Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1601927 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-16 05:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-16 19:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 05:50 +0100
Re: [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-16 09:30 +0100
Re: [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-16 17:30 +0100
Re: [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-16 17:50 +0100
Re: [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-16 19:50 +0100
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 05:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error |
| Message-ID | <tlvwl-1oS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello,
commit 4f86a82ff7df ("x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line")
moved __arch_atomic_add_unless() out atomic.h and new KASAN atomic
instrumentation [1] can't see it anymore
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:257:0,
from ./include/linux/atomic.h:4,
from ./include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h:28,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:26,
from ./include/linux/spinlock_types.h:13,
from kernel/bounds.c:13:
./include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h: In function ‘__atomic_add_unless’:
./include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:70:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__arch_atomic_add_unless’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return __arch_atomic_add_unless(v, a, u);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
so we need a declaration of __arch_atomic_add_unless() in arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
[1] lkml.kernel.org/r/7e450175a324bf93c602909c711bc34715d8e8f2.1489519233.git.dvyukov@google.com
-ss
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlyXg-3YD-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1601927 |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> commit 4f86a82ff7df ("x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line")
> moved __arch_atomic_add_unless() out atomic.h and new KASAN atomic
> instrumentation [1] can't see it anymore
>
>
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:257:0,
> from ./include/linux/atomic.h:4,
> from ./include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h:28,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:26,
> from ./include/linux/spinlock_types.h:13,
> from kernel/bounds.c:13:
> ./include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h: In function ‘__atomic_add_unless’:
> ./include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:70:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__arch_atomic_add_unless’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return __arch_atomic_add_unless(v, a, u);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> so we need a declaration of __arch_atomic_add_unless() in arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
>
>
> [1] lkml.kernel.org/r/7e450175a324bf93c602909c711bc34715d8e8f2.1489519233.git.dvyukov@google.com
>
> -ss
Andi, why did you completely remove __arch_atomic_add_unless() from
the header? Don't we need at least a declaration there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlGrM-X3-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1602070 |
> Andi, why did you completely remove __arch_atomic_add_unless() from > the header? Don't we need at least a declaration there? Yes the declaration should be there. I'll send a new patch. -Andi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlGL8-14c-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1602070 |
> Andi, why did you completely remove __arch_atomic_add_unless() from
> the header? Don't we need at least a declaration there?
Actually it's there in my git version:
I wonder where it disappeared.
-/**
- * __atomic_add_unless - add unless the number is already a given value
- * @v: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @a: the amount to add to v...
- * @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
- *
- * Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as @v was not already @u.
- * Returns the old value of @v.
- */
-static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
-{
- int c, old;
- c = atomic_read(v);
- for (;;) {
- if (unlikely(c == (u)))
- break;
- old = atomic_cmpxchg((v), c, c + (a));
- if (likely(old == c))
- break;
- c = old;
- }
- return c;
-}
+int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 19:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlIDf-2mJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1602648 |
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:41:10 -0700 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Andi, why did you completely remove __arch_atomic_add_unless() from
> > the header? Don't we need at least a declaration there?
>
> Actually it's there in my git version:
>
> I wonder where it disappeared.
>
> -/**
> - * __atomic_add_unless - add unless the number is already a given value
> - * @v: pointer of type atomic_t
> - * @a: the amount to add to v...
> - * @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
> - *
> - * Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as @v was not already @u.
> - * Returns the old value of @v.
> - */
> -static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
> -{
> - int c, old;
> - c = atomic_read(v);
> - for (;;) {
> - if (unlikely(c == (u)))
> - break;
> - old = atomic_cmpxchg((v), c, c + (a));
> - if (likely(old == c))
> - break;
> - c = old;
> - }
> - return c;
> -}
> +int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u);
That was me fixing rejects (from
asm-generic-x86-wrap-atomic-operations.patch), incompletely.
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h~x86-atomic-move-__atomic_add_unless-out-of-line-fix
+++ a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ ATOMIC_OPS(xor, ^)
#undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP
#undef ATOMIC_OP
+int __arch_atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u);
+
/**
* arch_atomic_inc_short - increment of a short integer
* @v: pointer to type int
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web