Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1725329 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-01 22:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-09-02 22:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-09-01 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-09-01 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-09-02 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-09-02 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-09-02 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-09-02 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-09-02 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-09-02 22:00 +0200
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions |
| Message-ID | <ul0JH-1AL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
.section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
.type in6_dev_get, @function
in6_dev_getx:
.LFB4673:
.loc 2 4128 0
.cfi_startproc
...
lock; incl 480(%rbx)
js 111f
.pushsection .text.unlikely
111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
.popsection
113:
This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index eaa8ff41f424..c6acdcdb3fc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config X86
select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH
select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
# Causing hangs/crashes, see the commit that added this change for details.
- select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT if BROKEN
+ select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if X86_64
select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* back to the regular execution flow in .text.
*/
#define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \
- ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \
+ ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \
"111:\tlea %[counter], %%" _ASM_CX "\n" \
"112:\t" ASM_UD0 "\n" \
ASM_UNREACHABLE \
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index c076f710de4c..cf0d74b47ae0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -66,12 +66,17 @@ bool ex_handler_refcount(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
* wrapped around) will be set. Additionally, seeing the refcount
* reach 0 will set ZF (Zero Flag: result was zero). In each of
* these cases we want a report, since it's a boundary condition.
- *
+ * The SF case is not reported since it indicates post-boundary
+ * manipulations below zero or above INT_MAX. And if none of the
+ * flags are set, something has gone very wrong, so report it.
*/
if (regs->flags & (X86_EFLAGS_OF | X86_EFLAGS_ZF)) {
bool zero = regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF;
refcount_error_report(regs, zero ? "hit zero" : "overflow");
+ } else if ((regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_SF) == 0) {
+ /* Report if none of OF, ZF, nor SF are set. */
+ refcount_error_report(regs, "unexpected saturation");
}
return true;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
index 8acfc1e099e1..e549bff87c5b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -459,6 +459,7 @@
#define TEXT_TEXT \
ALIGN_FUNCTION(); \
*(.text.hot TEXT_MAIN .text.fixup .text.unlikely) \
+ *(.text..refcount) \
*(.ref.text) \
MEM_KEEP(init.text) \
MEM_KEEP(exit.text) \
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ul1Z8-2jb-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725329 |
On 1 September 2017 at 21:22, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
>
> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
> .type in6_dev_get, @function
> in6_dev_getx:
> .LFB4673:
> .loc 2 4128 0
> .cfi_startproc
> ...
> lock; incl 480(%rbx)
> js 111f
> .pushsection .text.unlikely
> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
> .popsection
> 113:
>
> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index eaa8ff41f424..c6acdcdb3fc6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config X86
> select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH
> select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
> # Causing hangs/crashes, see the commit that added this change for details.
> - select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT if BROKEN
> + select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if X86_64
> select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
> select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> * back to the regular execution flow in .text.
> */
> #define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \
> - ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \
> + ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \
You could also use a .subsection here: those are always emitted out of
line, but into the same section.
> "111:\tlea %[counter], %%" _ASM_CX "\n" \
> "112:\t" ASM_UD0 "\n" \
> ASM_UNREACHABLE \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> index c076f710de4c..cf0d74b47ae0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
> @@ -66,12 +66,17 @@ bool ex_handler_refcount(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
> * wrapped around) will be set. Additionally, seeing the refcount
> * reach 0 will set ZF (Zero Flag: result was zero). In each of
> * these cases we want a report, since it's a boundary condition.
> - *
> + * The SF case is not reported since it indicates post-boundary
> + * manipulations below zero or above INT_MAX. And if none of the
> + * flags are set, something has gone very wrong, so report it.
> */
> if (regs->flags & (X86_EFLAGS_OF | X86_EFLAGS_ZF)) {
> bool zero = regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF;
>
> refcount_error_report(regs, zero ? "hit zero" : "overflow");
> + } else if ((regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_SF) == 0) {
> + /* Report if none of OF, ZF, nor SF are set. */
> + refcount_error_report(regs, "unexpected saturation");
> }
>
> return true;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 8acfc1e099e1..e549bff87c5b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@
> #define TEXT_TEXT \
> ALIGN_FUNCTION(); \
> *(.text.hot TEXT_MAIN .text.fixup .text.unlikely) \
> + *(.text..refcount) \
> *(.ref.text) \
> MEM_KEEP(init.text) \
> MEM_KEEP(exit.text) \
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ul6P8-5AQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725375 |
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 1 September 2017 at 21:22, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
>> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
>> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
>> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
>>
>> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
>> .type in6_dev_get, @function
>> in6_dev_getx:
>> .LFB4673:
>> .loc 2 4128 0
>> .cfi_startproc
>> ...
>> lock; incl 480(%rbx)
>> js 111f
>> .pushsection .text.unlikely
>> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
>> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
>> .popsection
>> 113:
>>
>> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
>> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
>> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
>>
>> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
>> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index eaa8ff41f424..c6acdcdb3fc6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config X86
>> select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH
>> select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
>> # Causing hangs/crashes, see the commit that added this change for details.
>> - select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT if BROKEN
>> + select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
>> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if X86_64
>> select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
>> select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>> index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>> * back to the regular execution flow in .text.
>> */
>> #define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \
>> - ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \
>> + ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \
>
> You could also use a .subsection here: those are always emitted out of
> line, but into the same section.
I considered it (especially after looking to see how you handled it in
the arm64 port) but decided against it in favor of collecting them all
at the end with .text.unlikely.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ulbON-yn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725428 |
On 2 September 2017 at 03:58, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 1 September 2017 at 21:22, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
>>> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
>>> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
>>> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
>>>
>>> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
>>> .type in6_dev_get, @function
>>> in6_dev_getx:
>>> .LFB4673:
>>> .loc 2 4128 0
>>> .cfi_startproc
>>> ...
>>> lock; incl 480(%rbx)
>>> js 111f
>>> .pushsection .text.unlikely
>>> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
>>> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
>>> .popsection
>>> 113:
>>>
>>> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
>>> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
>>> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>>> Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
>>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> index eaa8ff41f424..c6acdcdb3fc6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config X86
>>> select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH
>>> select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
>>> # Causing hangs/crashes, see the commit that added this change for details.
>>> - select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT if BROKEN
>>> + select ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
>>> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if X86_64
>>> select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
>>> select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>>> index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>>> * back to the regular execution flow in .text.
>>> */
>>> #define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \
>>> - ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \
>>> + ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \
>>
>> You could also use a .subsection here: those are always emitted out of
>> line, but into the same section.
>
> I considered it (especially after looking to see how you handled it in
> the arm64 port) but decided against it in favor of collecting them all
> at the end with .text.unlikely.
>
OK. On arm64, I needed this because the out of line sequence refers
back to the inline code, which resulted in section mismatches if the
refcount API is used from __init code. If that problem does not exist
on x86, I guess it doesn't matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 06:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Use unique .text section for refcount exceptions |
| Message-ID | <ul7UR-6wg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725329 |
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:22 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may > move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which > would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline > with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally: > > .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits > .type in6_dev_get, @function > in6_dev_getx: > .LFB4673: > .loc 2 4128 0 > .cfi_startproc > ... > lock; incl 480(%rbx) > js 111f > .pushsection .text.unlikely > 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx > 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff > .popsection > 113: > > This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the > exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF > set so we can see things like this more easily in the future. Closure: gcc-4.8.5 now builds a functional kernel as well, so that aspect of this bug was just a larger a dose of the same toxin. Question below. diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h > index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ > * back to the regular execution flow in .text. > */ > #define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \ > - ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \ > + ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \ Why two dots? (.text.refcount_ex?) -Mike
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ulbc5-62-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725438 |
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:22 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may >> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which >> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline >> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally: >> >> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits >> .type in6_dev_get, @function >> in6_dev_getx: >> .LFB4673: >> .loc 2 4128 0 >> .cfi_startproc >> ... >> lock; incl 480(%rbx) >> js 111f >> .pushsection .text.unlikely >> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx >> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff >> .popsection >> 113: >> >> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the >> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF >> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future. > > Closure: gcc-4.8.5 now builds a functional kernel as well, so that > aspect of this bug was just a larger a dose of the same toxin. Okay, excellent. Thanks for checking! > > Question below. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h > b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h >> index ff871210b9f2..4e44250e7d0d 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ >> * back to the regular execution flow in .text. >> */ >> #define _REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \ >> - ".pushsection .text.unlikely\n" \ >> + ".pushsection .text..refcount\n" \ > > Why two dots? (.text.refcount_ex?) A dot keeps it out of the TEXT_MAIN macro namespace (see cb87481ee89db in -next, which is function names: [a-zA-Z0-9_]) to avoid collisions and so it can be put at the end with text.unlikely to keep the cold code together. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ule0h-1NH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725329 |
* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
>
> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
> .type in6_dev_get, @function
> in6_dev_getx:
> .LFB4673:
> .loc 2 4128 0
> .cfi_startproc
> ...
> lock; incl 480(%rbx)
> js 111f
> .pushsection .text.unlikely
> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
> .popsection
> 113:
>
> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Could you please split this into two patches: one that fixes the .unlikely bug,
the other that re-enables the optimized version?
Should there be any other problem with refcounts this would make any bisection
result more clear-cut.
Thanks,
Ingo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ulmKd-74M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1725484 |
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Using .text.unlikely for refcount exceptions isn't safe because gcc may
>> move entire functions into .text.unlikely (e.g. in6_dev_get()), which
>> would cause any uses of a protected refcount_t function to stay inline
>> with the function, triggering the protection unconditionally:
>>
>> .section .text.unlikely,"ax",@progbits
>> .type in6_dev_get, @function
>> in6_dev_getx:
>> .LFB4673:
>> .loc 2 4128 0
>> .cfi_startproc
>> ...
>> lock; incl 480(%rbx)
>> js 111f
>> .pushsection .text.unlikely
>> 111: lea 480(%rbx), %rcx
>> 112: .byte 0x0f, 0xff
>> .popsection
>> 113:
>>
>> This creates a unique .text section and adds an additional test to the
>> exception handler to WARN in the case of having none of OF, SF, nor ZF
>> set so we can see things like this more easily in the future.
>>
>> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Fixes: 7a46ec0e2f48 ("locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection")
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 7 ++++++-
>> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Could you please split this into two patches: one that fixes the .unlikely bug,
> the other that re-enables the optimized version?
>
> Should there be any other problem with refcounts this would make any bisection
> result more clear-cut.
Certainly!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web