15:37 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-03 17:49 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 15:18 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-04-04 02:59 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 00:54 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 05:08 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 02:16 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2017-03-27 19:03 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 03:28 +0000
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 00:38 -0400
Re: Output boards, SPI vs I2C David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-03-28 14:47 +0000
csiph-web