Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1692222 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()'

Started byChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
First post2017-07-19 23:50 +0200
Last post2017-07-20 17:20 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()' Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> - 2017-07-19 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-07-20 09:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-07-20 17:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-07-20 17:20 +0200

#1692222 — [PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()'

FromChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date2017-07-19 23:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] crypto: ixp4xx - Fix error handling path in 'aead_perform()'
Message-ID<u5510-63h-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In commit 0f987e25cb8a, the source processing has been moved in front of
the destination processing, but the error handling path has not been
modified accordingly.
Free resources in the correct order to avoid some leaks.

Fixes: 0f987e25cb8a ("crypto: ixp4xx - Fix false lastlen uninitialised warning")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
index 427cbe012729..1ccbe15b5f16 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
@@ -1088,10 +1088,10 @@ static int aead_perform(struct aead_request *req, int encrypt,
 	BUG_ON(qmgr_stat_overflow(SEND_QID));
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 
-free_buf_src:
-	free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->src, crypt->src_buf);
 free_buf_dst:
 	free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->dst, crypt->dst_buf);
+free_buf_src:
+	free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->src, crypt->src_buf);
 	crypt->ctl_flags = CTL_FLAG_UNUSED;
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1692507

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2017-07-20 09:40 +0200
Message-ID<u5ee1-46l-77@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1692222
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> In commit 0f987e25cb8a, the source processing has been moved in front of
> the destination processing, but the error handling path has not been
> modified accordingly.
> Free resources in the correct order to avoid some leaks.
>
> Fixes: 0f987e25cb8a ("crypto: ixp4xx - Fix false lastlen uninitialised warning")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Thanks for spotting my mistake!

I've looked at it again and think it's unfortunately still wrong with
your patch,
as there is a 'goto free_buf_src' after dma_pool_alloc(), and that now needs
to jump to free_buf_dst instead. We may also need an extra check to make
sure we don't free an uninitialized pointer again.

Can you have a look at this version below and send whatever you find
to be correct in the end?

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
index 427cbe012729..08b740dddb20 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ static int aead_perform(struct aead_request
*req, int encrypt,
                req_ctx->hmac_virt = dma_pool_alloc(buffer_pool, flags,
                                &crypt->icv_rev_aes);
                if (unlikely(!req_ctx->hmac_virt))
-                       goto free_buf_src;
+                       goto free_buf_dst;
                if (!encrypt) {
                        scatterwalk_map_and_copy(req_ctx->hmac_virt,
                                req->src, cryptlen, authsize, 0);
@@ -1088,10 +1088,11 @@ static int aead_perform(struct aead_request
*req, int encrypt,
        BUG_ON(qmgr_stat_overflow(SEND_QID));
        return -EINPROGRESS;

+free_buf_dst:
+       if (crypt->dst)
+               free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->dst, crypt->dst_buf);
 free_buf_src:
        free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->src, crypt->src_buf);
-free_buf_dst:
-       free_buf_chain(dev, req_ctx->dst, crypt->dst_buf);
        crypt->ctl_flags = CTL_FLAG_UNUSED;
        return -ENOMEM;
 }

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1693011

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2017-07-20 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<u5lfr-JN-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1692507
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> In commit 0f987e25cb8a, the source processing has been moved in front of
>> the destination processing, but the error handling path has not been
>> modified accordingly.
>> Free resources in the correct order to avoid some leaks.
>>
>> Fixes: 0f987e25cb8a ("crypto: ixp4xx - Fix false lastlen uninitialised warning")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>
> Thanks for spotting my mistake!
>
> I've looked at it again and think it's unfortunately still wrong with
> your patch,
> as there is a 'goto free_buf_src' after dma_pool_alloc(), and that now needs
> to jump to free_buf_dst instead. We may also need an extra check to make
> sure we don't free an uninitialized pointer again.
>
> Can you have a look at this version below and send whatever you find
> to be correct in the end?
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Coincidentally, I just came across an older patch of mine that actually
fixes the warning properly, but that for some reason ended up not
getting merged:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8236811/

How about we just revert my broken 0f987e25cb8a patch, and I apply
the mach-ixp4xx patch instead?

       Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1693021

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2017-07-20 17:20 +0200
Message-ID<u5lp8-Nj-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1693011
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> Coincidentally, I just came across an older patch of mine that actually
> fixes the warning properly, but that for some reason ended up not
> getting merged:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8236811/
>
> How about we just revert my broken 0f987e25cb8a patch, and I apply
> the mach-ixp4xx patch instead?

Nevermind that, I just tried it and the warning is back after reverting my
0f987e25cb8a patch, regardless of the indirect-io patch.

         Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web