Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1685709 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

Started byJaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
First post2017-07-12 13:30 +0200
Last post2017-07-12 14:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay Jaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is  preferred over udelay Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-12 14:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is  preferred over udelay Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> - 2017-07-12 14:40 +0200

#1685709 — [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

FromJaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
Date2017-07-12 13:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Message-ID<u2o09-7C7-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fix checkpatch issue: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay;

Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
index d3203f8..1ba4cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 #define DRV_VERSION "2.10"
 #define SYNTH_IO_EXTENT	0x04
-#define SWAIT udelay(70)
+#define SWAIT usleep_range(70, 150)
 #define PROCSPEECH 0x1f
 #define SYNTH_CLEAR 0x03
 
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static const char *synth_immediate(struct spk_synth *synth, const char *buf)
 			if (--timeout <= 0)
 				return oops();
 		outb_p(ch, synth_port);
-		udelay(70);
+		usleep_range(70, 150);
 		buf++;
 	}
 	return NULL;
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1685735 — Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-07-12 14:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Message-ID<u2p5T-8f8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1685709
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:53:53PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Fix checkpatch issue: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
> index d3203f8..1ba4cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_keypc.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  
>  #define DRV_VERSION "2.10"
>  #define SYNTH_IO_EXTENT	0x04
> -#define SWAIT udelay(70)
> +#define SWAIT usleep_range(70, 150)

Ick, why not just get rid of SWAIT entirely please?


>  #define PROCSPEECH 0x1f
>  #define SYNTH_CLEAR 0x03
>  
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static const char *synth_immediate(struct spk_synth *synth, const char *buf)
>  			if (--timeout <= 0)
>  				return oops();
>  		outb_p(ch, synth_port);
> -		udelay(70);
> +		usleep_range(70, 150);

And you are sure it is ok to wait up to 150 long here?

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1685736 — Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay

FromSamuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Date2017-07-12 14:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: speakup_keypc.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Message-ID<u2p5T-8f8-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1685709
Jaya Durga, on mer. 12 juil. 2017 16:53:53 +0530, wrote:
> Fix checkpatch issue: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay;

IIRC synth_immediate is meant to be usable in atomic contexts too, so
usleep can't be used.

Samuel

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web