Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1689029 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static

Started byCarlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
First post2017-07-17 15:20 +0200
Last post2017-07-17 21:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com> - 2017-07-17 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll()  static Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> - 2017-07-17 15:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 21:40 +0200

#1689029 — [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static

FromCarlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
Date2017-07-17 15:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static
Message-ID<u4e6m-5An-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warnings:
- symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
- symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
---
Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714

 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
 	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
 }

-void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
+static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
 				      u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
 {
 	u32 retries, val;
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
 	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
 }

-int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
+static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
 				    u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
 {
 	int type;
--
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689037 — Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static

FromJoao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Date2017-07-17 15:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static
Message-ID<u4eg3-5DQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1689029
Hi Carlos,

Às 2:13 PM de 7/17/2017, Carlos Palminha escreveu:
> Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
> so make it static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
> - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
> ---
> Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
> 
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>  }
> 
> -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
>  				      u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
>  {
>  	u32 retries, val;
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
>  }
> 
> -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
> +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
>  				    u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
>  {
>  	int type;
> --
> 2.11.0
> 

That indeed escaped in the refactoring :) Thanks!

Acked-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1689391

From"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-17 21:40 +0200
Message-ID<u4k26-LB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1689037
On Monday, July 17, 2017 9:28 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> Às 2:13 PM de 7/17/2017, Carlos Palminha escreveu:
> > Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global
> scope,
> > so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warnings:
> > - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
> > - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
> > ---
> > Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
> >
> >  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-
> designware.c
> > index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie
> *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> >  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> >  }
> >
> > -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
> int type,
> > +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int
> index, int type,
> >  				      u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
> >  {
> >  	u32 retries, val;
> > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie
> *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> >  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> >  }
> >
> > -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int
> bar,
> > +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int
> index, int bar,
> >  				    u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
> >  {
> >  	int type;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> 
> That indeed escaped in the refactoring :) Thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web