Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > misc.writing > #23211 > unrolled thread

Re: 15 million fools

Started byMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
First post2015-12-30 22:19 -0500
Last post2016-01-03 16:09 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 55 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to misc.writing

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-30 22:19 -0500
    Re: 15 million fools James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@gOUTmail.com> - 2015-12-31 09:22 +0100
      Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 17:12 +0000
        Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-31 22:00 -0500
          Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 17:47 +1100
            Re: 15 million fools musika <mUs1Ka@NOSPAMexcite.com> - 2016-01-01 08:16 +0000
              Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 19:30 +1100
            Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 14:58 +0000
              Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:52 -0500
                Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
                  Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:54 -0500
                    Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:09 +0000
            Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:47 -0500
              Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
          Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 14:57 +0000
            Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:54 -0500
              Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:44 +0000
                Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:55 -0500
                  Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:10 +0000
                    Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:32 -0500
                      Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:25 +0000
                        Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 11:56 -0500
                          Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 17:21 +0000
                            Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 17:44 -0500
                              Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:38 +0000
                                Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 23:12 -0500
                                  Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-05 22:16 +0000
                                    Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-05 22:04 -0500
                                      Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 20:09 +0000
    Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 17:11 +0000
      Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-31 22:36 -0500
        Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 18:12 +1100
          Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 22:17 -0500
        Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 11:00 +0000
          Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 19:46 +0000
            Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 19:54 +0000
          Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 22:41 -0500
            Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:46 +0000
              Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:52 -0500
                Re: 15 million fools RH Draney <dadoctah@cox.net> - 2016-01-02 22:03 -0700
                Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-03 17:34 +1100
                Re: 15 million fools Janet <nobody@home.org> - 2016-01-03 11:31 +0000
                  Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:40 -0500
                    Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-04 10:13 +1100
                      Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-05 16:43 -0500
                        Re: 15 million fools Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 17:36 -0500
                Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 18:36 +0000
                  Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:54 -0500
                    Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:27 +0000
                      Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 17:58 -0500
                        Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:40 +0000
              Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 09:06 +0000
                Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:15 +0000
        Re: 15 million fools Charles Bishop <ctbishop@earthlink.net> - 2016-01-02 17:29 -0800
          Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:09 +0000

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#23211 — Re: 15 million fools

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2015-12-30 22:19 -0500
SubjectRe: 15 million fools
Message-ID<7d798b9271lhug8832vd88co16n01aabmi@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>
>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>> a typo!
>>
>> "spelt"
>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>
>> "spelled"
>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>
>Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.


   "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.

   "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
   of the irregular verb. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#23212

FromJames Hogg <Jas.Hogg@gOUTmail.com>
Date2015-12-31 09:22 +0100
Message-ID<n62ofb$n70$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#23211
Mr. B1ack wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>> a typo!
>>> "spelt"
>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>
>>> "spelled"
>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
> 
> 
>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
> 
>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>    of the irregular verb. 

Some American dove in and rescued it.

-- 
James

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23214

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2015-12-31 17:12 +0000
Message-ID<op.yaip3laj86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23212
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:

> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>> a typo!
>>>> "spelt"
>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>
>>>> "spelled"
>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>
>>
>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>
>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>    of the irregular verb.
>
> Some American dove in and rescued it.

I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I save him?

-- 
If breasts had no nipples, they'd be pointless.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23216

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2015-12-31 22:00 -0500
Message-ID<8mqb8b5i0icl9aa4vnf6loou9gnubh738n@4ax.com>
In reply to#23214
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>
>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>
>>>
>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>
>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>
>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>
>I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>save him?


   Tisk ... all about YOU ....... 

   Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
   foundation of ethics - empathy 101.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23218

FromPeter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid>
Date2016-01-01 17:47 +1100
Message-ID<n6578l$j3q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#23216
On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>> save him?
> 
>    Tisk ... all about YOU ....... 
> 
>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.  

Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.

-- 
Peter Moylan                           http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW, Australia

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23220

Frommusika <mUs1Ka@NOSPAMexcite.com>
Date2016-01-01 08:16 +0000
Message-ID<n65cgn$ujo$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#23218
On 01/01/2016 06:47, Peter Moylan wrote:
> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>> save him?
>>
>>     Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>
>>     Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>     foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>
> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>
Is he related to Lauren?

-- 
Ray
UK

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23221

FromPeter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid>
Date2016-01-01 19:30 +1100
Message-ID<n65dak$dj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#23220
On 2016-Jan-01 19:16, musika wrote:
> On 01/01/2016 06:47, Peter Moylan wrote:
>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. 
>>>> But.... the
>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>> save him?
>>>
>>>     Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>
>>>     Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>     foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>
>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>>
> Is he related to Lauren?

Probably not. I first met the name in "The Wizard of Id", when the
wizard accidentally turned the king into a rooster.

-- 
Peter Moylan                           http://www.pmoylan.org
Sailing away to Key Largo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23224

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-01 14:58 +0000
Message-ID<op.yakei8wf86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23218
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:

> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>> save him?
>>
>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>
>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>
> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.

The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain.  Why do you like religious nutters?  Do you believe in the tooth fairy?  Grow up ffs.

-- 
Sex is one of the most wholesome, beautiful and natural experiences that money can buy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23228

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-01 21:52 -0500
Message-ID<2iee8b5gqknmutn9clc9q4sq88oa5ujitt@4ax.com>
In reply to#23224
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>> save him?
>>>
>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>
>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>
>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>
>The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain.  Why do you
>like religious nutters?  Do you believe in the tooth fairy?  Grow up ffs.

   Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent
   all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to
   the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So
   keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE
   stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23233

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
Message-ID<op.yamo5nij86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23228
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>> save him?
>>>>
>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>
>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>
>>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>>
>> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain.  Why do you
>> like religious nutters?  Do you believe in the tooth fairy?  Grow up ffs.
>
>    Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent
>    all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to
>    the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So
>    keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE
>    stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond.

To their own country.

-- 
Fellows, it's often easier to just give in to your wife.  I mean, what's your word against thousands of hers?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23238

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-02 21:54 -0500
Message-ID<k83h8blo3k6gtv3brresceii2adoo0dv5f@4ax.com>
In reply to#23233
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:42:49 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>>> save him?
>>>>>
>>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>>
>>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>>
>>>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>>>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>>>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>>>
>>> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain.  Why do you
>>> like religious nutters?  Do you believe in the tooth fairy?  Grow up ffs.
>>
>>    Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent
>>    all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to
>>    the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So
>>    keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE
>>    stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond.
>
>To their own country.

   Hmm ... seems to have exploded alas ..............

   Maybe the Chinese can build them a nice new island ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23244

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-03 16:09 +0000
Message-ID<op.yan66pwf86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23238
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 02:54:42 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:42:49 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>>>> save him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>>>
>>>>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>>>>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>>>>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>>>>
>>>> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain.  Why do you
>>>> like religious nutters?  Do you believe in the tooth fairy?  Grow up ffs.
>>>
>>>    Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent
>>>    all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to
>>>    the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So
>>>    keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE
>>>    stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond.
>>
>> To their own country.
>
>    Hmm ... seems to have exploded alas ..............

Didn't they get told as kids not to play with semtex?

>    Maybe the Chinese can build them a nice new island ?

Underwater preferably.

-- 
On going to war over religion:
You're basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend. -- Richard Jeni

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23227

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-01 21:47 -0500
Message-ID<ifee8bhc7g0p8povg44mqifo6k6jgiaqhh@4ax.com>
In reply to#23218
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:47:13 +1100, Peter Moylan
<peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:

>On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>> save him?
>> 
>>    Tisk ... all about YOU ....... 
>> 
>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.  
>
>Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.


   Hmm ... do sociopaths enjoy each others company ?  :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23232

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
Message-ID<op.yamo43aq86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23227
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:47:05 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:47:13 +1100, Peter Moylan
> <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>> save him?
>>>
>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>
>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>
>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British
>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I
>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent.
>
>    Hmm ... do sociopaths enjoy each others company ?  :-)

Only if they're white.

-- 
Fellows, it's often easier to just give in to your wife.  I mean, what's your word against thousands of hers?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23223

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-01 14:57 +0000
Message-ID<op.yakeh9w086ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23216
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>
>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>
>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>
>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>> save him?
>
>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>
>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.

Do you have empathy for an idiot?  If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why?  Why does the world need him alive?

-- 
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history--with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23229

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-01 21:54 -0500
Message-ID<tree8b9sbe1c9pdm70t5bagja5uvfh5j0u@4ax.com>
In reply to#23223
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:57:35 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>>
>>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>>
>>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>>
>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>> save him?
>>
>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>
>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>
>Do you have empathy for an idiot ?

   Actually, idiots need the MOST empathy ...

>If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and
>about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why? 

   Because there's hope for improvement. 

>Why does the world need him alive?

   Because he has moral worth. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23234

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-02 20:44 +0000
Message-ID<op.yamo7vyb86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23229
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:54:33 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:57:35 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>>>
>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>> save him?
>>>
>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>
>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>
>> Do you have empathy for an idiot ?
>
>    Actually, idiots need the MOST empathy ...

Nobody needs empathy.

>> If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and
>> about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why?
>
>    Because there's hope for improvement.

Improvement is getting rid of the idiots.  If they want to do that themselves, then why don't you have a jolly good laugh while they're doing it, then enjoy life without them in future?

>> Why does the world need him alive?
>
>    Because he has moral worth.

Morals achieve nothing.

-- 
My penis is 12 inches long, but I don't use it as a rule.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23239

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-02 21:55 -0500
Message-ID<lc3h8bhdinj53mfj4dkkqdt4adj926rnrv@4ax.com>
In reply to#23234
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:44:09 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:54:33 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:57:35 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>> save him?
>>>>
>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>
>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>
>>> Do you have empathy for an idiot ?
>>
>>    Actually, idiots need the MOST empathy ...
>
>Nobody needs empathy.
>
>>> If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and
>>> about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why?
>>
>>    Because there's hope for improvement.
>
>Improvement is getting rid of the idiots.  If they want to do that themselves, then why don't you have a jolly good laugh while they're doing it, then enjoy life without them in future?
>
>>> Why does the world need him alive?
>>
>>    Because he has moral worth.
>
>Morals achieve nothing.


   I'll mark you down as a Donald Trump voter. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23245

From"Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com>
Date2016-01-03 16:10 +0000
Message-ID<op.yan67jkh86ebyl@red.lan>
In reply to#23239
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 02:55:55 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:44:09 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:54:33 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:57:35 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>>> save him?
>>>>>
>>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>>
>>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have empathy for an idiot ?
>>>
>>>    Actually, idiots need the MOST empathy ...
>>
>> Nobody needs empathy.
>>
>>>> If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and
>>>> about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why?
>>>
>>>    Because there's hope for improvement.
>>
>> Improvement is getting rid of the idiots.  If they want to do that themselves, then why don't you have a jolly good laugh while they're doing it, then enjoy life without them in future?
>>
>>>> Why does the world need him alive?
>>>
>>>    Because he has moral worth.
>>
>> Morals achieve nothing.
>
>    I'll mark you down as a Donald Trump voter.

I would if I was in America.  It's almost 50% voting for him in the polls I looked at.

-- 
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#23247

FromMr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net>
Date2016-01-03 17:32 -0500
Message-ID<km6j8bdldoq4307ioqdpromku2frpqjvj5@4ax.com>
In reply to#23245
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:10:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 02:55:55 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:44:09 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:54:33 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:57:35 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>,
>>>>>>>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just
>>>>>>>>>>>> a typo!
>>>>>>>>>>> "spelt"
>>>>>>>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "spelled"
>>>>>>>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results.
>>>>>>>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about.  In my example, lenght is not a word.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death
>>>>>>>>>    of the irregular verb.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some American dove in and rescued it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning.  If I do, it shows
>>>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching.  But.... the
>>>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I
>>>>>>> save him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Tisk ... all about YOU .......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the
>>>>>>    foundation of ethics - empathy 101.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have empathy for an idiot ?
>>>>
>>>>    Actually, idiots need the MOST empathy ...
>>>
>>> Nobody needs empathy.
>>>
>>>>> If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and
>>>>> about to kill himself, would you stop him?  Why?
>>>>
>>>>    Because there's hope for improvement.
>>>
>>> Improvement is getting rid of the idiots.  If they want to do that themselves, then why don't you have a jolly good laugh while they're doing it, then enjoy life without them in future?
>>>
>>>>> Why does the world need him alive?
>>>>
>>>>    Because he has moral worth.
>>>
>>> Morals achieve nothing.
>>
>>    I'll mark you down as a Donald Trump voter.
>
>I would if I was in America.  It's almost 50% voting for him in the polls I looked at.


   Mussolini was popular too. 

   Blend nationalism, xenophobia, paranoia and
   "simple solutions" together and you too can
   become the next Great Dictator. 

   Oh, and that's 50% IN HIS POLITICAL PARTY.
   It remains to be seen if that'd translate into 
   50% in the general election. 

   An added kink is that US elections aren't won by
   direct popular vote ... entire states are won or lost
   and then  contribute their share of "electoral votes" 
   (cast by special reps called "electors"). Our "big"
   states ... California, New York, Florida ... have so
   many electoral votes that they are "must wins" for
   anybody seeking the presidency.

   California and New York are pretty damned "left-
   wing". Trump is not. 

   So, it is possible to get the majority of the popular
   votes yet still lose the election. I think this happened
   to Al Gore when he ran against (GW) Bush. 

   This "electoral college" system was implemented at
   the very beginning because so many in the 1780s were
   illiterate, ill-informed, uneducated, easily-misled
   farmhands and the idea was to insert a layer of
   smarter people between them and whomever would
   be president. It also increased the political clout of
   a few "important" states. 

   An 'elector' doesn't HAVE to abide by the popular vote ... 
   so they are a sort of emergency device to block would-be
   Mussolinis riding a wave of irrational public zeal. 

   Americans are STILL suboptimally-literate, ill-informed,
   under-educated and easily misled ... though far less
   likely to be farmhands. If Trump wins the popular vote
   this may be the first time since the Founding that the
   electors actually intervene in a serious manner. It
   would cause chaos though of course, maybe even
   some sort of coup. 

   We shall see. 

   As horrible as Trump is though, he's STILL preferable
   to Mrs. Clinton. The march of ultraleft idiocy has gone
   too far and Trump would send it crying home to mama.
   Of course, add 25 years or so, and the right-wing idiocy
   level will become objectionable once again ..... nobody
   seems happy with the sensible center. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | misc.writing


csiph-web