Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1699251 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix

Started bySZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
First post2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
Last post2017-07-31 12:30 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> - 2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
    [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> - 2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
    [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> - 2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
    [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> - 2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-07-31 12:30 +0200

#1699251 — [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix

FromSZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
Date2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix
Message-ID<u8ume-7n2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fix styling WARNINGs and Errors of tpm_ibmvtpm.c driver by using checkpatch.pl

SZ Lin (5):
  Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings.
  Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
  Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning
  Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message
  Use __func__ instead of function name

 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--
2.13.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1699253 — [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning

FromSZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
Date2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning
Message-ID<u8ume-7n2-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1699251
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
+       return;
+}

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 23913fc86158..e53b9fb517d9 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-	return;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.13.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1699254 — [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message

FromSZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
Date2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message
Message-ID<u8ume-7n2-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1699251
WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
+                       if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
+                               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for rtce buffer\n");

WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
+       if (!ibmvtpm) {
+               dev_err(dev, "kzalloc for ibmvtpm failed\n");

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index e53b9fb517d9..e75a674b44ac 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -501,10 +501,8 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_size = be16_to_cpu(crq->len);
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_buf = kmalloc(ibmvtpm->rtce_size,
 						    GFP_ATOMIC);
-			if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
-				dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for rtce buffer\n");
+			if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf)
 				return;
-			}
 
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle = dma_map_single(ibmvtpm->dev,
 				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, ibmvtpm->rtce_size,
@@ -584,10 +582,8 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
 		return PTR_ERR(chip);
 
 	ibmvtpm = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ibmvtpm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ibmvtpm) {
-		dev_err(dev, "kzalloc for ibmvtpm failed\n");
+	if (!ibmvtpm)
 		goto cleanup;
-	}
 
 	ibmvtpm->dev = dev;
 	ibmvtpm->vdev = vio_dev;
-- 
2.13.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1699255 — [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"

FromSZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
Date2017-07-29 09:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
Message-ID<u8ume-7n2-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1699251
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
+^I^I         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");$

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index f01d083eced2..23913fc86158 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 
 	if (ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd) {
 		dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
-		         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
+			"Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
 		/* wait for previous command to finish */
 		sig = wait_event_interruptible(ibmvtpm->wq, !ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd);
 		if (sig)
-- 
2.13.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1699907 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2017-07-31 12:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
Message-ID<u9g7w-54B-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1699255
SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> writes:

> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> +^I^I         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");$
>
> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index f01d083eced2..23913fc86158 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
>  
>  	if (ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd) {
>  		dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -		         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
> +			"Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");

There's no reason for that to be on a separate line at all. Just make it
a single line dev_info( ... );

cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web