Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #441269 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-04 22:23 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-07 00:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 94 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to rec.arts.sf.written
Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2016-06-04 22:23 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> - 2016-06-05 06:47 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-06-06 21:19 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines mcdowell_ag@sky.com - 2016-06-05 08:37 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-05 10:57 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-05 18:33 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-05 11:43 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-05 20:40 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:22 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-06-09 01:29 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-09 07:54 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-06-09 12:35 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-09 12:45 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-06-10 21:46 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-11 09:35 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-06-11 14:06 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-11 23:32 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-06-11 23:49 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-12 04:34 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-06-13 22:32 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-06-14 14:09 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Joe Bernstein <joe@sfbooks.com> - 2016-06-09 09:17 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2016-06-09 21:31 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-10 05:16 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-06-10 02:37 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-04 18:41 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-09 11:56 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Joe Bernstein <joe@sfbooks.com> - 2016-06-09 18:55 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Jerry Brown <jerry@jwbrown.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-06-09 21:04 +0100
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2016-06-10 03:24 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-10 15:00 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-06-10 14:05 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Richard Botting <rjbotting03@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 09:59 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lenona321@yahoo.com - 2016-06-23 17:57 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-25 00:16 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Brenda <brendawriter@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-11 22:01 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-06-11 21:13 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-06-12 02:04 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-12 07:18 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 06:57 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb) - 2016-06-12 06:24 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-12 10:44 +0300
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines mcdowell_ag@sky.com - 2016-06-12 05:48 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-06-12 13:28 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-06-12 14:53 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-06-12 20:46 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Jesper Lauridsen <rorschak@sorrystofanet.dk> - 2016-07-14 00:04 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-06-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-06-06 11:30 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2016-06-07 00:49 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-06-06 19:52 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-06-06 21:25 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David Johnston <Davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-06 20:59 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 20:25 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2016-06-07 05:02 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-07 05:09 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2016-06-07 05:51 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-07 06:21 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-06-06 23:31 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Jerry Brown <jerry@jwbrown.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-06-07 09:43 +0100
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Stephen Allcroft <stephenallcroft@lycos.co.uk> - 2016-06-07 02:22 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-06-07 14:30 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 12:05 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Howard C <howard.r.carter@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 07:55 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-06-08 02:23 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-07 23:02 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2016-06-10 01:39 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> - 2016-06-07 05:04 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-06-07 09:58 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2016-06-07 20:54 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> - 2016-06-07 14:50 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-06-07 21:58 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> - 2016-06-07 15:19 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-06-08 13:53 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines lal_truckee <lal_truckee@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> - 2016-06-07 16:34 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-06-07 04:59 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 05:33 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-04 21:01 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2016-08-05 02:53 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-04 23:19 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2016-08-05 18:32 +1200
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-08-05 08:37 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-08-06 04:53 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2016-08-08 16:07 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-08-09 08:43 -0600
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2016-08-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 04:35 -0400
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-08-05 14:04 +1000
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-06-06 21:23 -0500
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-06-23 02:24 -0700
Re: Examples where authors messed up Timelines Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-08-07 00:24 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-04 21:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <no0ohd$j2j$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #441339 |
In article <20160606b@crcomp.net>, Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> said: > Speaking of time travel paradoxes, it seems to me that the > Grandfather Paradox only applies to suicidal travelers. Off the > top of my head, there are at least four stories where travelers > meet young version of themselves: "By His Bootstraps" by RAH, "All > You Zombies" by RAH, "The Man Who Folded Himself" by Gerrold, and > "The Time Travelers Wife" by Niffenegger. L. Neil Smith had a story in which the answer to the Grandfather Paradox was "If you travel back in time and try to kill your grandfather, you will die." Mostly because the grandfather in this case was way faster on the draw. (Going solely by Smith's (very short) short-story title list in the ISFDB, I'm pretty sure it had to be "Grandfather Clause," http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?94387) -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 02:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20160804a@crcomp.net> |
| In reply to | #446903 |
William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote: > In article <20160606b@crcomp.net>, > Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> said: > >> Speaking of time travel paradoxes, it seems to me that the >> Grandfather Paradox only applies to suicidal travelers. Off the >> top of my head, there are at least four stories where travelers >> meet young version of themselves: "By His Bootstraps" by RAH, "All >> You Zombies" by RAH, "The Man Who Folded Himself" by Gerrold, and >> "The Time Travelers Wife" by Niffenegger. > > L. Neil Smith had a story in which the answer to the Grandfather > Paradox was "If you travel back in time and try to kill your > grandfather, you will die." Mostly because the grandfather in this > case was way faster on the draw. > > (Going solely by Smith's (very short) short-story title list in the > ISFDB, I'm pretty sure it had to be "Grandfather Clause," > http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?94387) Thank you. That's one way to eliminate the paradox. FWIW, a used MMPB from AbeBooks is now on its way to me. AbeBooks typically saves you a few dimes over the other guy. [1] "Grandfather Clause" is absent from Nahin's _Time Machines_ (my hobby horse). Vinge's _Marooned in Real Time_ (the current object of my obsession) is also missing from the Nahin. That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather Paradox. It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the future. There is no going back to a previous time. So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? That's the open question in my mind. The Nahin contains much more than just Science Fiction. It talks about the "Arrows of Time". Eddington says that increasing entropy is an arrow of time. Cross' "Prisoner of Time" mentions Eddington by name and uses a bubble with zero entropy to propel a damsel in distress forward into the future. _Marooned_ uses "bobbles" that enable people to travel forward into future. The people inside the bobble do not age. The bobble interior remains timeless until it opens. It follows that bobbles also use zero entropy, but thus far (three of the four story segments serialized in _Analog_ now read) Vinge does not mention entropy. Note. 1. http://preview.tinyurl.com/c5fwmze -- Don Kuenz KB7RPU Data scrutator, Extrapolator, You forecast by rigadoon. You used to extol The Gallup Poll But now you are shooting the moon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-04 23:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <no10jk$pb6$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #446927 |
In article <20160804a@crcomp.net>, Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> said: > That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather > Paradox. It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the > future. There is no going back to a previous time. > > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? > That's the open question in my mind. I think it does. What paradoxes could it open that. e.g., the use of freeze-now-thaw-centuries-later suspended animation couldn't? -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 18:32 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <no1bua$krk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #446936 |
On 05/08/16 15:19, William December Starr wrote: > In article <20160804a@crcomp.net>, > Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> said: > >> That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather >> Paradox. It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the >> future. There is no going back to a previous time. >> >> So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? >> That's the open question in my mind. (Good post and I have been enjoying your signature poems.) > > I think it does. What paradoxes could it open that. e.g., the use > of freeze-now-thaw-centuries-later suspended animation couldn't? A Mallard could father a younger brother who could be born a year after the original Mallard but who is old enough to be his great grandfather. A pair of ducks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 08:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9irneugdmlvo$.14e9l1290dwui$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #446960 |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:32:40 +1200, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in<news:no1bua$krk$1@dont-email.me> in rec.arts.sf.written: [...] > A pair of ducks. That’s not cricket. Well, okay -- it’s very *bad* cricket. Brian -- It was the neap tide, when the baga venture out of their holes to root for sandtatties. The waves whispered rhythmically over the packed sand: haggisss, haggisss, haggisss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 04:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d4aec023-bd59-4bfc-8a87-af0bb9cb0529@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #446936 |
On Friday, 5 August 2016 04:19:18 UTC+1, William December Starr wrote: > In article <20160804a@crcomp.net>, > Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> said: > > > That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather > > Paradox. It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the > > future. There is no going back to a previous time. > > > > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? > > That's the open question in my mind. > > I think it does. What paradoxes could it open that. e.g., the use > of freeze-now-thaw-centuries-later suspended animation couldn't? You can travel in time beyond the end of the universe and then enter the next cycle at an earlier point? (Futurama ... which?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 16:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20160808a@crcomp.net> |
| In reply to | #447092 |
Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 5 August 2016 04:19:18 UTC+1, William December Starr wrote:
>> In article <20160804a@crcomp.net>,
>> Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> said:
>>
>> > That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather
>> > Paradox. It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the
>> > future. There is no going back to a previous time.
>> >
>> > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes?
>> > That's the open question in my mind.
>>
>> I think it does. What paradoxes could it open that. e.g., the use
>> of freeze-now-thaw-centuries-later suspended animation couldn't?
>
> You can travel in time beyond the end of
> the universe and then enter the next cycle
> at an earlier point? (Futurama ... which?)
spoiler space
That's actually a plot point in the story. The family Robinson (LOL)
bobbles headlong, at a megayear clip, into the future. They don't know
exactly what to expect at the end of the universe.
"Those lunatics want to continue down time, sightseeing their
way into eternity. Robinson figures if he can persuade most of
us to come along, he'll have a stable system. He calls it 'time
like urbanization.' For the next few billion years, his colony
would spend about a month per megayear outside of stasis. As
the sun goes off main sequence, they'll move into space and
bobble through longer and longer jumps. He literally wants to
follow the evolution of the whole g*dd*mned universe!"
Meanwhile, in the story proper, a murder mystery's been percolating on
the back burner. Detective Wil Brirerson cracks the case at the end of
the third installment. The fourth and final installment is next for me.
A few people note that you ought to read "Ungoverned" before you embark
on _Marooned_ for the first time. That's sound advice. Otherwise you may
end up speed reading "Ungoverned" for the sake of Wil Brierson's back
story.
--
Don Kuenz KB7RPU
agoragraph. To measure the area of an enclosed plane surface by tracing
the boundary with a planimeter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-09 08:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e0u8gcFc3kjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #447399 |
Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> wrote: >>> > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? >The fourth and final installment is next for me. I was not aware of a fourth story. What's the title? -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-09 19:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20160809a@crcomp.net> |
| In reply to | #447526 |
Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> wrote: > >>>> > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? >>The fourth and final installment is next for me. > > I was not aware of a fourth story. What's the title? It's the fourth and final installment of _Marooned_ as serialized by _Analog_ in the May, June, July, and August 1986 issues. The conclusion in the August 1986 is currently being read by me. You already know whodunnit. OTOH my suspicions are the only thing left to me at this point. :0) -- Don Kuenz KB7RPU agronomist. Agricultural specialist in the theory and practive of field crop production and soil management; a farmer with a Ph.D.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 04:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.320f6b73169b804b98a442@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #446927 |
In article <20160804a@crcomp.net>, g@crcomp.net says... > > William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote: > > In article <20160606b@crcomp.net>, > > Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> said: > > > >> Speaking of time travel paradoxes, it seems to me that the > >> Grandfather Paradox only applies to suicidal travelers. Off the > >> top of my head, there are at least four stories where travelers > >> meet young version of themselves: "By His Bootstraps" by RAH, "All > >> You Zombies" by RAH, "The Man Who Folded Himself" by Gerrold, and > >> "The Time Travelers Wife" by Niffenegger. > > > > L. Neil Smith had a story in which the answer to the Grandfather > > Paradox was "If you travel back in time and try to kill your > > grandfather, you will die." Mostly because the grandfather in this > > case was way faster on the draw. > > > > (Going solely by Smith's (very short) short-story title list in the > > ISFDB, I'm pretty sure it had to be "Grandfather Clause," > > http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?94387) > > Thank you. That's one way to eliminate the paradox. > > FWIW, a used MMPB from AbeBooks is now on its way to me. AbeBooks > typically saves you a few dimes over the other guy. [1] > > "Grandfather Clause" is absent from Nahin's _Time Machines_ (my hobby > horse). Vinge's _Marooned in Real Time_ (the current object of my > obsession) is also missing from the Nahin. > > That's a shame because _Marooned_ eliminates the Grandfather Paradox. > It limits temporal movement to only one direction: the future. There is > no going back to a previous time. > > So, does time travel _Marooned_ style eliminate all paradoxes? That's > the open question in my mind. > > The Nahin contains much more than just Science Fiction. It talks about > the "Arrows of Time". Eddington says that increasing entropy is an arrow > of time. Cross' "Prisoner of Time" mentions Eddington by name and uses > a bubble with zero entropy to propel a damsel in distress forward into > the future. > > _Marooned_ uses "bobbles" that enable people to travel forward into > future. The people inside the bobble do not age. The bobble interior > remains timeless until it opens. It follows that bobbles also use zero > entropy, but thus far (three of the four story segments serialized in > _Analog_ now read) Vinge does not mention entropy. > > Note. > > 1. http://preview.tinyurl.com/c5fwmze Time travel "marooned" style works very much like experienced reality so why would it create paradoxes? All you have to do to travel a million years into the future if you are never going to return is "not die". Now admittedly that's a tall order but still, all that the bobbles manage in that regard is to provide a means to accomplish "not die".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Colquhoun <newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 14:04 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnq842c.hg1.newsposter@andor.dropbear.id.au> |
| In reply to | #441339 |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:49:45 -0000 (UTC), Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> wrote:
| peaking of time travel paradoxes, it seems to me that the Grandfather
| Paradox only applies to suicidal travelers. Off the top of my head,
| there are at least four stories where travelers meet young version of
| themselves: "By His Bootstraps" by RAH, "All You Zombies" by RAH,
| "The Man Who Folded Himself" by Gerrold, and "The Time Travelers Wife"
| by Niffenegger.
|
| In these stories, travelers protect their younger selves out of a sense
| of self-preservation. They also guide their younger selves.
Also, "Time Enough for Love" by RAH. But he doesn't guide his younger
self. In fact he tries to avoid any interaction, IIRC.
--
Reverend Paul Colquhoun, ULC. http://andor.dropbear.id.au/
Asking for technical help in newsgroups? Read this first:
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 21:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <P4adnTDW9v2srcvKnZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #441322 |
On 2016-06-06, Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote: > Terry Pratchett kind of explicitly gave up on keeping > a straight timeline in his Discworld novels, by > introducing an organisation of secret monks who were > responsible for stopping people in the story from > noticing the contradictions. Or something like that. And, in one spectacular case, stitching a broken and fragmented history back together entirely. The History Monks and their leader and their zen master appear in several of the books, but get the spotlight in Thief of Time. > And the big city setting went from 16th century > London-ish to 19th century in about one generation. > (The guy in charge is very determined.) Well, that's partly our fault, as morphogenic resonance means that since we on Roundworld did it all first (sort of, time does not match up in any sensible way between the two), steam-engine time, so to speak, had a much easier time arriving on Discworld. Dave, paging Mr Peabody and/or Sherman -- \/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> http://gatekeeper.vic.com/~dbd/ -net.legends/Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-23 02:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58f50c73-b898-4c30-9363-c90911093160@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #441269 |
On Sunday, 5 June 2016 06:23:31 UTC+1, Robert Woodward wrote: > One of the potential problems when a novel (or a sequence of novels) has > two (or more) parallel plot tracks is getting out of synchronization. I > remember John Cramer mentioning that he put the plot of his first novel > (_Twistor_) in to MS Project to ensure that there was enough time in > each track to support the plot and that the tracks stayed synchronized. > But I suspect that this (or the equivalent) has been skipped by other > authors. I think I put off mentioning, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_the_Earth%27s_Core_%28novel%29> in which "time in Pellucidar, in the absence of objective means to measure it [i.e. day and night, or movement of the sun], is a subjective thing, experienced by different people at different rates" - so that when the Athletic Hero returns from "a number of adventures" to rescue the Elderly Inventor, the latter has experienced no time since the departure of the former. I think this is either brilliant, or idiotic, or because Edgar Rice Burroughs didn't want to have to tell us what the Elderly Inventor had been doing in the meantime, not to mention that meanwhile Dian the Beautiful (these are the actual names now) was in the hands of Jubal the Ugly One for way longer than an Athletic Hero should allow. Later, the Elderly Inventor is commissioned to provide Pellucidar with clocks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 00:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <14b26eb9-2111-4987-9519-9285959a8d43@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #442930 |
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 3:24:35 AM UTC-6, Robert Carnegie wrote: > Later, the Elderly Inventor is commissioned to provide > Pellucidar with clocks. And they end up making the people of Pellucidar so miserable that the Athletic Hero has to pass a law banning clocks from Pellucidar. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | rec.arts.sf.written
csiph-web