Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #193744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-18 18:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-03-26 11:09 +1300 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 231 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-18 18:12 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-20 09:14 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-20 12:23 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 13:44 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 13:43 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 19:50 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Mikey <Mikey.Smith@aol.invalid> - 2025-03-21 15:00 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-21 19:59 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 16:45 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 12:26 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 23:53 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 20:00 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-22 00:45 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 19:57 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 21:49 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-21 22:29 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:29 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 19:59 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 20:14 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 20:29 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-26 01:59 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-22 04:54 -0500
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-22 19:16 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 07:40 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-20 14:26 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 17:58 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-20 15:52 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 20:48 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 12:31 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-21 16:47 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 13:00 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 12:29 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-21 12:40 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 15:56 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-21 22:27 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:36 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-22 14:04 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 17:52 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-22 19:18 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 19:23 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-22 19:17 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 08:18 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-23 12:21 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:00 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 18:06 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:17 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 18:22 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:35 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 18:41 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:54 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 19:11 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-23 21:05 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:22 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 17:31 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-23 22:34 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-24 08:53 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-24 13:39 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-24 10:48 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-24 19:59 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 17:47 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-24 23:12 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 19:36 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 14:42 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 18:57 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-24 23:20 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 19:38 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 17:46 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-25 00:59 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 18:17 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-25 01:30 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:58 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 19:44 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 22:52 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:16 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 23:24 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:40 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 23:45 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:48 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:02 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 21:10 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:26 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-09 18:40 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-04-09 11:51 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-04-10 10:07 +1200
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 18:16 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 19:48 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:08 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 18:14 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-24 19:29 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 17:46 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:09 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-25 06:24 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 02:31 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-23 12:20 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:13 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-23 15:39 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 15:52 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 19:58 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 16:11 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 22:12 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-23 16:02 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 16:09 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 20:25 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 16:34 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 14:43 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-24 09:09 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-03-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 14:51 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 19:06 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 15:26 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-23 19:33 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 14:44 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 17:47 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:11 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 18:13 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:57 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 19:43 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 22:54 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:15 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 23:22 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:36 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 23:43 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 20:49 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:09 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 21:11 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:29 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Rudy Canoza <rc@j.kone.invalid> - 2025-03-25 02:32 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 02:41 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 18:27 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-04-04 16:55 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 20:08 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-04-04 17:10 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-04 20:21 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-04-04 23:11 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 02:50 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-05 16:06 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 16:17 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-04-05 20:42 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 07:42 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 08:07 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 15:44 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 12:46 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 15:59 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-06 13:11 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-07 08:57 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-04-05 15:49 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 16:16 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-06 01:26 +0000
Re: π³οΈβπApple requires too much money and sacrifice of controlπ³οΈβπ πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmendenderer ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2025-04-06 03:18 +0000
Re: π³οΈβπApple requires too much money and sacrifice of controlπ³οΈβπ vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-06 03:35 +0000
Re: π³οΈβπApple requires too much money and sacrifice of controlπ³οΈβπ vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-06 04:31 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-22 19:17 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-23 03:15 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-23 18:01 +1300
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-23 18:08 +1300
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-23 05:37 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 23:33 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 19:13 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 17:47 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-25 00:52 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 21:48 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 19:43 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 22:28 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 19:44 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-25 08:43 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 08:48 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 08:12 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 04:20 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 18:48 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 14:54 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-25 17:24 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-25 18:03 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 07:40 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-26 08:36 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-27 10:05 +1300
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 17:43 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-26 19:05 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 19:17 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 02:25 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 19:49 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 03:30 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 11:57 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 20:15 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-26 16:18 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 07:45 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-27 08:41 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 12:20 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-28 00:44 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 21:20 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 21:53 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-27 22:42 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 01:45 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 07:50 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-28 02:08 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 22:16 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 12:06 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:11 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-28 00:43 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 21:18 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-28 08:26 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-25 14:58 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-26 02:09 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-21 20:33 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 00:00 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:06 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-03-24 21:09 -0700
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 00:25 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 10:13 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 10:20 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-25 11:01 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-26 02:05 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-25 08:47 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-25 10:35 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 10:41 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-26 11:09 +1300
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-26 11:16 +1300
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-03-25 18:53 +0000
Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-03-26 11:09 +1300
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 16:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8lq0ujtpqjkj6b695vlavs7e32e576m8mb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193862 |
Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote: >> My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various >> functions. > >workflows not involving "work" are just flows, any tampon will do. I work extremely hard. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 22:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvu11qo.2t7.Adison@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #193865 |
On 2025-03-23, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote: > >>> My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various >>> functions. >> >>workflows not involving "work" are just flows, any tampon will do. > > > I work extremely hard. Extremely is subjective,and hard is quite sexually explicit, viewer discretion is advised. I work soft, takes a different type of activity to get hard. I think you're a social media shit tosser, and professional moocher. I think, no, know I'm right. -- End Transmission
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 16:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vrppc8$345vf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193861 |
On 3/23/25 15:52, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>>> >>>>> They are running, dude. I'm an Internet presence. Deal with it. >>>> >>>> Sorry, don't buy it. Show the RAM processes usage page, not the Dock, >>>> for that claim. >>>> >>>> Similarly, even if it was true, to go identify just what the workflow is >>>> which actually needs to have 20+ diverse apps running concurrently. >>> >>> Do the math. >> >> I have. That's precisely why I'm asking for what possible workflow >> could require so many concurrent open Apps for one human to allegedly be >> rapidly swapping between. >> >> Workflows are subject to the Laws of Diminishing Returns. For any >> modern system with fast storage (eg, NVMe), the pretense of a >> productivity gains from leaving Apps resident in RAM has functionally >> ended for the Pareto Principle 80% portion. > > > My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various > functions. Since you don't really know what your workflow needs are, your productivity for doing it isn't a factor for you. Get a PC with 8GB RAM .. it will suffice. And make sure to run a pretty screen saver, since that's as much value-added as all of the rest of the things that you're pretending to do. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 16:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4hq0ujtavn5ltkjh5c6sk2hjq75dmd0u6a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193863 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>>>> >>>>>> They are running, dude. I'm an Internet presence. Deal with it. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, don't buy it. Show the RAM processes usage page, not the Dock, >>>>> for that claim. >>>>> >>>>> Similarly, even if it was true, to go identify just what the workflow is >>>>> which actually needs to have 20+ diverse apps running concurrently. >>>> >>>> Do the math. >>> >>> I have. That's precisely why I'm asking for what possible workflow >>> could require so many concurrent open Apps for one human to allegedly be >>> rapidly swapping between. >>> >>> Workflows are subject to the Laws of Diminishing Returns. For any >>> modern system with fast storage (eg, NVMe), the pretense of a >>> productivity gains from leaving Apps resident in RAM has functionally >>> ended for the Pareto Principle 80% portion. >> >> My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various >> functions. > >Since you don't really know what your workflow needs are, your >productivity for doing it isn't a factor for you. I have perfect productivity, actually. >Get a PC with 8GB RAM .. it will suffice. > > >And make sure to run a pretty screen saver, since that's as much >value-added as all of the rest of the things that you're pretending to do. I know what works for me - you can spew whatever nonsense you want, but it's an "OK boomer" thing. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vrpqon$35ng7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193864 |
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various >>> functions. So yeah, mostly idling. >> Since you don't really know what your workflow needs are, your >> productivity for doing it isn't a factor for you. > > > I have perfect productivity, actually. Sure you do. > >> Get a PC with 8GB RAM .. it will suffice. >> >> >> And make sure to run a pretty screen saver, since that's as much >> value-added as all of the rest of the things that you're pretending to do. > > > I know what works for me And yet can only demonstrate it with a screenshot of your taskbar. No cpu or ram usage history.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 16:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mpr0ujtre1bvmgrn56q8ojk9ir7ms10873@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193866 |
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various >>>> functions. > >So yeah, mostly idling. Incorrect. But a lot of real-time chatting, admittedly, some important, some not. >>> Since you don't really know what your workflow needs are, your >>> productivity for doing it isn't a factor for you. >> >> I have perfect productivity, actually. > >Sure you do. I am an author. >>> Get a PC with 8GB RAM .. it will suffice. >>> >>> And make sure to run a pretty screen saver, since that's as much >>> value-added as all of the rest of the things that you're pretending to do. >> >> I know what works for me > >And yet can only demonstrate it with a screenshot of your taskbar. No cpu >or ram usage history. I have surpassed, slightly, the 32 GB RAM I have, in overall memory use including cache, leading to minor swap use. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vrsjln$1l5lu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193861 |
On 2025-03-23 12:52, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>>> >>>>> They are running, dude. I'm an Internet presence. Deal with it. >>>> >>>> Sorry, don't buy it. Show the RAM processes usage page, not the Dock, >>>> for that claim. >>>> >>>> Similarly, even if it was true, to go identify just what the workflow is >>>> which actually needs to have 20+ diverse apps running concurrently. >>> >>> Do the math. >> >> I have. That's precisely why I'm asking for what possible workflow >> could require so many concurrent open Apps for one human to allegedly be >> rapidly swapping between. >> >> Workflows are subject to the Laws of Diminishing Returns. For any >> modern system with fast storage (eg, NVMe), the pretense of a >> productivity gains from leaving Apps resident in RAM has functionally >> ended for the Pareto Principle 80% portion. > > > My "workflow" is just revolving through different apps for various > functions. > I see a lot of dodging of the questions...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 09:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vrrlil$tfu8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193840 |
-hh wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
> On 3/22/25 19:23, Joel wrote:
>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote:
>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> [A souped up Mac mini] would match what I have with Linux [in support of needed apps and use].
>>>>>>> What actual tasks do you use the computer to complete?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keeping everything I run loaded at once.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you run, and what resources does each use?
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png
>>>
>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't
>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently.
>>
>>
>> They are running, dude. I'm an Internet presence. Deal with it.
>
> Sorry, don't buy it. Show the RAM processes usage page, not the Dock,
> for that claim.
>
> Similarly, even if it was true, to go identify just what the workflow is
> which actually needs to have 20+ diverse apps running concurrently.
Audio/Video/MIDI production or tutorials....
... a couple or three software synthesizers
... DSP plugins
... A big-ass DAW like Ardour or a collection of audio or MIDI apps synched via
JACK
... Video editors like Blender, KDENlive, DaVinci Resolve, Lightworks...
... OBS studio for recording tutorials along with webcam and various effects
filters
... Non/New Session Manager to coordinate the setup
More:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZjxyszn44Q
Is Linux Ready for Video Pros? A 2025 Deep Dive
He talks about a ton of Linux software I've never heard of.
--
"So you don't have to, Cindy, but I was wondering if you might
want to go to someplace, you know, with me, sometime."
"Well, I can think of a lot of worse things, David."
"Friday, then?"
"Why not, David, it might even be fun."
-- Dating in Minnesota
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 20:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan$2da6a$d8adaf6b$6b66c2b7$5a991f1@linux.rocks> |
| In reply to | #193875 |
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:09:40 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZjxyszn44Q > > Is Linux Ready for Video Pros? A 2025 Deep Dive > Great link, in principle. I only watched the first 30 seconds of the vid when I realized I was going to be viewing some moley talking head (obvious skin moles on his cheek and above his lip) describing in 20 long minutes what could be better described in print in 2 short minutes. But I agree with the basic thesis. GNU/Linux can handle pro audio/video. The only problem -- and its a biggie -- is that current A/V practitioners are technically incompetent and thus forever locked into commercial "do it all for you with a point and a click" software. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 18:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vrpk5t$2v2e0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193824 |
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> [A souped up Mac mini] would match what I have with Linux [in >>>>>>> support of needed apps and use]. >>>>>> What actual tasks do you use the computer to complete? >>>>> >>>>> Keeping everything I run loaded at once. >>>> >>>> What do you run, and what resources does each use? >>> >>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >> >> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. > > > They are running, dude. I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle easily. Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 14:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrl0ujtuqdb4mg2tgd9n5aojemffs6is0r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193850 |
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> [A souped up Mac mini] would match what I have with Linux [in >>>>>>>> support of needed apps and use]. >>>>>>> What actual tasks do you use the computer to complete? >>>>>> >>>>>> Keeping everything I run loaded at once. >>>>> >>>>> What do you run, and what resources does each use? >>>> >>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>> >>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >> >> They are running, dude. > >I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. >Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle >easily. > >Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements. ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF windows or something. I can eat up RAM. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 19:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvu0mu5.538.Adison@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #193854 |
On 2025-03-23, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> [A souped up Mac mini] would match what I have with Linux [in >>>>>>>>> support of needed apps and use]. >>>>>>>> What actual tasks do you use the computer to complete? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keeping everything I run loaded at once. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you run, and what resources does each use? >>>>> >>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>> >>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>> >>> They are running, dude. >> >>I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. >>Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle >>easily. >> >>Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements. > > > ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a > newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the > image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP > was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF > windows or something. I can eat up RAM. Are people still rolling on the floor laughing? I think even iPhone users stopped rolling on the floor. RMES= rolling my eyes, snickering is the new funny. RMES= rolling my eyes sneering is avant-garde, considered a compliment and sexual inuendo simutaniously. -- End Transmission
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 15:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0o0uj1g7b789vbecegi2bg04k7bkau2t2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193856 |
Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote: >> ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a >> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. > >Are people still rolling on the floor laughing? >I think even iPhone users stopped rolling on the floor. >RMES= rolling my eyes, snickering is the new funny. >RMES= rolling my eyes sneering is avant-garde, considered a compliment >and sexual inuendo simutaniously. You have to realize, I'm speaking to any sane lurkers and the cool posters, not to the throwback posters. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-23 19:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvu0oh6.5tn.Adison@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #193858 |
On 2025-03-23, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: > Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> wrote: > >>> ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a >>> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >>> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >>> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >>> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. >> >>Are people still rolling on the floor laughing? >>I think even iPhone users stopped rolling on the floor. >>RMES= rolling my eyes, snickering is the new funny. >>RMES= rolling my eyes sneering is avant-garde, considered a compliment >>and sexual inuendo simutaniously. > > > You have to realize, I'm speaking to any sane lurkers and the cool > posters, not to the throwback posters. Throwback = majority. Lurkers and cool = extinction event. The lack of children secretly depresses you idiots ;) The mentally ill don't realize they are mentally ill, they just blog. Do I know you, or what? RMES ;) -- End Transmission
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 14:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vrsjoi$1l5lu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193854 |
On 2025-03-23 11:51, Joel wrote: > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> [A souped up Mac mini] would match what I have with Linux [in >>>>>>>>> support of needed apps and use]. >>>>>>>> What actual tasks do you use the computer to complete? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keeping everything I run loaded at once. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you run, and what resources does each use? >>>>> >>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>> >>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>> >>> They are running, dude. >> >> I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. >> Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle >> easily. >> >> Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements. > > > ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a > newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the > image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP > was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF > windows or something. I can eat up RAM. > And yet you won't show the proof...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 19:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cjp3ujt8q0273ljkeu7tbe647333lctnqq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193884 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >On 2025-03-23 11:51, Joel wrote: >> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>> >>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>> >>>> They are running, dude. >>> >>> I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. >>> Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle >>> easily. >>> >>> Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements. >> >> ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a >> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. > >And yet you won't show the proof... I don't have a need to prove to you that I'm telling the truth. I have used a hair of swap, with 32 GB, it happens after a while of running the computer and using things that use RAM. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 17:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vrsueg$1u3ji$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193889 |
On 2025-03-24 16:11, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2025-03-23 11:51, Joel wrote: >>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 3/22/25 17:52, Joel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Take a look at my Cinnamon taskbar: https://i.imgur.com/yPGDm6a.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Um...yeah, so? That you have ~25 Apps on your machine's Dock doesn't >>>>>> mean that you have 25 Apps running concurrently. >>>>> >>>>> They are running, dude. >>>> >>>> I can guarantee you that most will be idling or backgrounded by the OS. >>>> Plus, that's nothing that a mid-range PC or base mac couldn't handle >>>> easily. >>>> >>>> Come back when you have some real demanding computing requirements. >>> >>> ROFL, "come back when you", uh huh, no this is crossposted to a >>> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >>> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >>> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >>> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. >> >> And yet you won't show the proof... > > > I don't have a need to prove to you that I'm telling the truth. Yeah, actually: you do. > I > have used a hair of swap, with 32 GB, it happens after a while of > running the computer and using things that use RAM. So show it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 21:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mj04ujldfmcth908kn938cicg8a5g895f8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193898 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> this [thread] is crossposted to a >>>> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >>>> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >>>> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >>>> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. >>> >>> And yet you won't show the proof... >> >> I don't have a need to prove to you that I'm telling the truth. > >Yeah, actually: > >you do. > >> I >> have used a hair of swap, with 32 GB, it happens after a while of >> running the computer and using things that use RAM. >So show it. Why? What do I need to prove I'm telling you the truth about such a simple matter? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 18:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vrt00g$1u3up$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #193907 |
On 2025-03-24 18:11, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> this [thread] is crossposted to a >>>>> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >>>>> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >>>>> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >>>>> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. >>>> >>>> And yet you won't show the proof... >>> >>> I don't have a need to prove to you that I'm telling the truth. >> >> Yeah, actually: >> >> you do. >> >>> I >>> have used a hair of swap, with 32 GB, it happens after a while of >>> running the computer and using things that use RAM. >> So show it. > > > Why? What do I need to prove I'm telling you the truth about such a > simple matter? > Because it's easy, and if you could show it, you would. Not showing it makes you look like a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-24 21:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0a34uj9pf5r7f4kneahsc4v6qgfq1684mi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #193908 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>> this [thread] is crossposted to a >>>>>> newsgroup populated by people with a pulse. What I showed in the >>>>>> image was actually not as loaded as it will get with my system. GIMP >>>>>> was the only extra thing running, not LibreOffice or any array of PDF >>>>>> windows or something. I can eat up RAM. >>>>> >>>>> And yet you won't show the proof... >>>> >>>> I don't have a need to prove to you that I'm telling the truth. >>> >>> Yeah, actually: >>> >>> you do. >>> >>>> I >>>> have used a hair of swap, with 32 GB, it happens after a while of >>>> running the computer and using things that use RAM. >>> So show it. >> >> >> Why? What do I need to prove I'm telling you the truth about such a >> simple matter? > >Because it's easy, and if you could show it, you would. > >Not showing it makes you look like a liar. Do you think my collection of concurrently running apps would not use any RAM, or something? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | misc.phone.mobile.iphone
csiph-web