Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.crypt > #50156

Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography.

From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups sci.crypt
Subject Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography.
Date 2021-09-26 15:44 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <871r5btn02.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <sio9bh$p5c$2@dont-email.me> <d761a3e1-015a-4b95-996f-455091aaf349n@googlegroups.com> <59e8775b-917c-4543-91c5-1a06de70929fn@googlegroups.com> <sipt5q$7jc$1@dont-email.me> <4eccc340-c6aa-4b19-88ac-f659889eec7en@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 14:39:09 UTC+1, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 26/09/2021 14:27, MM wrote: 
>> > On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 10:27:03 UTC+1, austin obyrne wrote: 
>> >> I would gladly do that if I thought it was at all feasible. 
>> > 
>> > It is entirely feasible.
>> If it isn't, ASLEC doesn't exist.
>
> Quite so. If you can't describe it well enough for someone else to
> implement it, you have nothing.
>
> What is the point of having ideas if you can't communicate them
> properly?

To get a boost to your ego when clearly knowledgeable people talk about
your "work".  I think 99% of crank posts are about countering the
feeling of being insignificant -- "people are talking about me, I am not
a nobody".  To this end, having ideas that you communicate badly is the
holy grail.  Many the posts will be along the lines of "what do you
mean?" and that's very rewarding attention -- "Yes, my ideas a complex.
Let me break it down for you...".

Even insults are good.  "Your work is junk" is attention.  And if it can
be spun into the "I am obviously challenging the status quo", so much
the better.

-- 
Ben.

Back to sci.crypt | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ASLEC  cipher and Vector Cryptography. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 10:42 -0700
  Re: ASLEC  cipher and Vector Cryptography. Leo <usenet@gkbrk.com> - 2021-09-25 22:54 +0000
    Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 02:27 -0700
      Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-26 11:32 +0100
      Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 06:22 -0700
      Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 06:27 -0700
        Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-26 14:39 +0100
          Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 07:09 -0700
            Re: ASLEC cipher and Vector Cryptography. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-26 15:44 +0100

csiph-web