Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #194705

Re: Does anyone here have experience with "photofs" fixing photo naming?

From	Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, rec.photo.digital
Subject	Re: Does anyone here have experience with "photofs" fixing photo naming?
Date	2025-04-22 10:32 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vu8js1$do42$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <vu7b6h$3u07r$1@dont-email.me> <vu8d23$s9jj$1@dont-email.me> <m6pshjFfp43U1@mid.individual.net> <uu2cnW2ahPTuWJr1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@supernews.com> <vu8hcr$2t07$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2025-04-22 09:50, Marion wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:36:03 +0000, Tyrone wrote :
> 
> 
>> Not to mention that before last week he was whining that it was impossible to
>> get to the iOS DCIM folder. Because "walled garden".
> 
> Please don't call the Apple ecosystem a "walled garden" when it's really
> more like a subterranean cavern, unlike the real world in almost every way.
> 
>> Now that we have PROVED to him that it easy to do, he has to whine about file
>> names?  What does he expect?  Picture of Arlen at the beach.jpg?
>> IMG-3769275.jpg is a "better" name?
> 
> I wonder if you realize how many millions of people have "whined" about the
> idiotic way Apple iOS does the file naming on their photos files Tyrone?
> 
>> And look how long it took him to accept the FACT that the iOS SMB server
>> worked!  He admitted to "googling furiously" to prove that we were wrong. It
>> never occurred to him to DL the fucking app and TRY IT!
> 
> First off, I didn't say it didn't work - I said I didn't think nix-based
> systems allowed 3rd-party apps to bind to privileged ports, and, I said
> that I couldn't find any documentation saying iOS could - and - let's be
> clear - neither could you - and neither could anyone find that
> documentation.

Actually, you REPEATEDLY claimed it COULD NOT POSSIBLY work.

Because you KNEW how iOS had to behave.

> 
> So the only way to prove that it worked was to try it out, but what you
> don't understand is believing you Apple trolls is like believing that
> Charles Manson didn't do it - even as many still insist he's innocent.
> 
> It's a shock that you Apple trolls have ever been right, as you Apple
> trolls still insist on imaginary iOS functionality day in and day out.
> 
> Do I need to list all the claims Jolly Roger & nospam have made for
> example, where even in the past week Jolly Roger insisted iTunes backs up
> his IPA's off of his iOS device when that is impossible.
> 
>> NOW he is whining about not getting a drive letter assigned in Windows when he
>> connects to the iOS SMB server. But of course it works when conecting to
>> Android. As if the server you are connecting to controls the drive letter in
>> the client (Windows in this case).
> 
> I supplied images. I tried it. You didn't try it. You're just guessing.
> 
> What you're suggesting is to use a *different* mapping mechanism.
> You don't even realize the discrepancy.
> 
> It might work with that different mapping.
> But that's now how it has to work with WebDAV.
> 
> For the record, I will try the mapping using the *DIFFERENT* mechanism that
> you suggest, but that doesn't change the fact that "net use" didn't do it.
> 
> (You'd think they "should" give the same results but they well may not.)

You are SUCH an idiot:

I just turned on "LAN drive" again, and then did the command:

"C:\Users\Alan>net use e: \\iPhone16\DCIM"

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vz7mhzAz7pNhlLKvVeSVKXW2Otv7U_pW/view?usp=share_link>

And lo and behold what do I find in File Explorer's sidebar?

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/100oVcBhbj_0QHFd4-pyAUeAPeczzWiFX/view?usp=share_link>

Thread

csiph-web