Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures

From	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures
Date	2017-07-25 15:00 +0200
Message-ID	<u77Bn-2Vd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<u1XW1-7MF-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> writes:

> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. So mark the
> non-const structs as const.
>
> Arvind Yadav (10):
>   [PATCH v2 01/10] net: cdc_ncm: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 02/10] net: can: at91_can: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 03/10] net: can: janz-ican3: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 04/10] wireless: ipw2200: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 05/10] wireless: ipw2100: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 06/10] wireless: iwlegacy: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 07/10] wireless: iwlegacy: Constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 08/10] arcnet: com20020-pci: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 09/10] net: bonding: constify attribute_group structures.
>   [PATCH v2 10/10] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures.

Via which tree were you planning to push these? Is it ok if I take the
wireless patches to my tree?

-- 
Kalle Valo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-25 15:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Constify attribute_group structures Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 08:40 +0200

csiph-web