Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1720261 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

Started byColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
First post2017-08-25 18:40 +0200
Last post2017-08-29 15:20 +0200
Articles 6 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-08-25 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static,  makes code smaller Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-25 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static,  makes code smaller Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2017-08-25 20:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static,  makes code smaller Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-25 20:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes  code smaller Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-08-25 20:20 +0200
    [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform/intel-mid: Make several arrays  static, to make code smaller tip-bot for Colin Ian King <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-08-29 15:20 +0200

#1720261 — [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

FromColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2017-08-25 18:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
Message-ID<uipOi-6ni-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Don't populate arrays on the stack, instead make them static .
Makes the object code smaller by 76 bytes:

Before:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   4217	   1540	    128	   5885	   16fd	arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o

After:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   3981	   1700	    128	   5809	   16b1	arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
index ef03852ea6e8..49ec5b94c71f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr, const u32 *states)
 static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 {
 	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
-	const u32 states[] = {
+	static const u32 states[] = {
 		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 
 static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 {
-	const u32 states[] = {
+	static const u32 states[] = {
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
-- 
2.14.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1720284 — Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

FromAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-08-25 19:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
Message-ID<uiq7E-6u6-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720261
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:32 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Don't populate arrays on the stack, instead make them static .
> Makes the object code smaller by 76 bytes:
> 
> Before:
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	
> filename
>    4217	   1540	    128	   5885	   16fd	
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o
> 
> After:
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	
> filename
>    3981	   1700	    128	   5809	   16b1	
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o

Fine by me.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> index ef03852ea6e8..49ec5b94c71f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr
> *pwr, const u32 *states)
>  static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
>  {
>  	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
> -	const u32 states[] = {
> +	static const u32 states[] = {
>  		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr
> *pwr)
>  
>  static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
>  {
> -	const u32 states[] = {
> +	static const u32 states[] = {
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1720331 — Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

FromLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Date2017-08-25 20:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
Message-ID<uir3I-74J-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720261
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:32:06PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr, const u32 *states)
>  static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
>  {
>  	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
> -	const u32 states[] = {
> +	static const u32 states[] = {
>  		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */

That's a known gcc bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68725

There are hundreds of constant compound literals that are generated
on the stack rather than stored in rodata, do you intend to file
patches for all of them?  Adding static everywhere is just a
workaround that bloats the code.  Fixing the root cause in gcc would
make more sense.

Just my 2 cents worth of course.

Thanks,

Lukas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1720334 — Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

FromAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-08-25 20:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
Message-ID<uir3J-74J-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720331
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:51 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:32:06PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
> > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr
> > *pwr, const u32 *states)
> >  static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
> >  {
> >  	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
> > -	const u32 states[] = {
> > +	static const u32 states[] = {
> >  		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
> >  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
> >  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
> 
> That's a known gcc bug:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68725
> 
> There are hundreds of constant compound literals that are generated
> on the stack rather than stored in rodata, do you intend to file
> patches for all of them?  Adding static everywhere is just a
> workaround that bloats the code.  Fixing the root cause in gcc would
> make more sense.

That is a good point.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1720345 — Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller

FromColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2017-08-25 20:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/platform/intel-mid: make several arrays static, makes code smaller
Message-ID<uirn4-7qw-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720334
On 25/08/17 18:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:51 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:32:06PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>>> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
>>> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr
>>> *pwr, const u32 *states)
>>>  static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
>>>  {
>>>  	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
>>> -	const u32 states[] = {
>>> +	static const u32 states[] = {
>>>  		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
>>>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
>>>  		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
>>
>> That's a known gcc bug:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68725
>>
>> There are hundreds of constant compound literals that are generated
>> on the stack rather than stored in rodata, do you intend to file
>> patches for all of them?  Adding static everywhere is just a
>> workaround that bloats the code.  Fixing the root cause in gcc would
>> make more sense.

Hrm.  constifying will specify it won't be changed; section A8.2 of "The
C programming language" 2nd edition states that this specifier "is to
announce that objects may be placed in read-only memory, and perhaps
increase opportunities for optimization".  Emphasis on "may", it can do,
but it does not necessarily have to. The static storage class specifier
will ensure the object is not on the stack for sure.  So I think from my
understanding of the semantics described in K&R 2nd edition:

const - data is read only, and can be put into read-only location if
compiler can (or wants) to do so
static - data will be not stashed on the stack.

So my change is to be totally clear on the intent - make it read only
and ensure it is not populated at run time on the stack.

Colin

> 
> That is a good point.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1722468 — [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform/intel-mid: Make several arrays static, to make code smaller

Fromtip-bot for Colin Ian King <tipbot@zytor.com>
Date2017-08-29 15:20 +0200
Subject[tip:x86/platform] x86/platform/intel-mid: Make several arrays static, to make code smaller
Message-ID<ujOAW-37c-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1720261
Commit-ID:  3308376a914b9c3f57a12072c063814403d983a8
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/3308376a914b9c3f57a12072c063814403d983a8
Author:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:32:06 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:30:16 +0200

x86/platform/intel-mid: Make several arrays static, to make code smaller

Don't populate arrays on the stack, instead make them static.
Makes the object code smaller by 76 bytes:

Before:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   4217	   1540	    128	   5885	   16fd	arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o

After:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   3981	   1700	    128	   5809	   16b1	arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.o

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170825163206.23250-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
index ef03852..49ec5b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pwr.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mid_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr, const u32 *states)
 static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 {
 	/* On Penwell SRAM must stay powered on */
-	const u32 states[] = {
+	static const u32 states[] = {
 		0xf00fffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int pnw_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 
 static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
 {
-	const u32 states[] = {
+	static const u32 states[] = {
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(0) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(1) */
 		0xffffffff,		/* PM_SSC(2) */

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web