Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1735850 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup

Started byJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
First post2017-09-20 17:40 +0200
Last post2017-09-21 17:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-09-20 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-09-21 17:00 +0200

#1735850 — [PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup

FromJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date2017-09-20 17:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/7] buffer: cleanup free_more_memory() flusher wakeup
Message-ID<urPgu-4TY-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
This whole function is... interesting. Change the wakeup call
to the flusher threads to pass in nr_pages == 0, instead of
some random number of pages. This matches more closely what
similar cases do for memory shortage/reclaim.

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Tested-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 170df856bdb9..9471a445e370 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void free_more_memory(void)
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	int nid;
 
-	wakeup_flusher_threads(1024, WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM);
+	wakeup_flusher_threads(0, WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM);
 	yield();
 
 	for_each_online_node(nid) {
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1736747

FromChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date2017-09-21 17:00 +0200
Message-ID<usb7k-2jN-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1735850
Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web