Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1733466 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-17 16:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-22 10:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> - 2017-09-17 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-09-21 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2017-09-21 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2017-09-22 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-09-22 10:40 +0200
| From | Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-17 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger |
| Message-ID | <uqIK5-Ea-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The driver would happily accept buswidth of 16/32/64 bytes and program
garbage to its registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
---
drivers/dma/edma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
index 3879f80a4815..c944ea339425 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
@@ -887,8 +887,8 @@ static int edma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
{
struct edma_chan *echan = to_edma_chan(chan);
- if (cfg->src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
- cfg->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
+ if (cfg->src_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
+ cfg->dst_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
return -EINVAL;
memcpy(&echan->cfg, cfg, sizeof(echan->cfg));
--
2.14.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-21 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger |
| Message-ID | <usdiQ-3Se-77@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1733466 |
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> The driver would happily accept buswidth of 16/32/64 bytes and program
> garbage to its registers.
Peter?
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> ---
> drivers/dma/edma.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> index 3879f80a4815..c944ea339425 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> @@ -887,8 +887,8 @@ static int edma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
> {
> struct edma_chan *echan = to_edma_chan(chan);
>
> - if (cfg->src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
> - cfg->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
> + if (cfg->src_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
> + cfg->dst_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> memcpy(&echan->cfg, cfg, sizeof(echan->cfg));
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
~Vinod
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-21 20:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger |
| Message-ID | <useox-4rm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1736937 |
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
On 2017-09-21 20:17, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
>> The driver would happily accept buswidth of 16/32/64 bytes and program
>> garbage to its registers.
>
> Peter?
Well, eDMA as such has no limitation on the buswidth, the addr_width
become ACNT, counter for the inner loop - which we use to represent the
word length. In theory we could support 32K-1 long word with eDMA, which
we actually do in case of memcpy.
But the driver does state that it supports bus width of 1, 2, 3 and 4 bytes.
These are form the past and I never felt the need to check them.
I think it is fine to reject salve config when asking for longer dev
width. I might revisit later if the need comes..
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/edma.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>> index 3879f80a4815..c944ea339425 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>> @@ -887,8 +887,8 @@ static int edma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> {
>> struct edma_chan *echan = to_edma_chan(chan);
>>
>> - if (cfg->src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
>> - cfg->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
>> + if (cfg->src_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
>> + cfg->dst_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> memcpy(&echan->cfg, cfg, sizeof(echan->cfg));
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
>
- Péter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 08:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger |
| Message-ID | <usptE-2Gz-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1736998 |
Stefan, Vinod,
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
On 2017-09-21 21:29, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-09-21 20:17, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
>>> The driver would happily accept buswidth of 16/32/64 bytes and program
>>> garbage to its registers.
>>
>> Peter?
>
> Well, eDMA as such has no limitation on the buswidth, the addr_width
> become ACNT, counter for the inner loop - which we use to represent the
> word length. In theory we could support 32K-1 long word with eDMA, which
> we actually do in case of memcpy.
>
> But the driver does state that it supports bus width of 1, 2, 3 and 4 bytes.
>
> These are form the past and I never felt the need to check them.
>
> I think it is fine to reject salve config when asking for longer dev
> width. I might revisit later if the need comes..
>
> Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
If it is not too late, I have second thoughts about this..
It might be better to remove the src_addr_width/dst_addr_width check
from edma_slave_config() and add all DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_* to
EDMA_DMA_BUSWIDTHS.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/dma/edma.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>> index 3879f80a4815..c944ea339425 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
>>> @@ -887,8 +887,8 @@ static int edma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
>>> {
>>> struct edma_chan *echan = to_edma_chan(chan);
>>>
>>> - if (cfg->src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
>>> - cfg->dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
>>> + if (cfg->src_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ||
>>> + cfg->dst_addr_width >= DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> memcpy(&echan->cfg, cfg, sizeof(echan->cfg));
>>> --
>>> 2.14.1
>>>
>>
>
> - Péter
>
- Péter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: edma: Reject slave configs using a buswidth of 8 and larger |
| Message-ID | <usrF8-3T0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1737206 |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:16:13AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Stefan, Vinod, > > > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > > On 2017-09-21 21:29, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > > > > On 2017-09-21 20:17, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote: > >>> The driver would happily accept buswidth of 16/32/64 bytes and program > >>> garbage to its registers. > >> > >> Peter? > > > > Well, eDMA as such has no limitation on the buswidth, the addr_width > > become ACNT, counter for the inner loop - which we use to represent the > > word length. In theory we could support 32K-1 long word with eDMA, which > > we actually do in case of memcpy. > > > > But the driver does state that it supports bus width of 1, 2, 3 and 4 bytes. > > > > These are form the past and I never felt the need to check them. > > > > I think it is fine to reject salve config when asking for longer dev > > width. I might revisit later if the need comes.. > > > > Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> > > If it is not too late, I have second thoughts about this.. > It might be better to remove the src_addr_width/dst_addr_width check > from edma_slave_config() and add all DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_* to > EDMA_DMA_BUSWIDTHS. fine by me, pls send updated.. -- ~Vinod
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web