Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1617820 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 11:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2017-04-06 12:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 20:40 +0200

#1617820 — Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery

On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> 
> Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery provides
> power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
> 
> Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> no changes in v3
> 
> changes in v2:
> * fixed typo in commit message
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
>  static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
>  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
>  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,

This certainly assumes some other patchset to be already applied, right?

Which tree is this patchset based on, please?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1617826

On Apr 06 2017 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> 
> > From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> > 
> > Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery provides
> > power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > no changes in v3
> > 
> > changes in v2:
> > * fixed typo in commit message
> > ---
> >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> >  static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
> >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> > +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,
> 
> This certainly assumes some other patchset to be already applied, right?

Hehe, once again you forgot about it, and me to make a note about it
too ;-) 

> 
> Which tree is this patchset based on, please?

Your for-4.8/logitech-hidpp-battery branch :)

Cheers,
Benjamin

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1618261

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> > > Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery provides
> > > power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > no changes in v3
> > > 
> > > changes in v2:
> > > * fixed typo in commit message
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> > >  static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
> > >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> > >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> > > +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,
> > 
> > This certainly assumes some other patchset to be already applied, right?
> 
> Hehe, once again you forgot about it, and me to make a note about it
> too ;-) 

Bah, right; I was pretty sure we've discussed this, but was not able to 
find in anywhere in the history :)

Now queued in for-4.12/logitech-hidpp-battery-power-supply. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web