Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1612306 > unrolled thread

[PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports

Started byVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
First post2017-03-29 22:40 +0200
Last post2017-03-30 16:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-03-29 22:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of  ports Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-03-30 16:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-03-30 16:10 +0200

#1612306 — [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports

FromVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date2017-03-29 22:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports
Message-ID<tqsxQ-3KK-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
The current code allocates DSA_MAX_PORTS ports for a Marvell dsa_switch
structure. Provide the exact number of ports so the corresponding
ds->num_ports is accurate.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 955c7e672423..b114bf8e6a11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -4286,7 +4286,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_register_switch(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 	struct device *dev = chip->dev;
 	struct dsa_switch *ds;
 
-	ds = dsa_switch_alloc(dev, DSA_MAX_PORTS);
+	ds = dsa_switch_alloc(dev, mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip));
 	if (!ds)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.12.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1613093 — Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2017-03-30 16:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allocate the number of ports
Message-ID<tqIMi-780-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1612306
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:30:15PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The current code allocates DSA_MAX_PORTS ports for a Marvell dsa_switch
> structure. Provide the exact number of ports so the corresponding
> ds->num_ports is accurate.

Hi Vivien

Is net/dsa/dsa.c: dsa_switch_setup() still used?  If it is, won't that
invalidate your assumption about ds->num_ports.

   Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1613107

FromVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date2017-03-30 16:10 +0200
Message-ID<tqIVX-7qR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1613093
Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:30:15PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> The current code allocates DSA_MAX_PORTS ports for a Marvell dsa_switch
>> structure. Provide the exact number of ports so the corresponding
>> ds->num_ports is accurate.
>
> Is net/dsa/dsa.c: dsa_switch_setup() still used?  If it is, won't that
> invalidate your assumption about ds->num_ports.

I think dsa_switch_setup is part of the legacy code and is likely to be
removed soon.

But this is not an issue per-se. What happens if the switch is allocated
with DSA_MAX_PORTS ports instead of the correct number, is that the PVT
will be programmed to allow the non-existent port IDs to egress frames
on the CPU port and DSA links only.

Thanks,

        Vivien

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web