Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rocksolid.programming > #159 > unrolled thread

that's for interactive mode

Back to article view | Back to rocksolid.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  that's for interactive mode Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-12-17 05:05 -0800

#159 — that's for interactive mode

>>cef79e59c453b34000
I understand that you describe the interactive mode of Lynx, so this does not concern my setup (I use predefined calls where the hostname and everything is fixed, and the user input is used as a group or message. My concern here was that separate commands could be injected this way, but I have not managed to do this). Still good to know, thanks.

A little research shows that Lynx has a pretty good track record:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=5836&product_id=9869&version_id=0&page=1&hasexp=0&opdos=0&opec=0&opov=0&opcsrf=0&opgpriv=0&opsqli=0&opxss=0&opdirt=0&opmemc=0&ophttprs=0&opbyp=0&opfileinc=0&opginf=0&cvssscoremin=0&cvssscoremax=0&year=0&cweid=0&order=1&trc=5&sha=3f93be2ac58707975914133ab453aee7b2962f26

Of course somebody could probably still worm their way in, we will see :-)

-- 
Posted on def2

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | rocksolid.programming

csiph-web