Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1615213 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support

Started byBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
First post2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
Last post2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
    [PATCH 1/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from  pwm_samsung_config() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
    [PATCH 2/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-04-03 15:50 +0200

#1615213 — [PATCH 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support

FromBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Date2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
Message-ID<tsawO-7yd-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

This patchset fixes suspend/resume support in pwm-samsung
driver (which has an effect of fixing suspend/resume support
for PWM client drivers such as pwm-fan one). Then it removes
no longer needed suspend/resume code from pwm-fan driver.

It was tested on Odroid-XU3 board (with few extra patches
adding SoC/board suspend/resume support which are not in
upstream yet).

The initial issue that has been observed on this configuration
was that after suspend/resume operation the fan was turned on
(while the thermal code had explicitly disabled the fan by
calling back into pwm-fan driver before the suspend/resume).

Fixing this in the pwm-fan driver itself is not feasible since
pwm_config()/pwm_disable() & co. API saves information about
current state and doesn't pass the relevant values to PWM core
if they are identical to the ones used previously (moreover PWM
core itself does the same before calling into the PWM hardware
driver).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics


Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (3):
  pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config()
  pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
  hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code

 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c   | 32 ----------------------
 drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1615215 — [PATCH 1/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config()

FromBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Date2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config()
Message-ID<tsawO-7yd-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1615213
If the requested period_ns and duty_ns values are identical to
the last programmed ones pwm_samsung_config() returns early and
skips the hardware configuration. The same checks are now done
by the PWM core so the driver specific ones can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index f113cda..9ea7638 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -312,9 +312,6 @@ static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	if (period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
-	if (period_ns == chan->period_ns && duty_ns == chan->duty_ns)
-		return 0;
-
 	tcnt = readl(our_chip->base + REG_TCNTB(pwm->hwpwm));
 	oldtcmp = readl(our_chip->base + REG_TCMPB(pwm->hwpwm));
 
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1615219 — [PATCH 2/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support

FromBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Date2017-04-03 15:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
Message-ID<tsawO-7yd-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1615213
Fix suspend/resume support:

- add disabled_mask to struct samsung_pwm_chip to track PWM
  disabled state information in pwm_samsung_{disable,enable}()

- rename pwm_samsung_config() to __pwm_samsung_config() and
  add extra force_period parameter to be used during resume
  (to force tin_ns and tcnt recalculation)

- add pwm_samsung_config() wrapper for preserving old behavior

- properly restore PWM configuration in pwm_samsung_resume()

- remove no longer needed pwm_samsung_suspend()

- update Copyrights

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 9ea7638..aeb39b6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  * Copyright (c) 2008 Simtec Electronics
  *     Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>, <ben-linux@fluff.org>
  * Copyright (c) 2013 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  *
  * PWM driver for Samsung SoCs
  *
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ struct samsung_pwm_channel {
  * @chip:		generic PWM chip
  * @variant:		local copy of hardware variant data
  * @inverter_mask:	inverter status for all channels - one bit per channel
+ * @disabled_mask:	disabled status for all channels - one bit per channel
  * @base:		base address of mapped PWM registers
  * @base_clk:		base clock used to drive the timers
  * @tclk0:		external clock 0 (can be ERR_PTR if not present)
@@ -83,6 +85,7 @@ struct samsung_pwm_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
 	struct samsung_pwm_variant variant;
 	u8 inverter_mask;
+	u8 disabled_mask;
 
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct clk *base_clk;
@@ -257,6 +260,8 @@ static int pwm_samsung_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	tcon |= TCON_START(tcon_chan) | TCON_AUTORELOAD(tcon_chan);
 	writel(tcon, our_chip->base + REG_TCON);
 
+	our_chip->disabled_mask &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -275,6 +280,8 @@ static void pwm_samsung_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	tcon &= ~TCON_AUTORELOAD(tcon_chan);
 	writel(tcon, our_chip->base + REG_TCON);
 
+	our_chip->disabled_mask |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -297,8 +304,8 @@ static void pwm_samsung_manual_update(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
-			      int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				int duty_ns, int period_ns, bool force_period)
 {
 	struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip = to_samsung_pwm_chip(chip);
 	struct samsung_pwm_channel *chan = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
@@ -319,7 +326,7 @@ static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	++tcnt;
 
 	/* Check to see if we are changing the clock rate of the PWM. */
-	if (chan->period_ns != period_ns) {
+	if (chan->period_ns != period_ns || force_period) {
 		unsigned long tin_rate;
 		u32 period;
 
@@ -378,6 +385,12 @@ static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			      int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+{
+	return __pwm_samsung_config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns, false);
+}
+
 static void pwm_samsung_set_invert(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
 				   unsigned int channel, bool invert)
 {
@@ -589,51 +602,41 @@ static int pwm_samsung_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int pwm_samsung_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int pwm_samsung_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = &our_chip->chip;
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	/*
-	 * No one preserves these values during suspend so reset them.
-	 * Otherwise driver leaves PWM unconfigured if same values are
-	 * passed to pwm_config() next time.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; ++i) {
-		struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->chip.pwms[i];
+	for (i = 0; i < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; i++) {
+		struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
 		struct samsung_pwm_channel *chan = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
 
 		if (!chan)
 			continue;
 
-		chan->period_ns = 0;
-		chan->duty_ns = 0;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
+		if (our_chip->variant.output_mask & BIT(i))
+			pwm_samsung_set_invert(our_chip, i,
+					our_chip->inverter_mask & BIT(i));
 
-static int pwm_samsung_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	unsigned int chan;
+		if (chan->period_ns) {
+			__pwm_samsung_config(chip, pwm, chan->duty_ns,
+					     chan->period_ns, true);
+			/* needed to make PWM disable work on Odroid-XU3 */
+			pwm_samsung_manual_update(chip, pwm);
+		}
 
-	/*
-	 * Inverter setting must be preserved across suspend/resume
-	 * as nobody really seems to configure it more than once.
-	 */
-	for (chan = 0; chan < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; ++chan) {
-		if (chip->variant.output_mask & BIT(chan))
-			pwm_samsung_set_invert(chip, chan,
-					chip->inverter_mask & BIT(chan));
+		if (our_chip->disabled_mask & BIT(i))
+			pwm_samsung_disable(chip, pwm);
+		else
+			pwm_samsung_enable(chip, pwm);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_samsung_pm_ops, pwm_samsung_suspend,
-			 pwm_samsung_resume);
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_samsung_pm_ops, NULL, pwm_samsung_resume);
 
 static struct platform_driver pwm_samsung_driver = {
 	.driver		= {
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web