Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rocksolid.programming > #159

that's for interactive mode

Show all headers | View raw

>>cef79e59c453b34000
I understand that you describe the interactive mode of Lynx, so this does not concern my setup (I use predefined calls where the hostname and everything is fixed, and the user input is used as a group or message. My concern here was that separate commands could be injected this way, but I have not managed to do this). Still good to know, thanks.

A little research shows that Lynx has a pretty good track record:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=5836&product_id=9869&version_id=0&page=1&hasexp=0&opdos=0&opec=0&opov=0&opcsrf=0&opgpriv=0&opsqli=0&opxss=0&opdirt=0&opmemc=0&ophttprs=0&opbyp=0&opfileinc=0&opginf=0&cvssscoremin=0&cvssscoremax=0&year=0&cweid=0&order=1&trc=5&sha=3f93be2ac58707975914133ab453aee7b2962f26

Of course somebody could probably still worm their way in, we will see :-)

-- 
Posted on def2

Back to rocksolid.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

that's for interactive mode Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-12-17 05:05 -0800

csiph-web