Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1619651 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

Started byViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
First post2017-04-10 08:30 +0200
Last post2017-04-10 08:50 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-10 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-04-10 08:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-10 08:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-10 08:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2017-04-10 08:50 +0200

#1619651 — Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-04-10 08:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries
Message-ID<tuAZQ-5uN-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

+ Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1619656

FromMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date2017-04-10 08:40 +0200
Message-ID<tuB9v-5xS-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1619651
2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>:
> On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>>
>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
>> unit name, but no reg property
>>
>> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> "reg" property.
>>
>> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>
> --
> viresh


Given that this had already been reported one year before,
the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.

Please drop my Reported-by.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1619657

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-04-10 08:40 +0200
Message-ID<tuB9w-5xS-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1619656
On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>:
> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> >>
> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
> >> unit name, but no reg property
> >>
> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> >> "reg" property.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >
> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >
> > --
> > viresh
> 
> 
> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
> 
> Please drop my Reported-by.

I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
:)

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1619659

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-04-10 08:50 +0200
Message-ID<tuBjc-5Ba-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1619657
On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.
> 
> Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
> Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
> would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
> ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
> with this going directly to arm-soc.

This may end up going via the PM tree.

> I think you need to update also:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt

Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some
DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that
fixed.

> With that change:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> (and implied acked-by)

Thanks.

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1619664

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date2017-04-10 08:50 +0200
Message-ID<tuBjc-5Ba-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1619657
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>:
>> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>> >>
>> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
>> >> unit name, but no reg property
>> >>
>> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> >> "reg" property.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> >
>> > --
>> > viresh
>>
>>
>> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
>> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
>>
>> Please drop my Reported-by.
>
> I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
> :)

Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.

Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
with this going directly to arm-soc.

I think you need to update also:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt
With that change:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
(and implied acked-by)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web