Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1601460 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes

Started by<gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
First post2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
Last post2017-03-16 09:20 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
    [PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32f4: fix timeout management for pll and ready gate <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-15 21:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-03-16 09:20 +0100

#1601460 — [PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes

From<gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Date2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/2] STM32F4 clock fixes
Message-ID<tlips-wL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

This patch-set contains 2 fixes.
One concerning exclusion of wrong values for PLLQ (0 & 1)
And the second is a fix about timeout management of PLL and LSE/LSI clocks.

Gabriel Fernandez (2):
  clk: stm32f4: fix: exclude values 0 and 1 for PLLQ
  clk: stm32f4: fix timeout management for pll and ready gate

 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1601465 — [PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32f4: fix timeout management for pll and ready gate

From<gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Date2017-03-15 15:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32f4: fix timeout management for pll and ready gate
Message-ID<tlipt-wL-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1601460
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

Use a classic polling to test bit ready.
And the shift of the bit ready of LSE & LSI were wrongs.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
index cf9449b3..68e2a4e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -531,19 +531,26 @@ static int stm32f4_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
 	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
 }
 
+#define PLL_TIMEOUT 10000
+
 static int stm32f4_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(hw);
 	struct stm32f4_pll *pll = to_stm32f4_pll(gate);
-	int ret = 0;
-	unsigned long reg;
+	int bit_status;
+	unsigned int timeout = PLL_TIMEOUT;
 
-	ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
+	if (clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw))
+		return 0;
+
+	clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
 
-	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(base + STM32F4_RCC_CR, reg,
-			reg & (1 << pll->bit_rdy_idx), 0, 10000);
+	do {
+		bit_status = !(readl(gate->reg) & BIT(pll->bit_rdy_idx));
 
-	return ret;
+	} while (bit_status && --timeout);
+
+	return bit_status;
 }
 
 static void stm32f4_pll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
@@ -834,24 +841,32 @@ struct stm32_rgate {
 	u8	bit_rdy_idx;
 };
 
-#define RTC_TIMEOUT 1000000
+#define RGATE_TIMEOUT 50000
 
 static int rgclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(hw);
 	struct stm32_rgate *rgate = to_rgclk(gate);
-	u32 reg;
-	int ret;
+	int bit_status;
+	unsigned int timeout = RGATE_TIMEOUT;
+
+	if (clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw))
+		return 0;
 
 	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
 
 	clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
 
-	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(gate->reg, reg,
-			reg & rgate->bit_rdy_idx, 1000, RTC_TIMEOUT);
+	do {
+		bit_status = !(readl(gate->reg) & BIT(rgate->bit_rdy_idx));
+		if (bit_status)
+			udelay(100);
+
+	} while (bit_status && --timeout);
 
 	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
-	return ret;
+
+	return bit_status;
 }
 
 static void rgclk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
@@ -1533,7 +1548,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 	}
 
 	clks[CLK_LSI] = clk_register_rgate(NULL, "lsi", "clk-lsi", 0,
-			base + STM32F4_RCC_CSR, 0, 2, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+			base + STM32F4_RCC_CSR, 0, 1, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_LSI])) {
 		pr_err("Unable to register lsi clock\n");
@@ -1541,7 +1556,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 	}
 
 	clks[CLK_LSE] = clk_register_rgate(NULL, "lse", "clk-lse", 0,
-			base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR, 0, 2, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+			base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR, 0, 1, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_LSE])) {
 		pr_err("Unable to register lse clock\n");
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1601727

FromStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-03-15 21:50 +0100
Message-ID<tlo1Q-4vc-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1601460
On 03/15, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
> 
> This patch-set contains 2 fixes.
> One concerning exclusion of wrong values for PLLQ (0 & 1)
> And the second is a fix about timeout management of PLL and LSE/LSI clocks.

But neither of the patches have a "Fixes" tag. Can you please
indicate what commits they're fixing?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1602052

FromGabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Date2017-03-16 09:20 +0100
Message-ID<tlyNA-3TH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1601727
Hi Stephen,

On 03/15/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/15, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> This patch-set contains 2 fixes.
>> One concerning exclusion of wrong values for PLLQ (0 & 1)
>> And the second is a fix about timeout management of PLL and LSE/LSI clocks.
> But neither of the patches have a "Fixes" tag. Can you please
> indicate what commits they're fixing?
>
Okay i will send a v2 with "Fixes" tags

BR

Gabriel

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web