Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1695704 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-25 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-25 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200
| From | Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-25 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures |
| Message-ID | <u77Bn-2Vd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> writes: > attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. So mark the > non-const structs as const. > > Arvind Yadav (10): > [PATCH v2 01/10] net: cdc_ncm: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 02/10] net: can: at91_can: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 03/10] net: can: janz-ican3: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 04/10] wireless: ipw2200: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 05/10] wireless: ipw2100: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 06/10] wireless: iwlegacy: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 07/10] wireless: iwlegacy: Constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 08/10] arcnet: com20020-pci: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 09/10] net: bonding: constify attribute_group structures. > [PATCH v2 10/10] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures. Via which tree were you planning to push these? Is it ok if I take the wireless patches to my tree? -- Kalle Valo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7o9b-5d2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1695704 |
Hi Kalle, On Tuesday 25 July 2017 06:25 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> writes: > >> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. So mark the >> non-const structs as const. >> >> Arvind Yadav (10): >> [PATCH v2 01/10] net: cdc_ncm: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 02/10] net: can: at91_can: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 03/10] net: can: janz-ican3: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 04/10] wireless: ipw2200: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 05/10] wireless: ipw2100: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 06/10] wireless: iwlegacy: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 07/10] wireless: iwlegacy: Constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 08/10] arcnet: com20020-pci: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 09/10] net: bonding: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 10/10] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures. > Via which tree were you planning to push these? Is it ok if I take the > wireless patches to my tree? > I have push these changes to linux-next branch. you can take this to your branch. ~arvind
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7o9b-5d2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1695704 |
Hi Kalle, On Tuesday 25 July 2017 06:25 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> writes: > >> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. So mark the >> non-const structs as const. >> >> Arvind Yadav (10): >> [PATCH v2 01/10] net: cdc_ncm: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 02/10] net: can: at91_can: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 03/10] net: can: janz-ican3: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 04/10] wireless: ipw2200: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 05/10] wireless: ipw2100: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 06/10] wireless: iwlegacy: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 07/10] wireless: iwlegacy: Constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 08/10] arcnet: com20020-pci: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 09/10] net: bonding: constify attribute_group structures. >> [PATCH v2 10/10] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures. > Via which tree were you planning to push these? Is it ok if I take the > wireless patches to my tree? > I have push these changes to linux-branch. you can take this to your branch. ~arvind
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web