Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1593865 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type assignment

Started byAndrea Ghittino <aghittino@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-07 03:40 +0100
Last post2017-03-07 22:10 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type  assignment Andrea Ghittino <aghittino@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 03:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type  assignment Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-07 20:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type  assignment Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-03-07 22:10 +0100

#1593865 — [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type assignment

FromAndrea Ghittino <aghittino@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-07 03:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix sparse warnings incorrect type assignment
Message-ID<tidcC-AA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fixed sparse warnings
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_ext_params
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] extended_ht_cap_info
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_tx_bf_cap
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51:    got restricted __le32 const [usertype] tx_BF_cap_info
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_capa_info
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] cap_info
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_ext_params
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] extended_ht_cap_info
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_tx_bf_cap
drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51:    got restricted __le32 const [usertype] tx_BF_cap_info


Signed-off-by: Andrea Ghittino <aghittino@gmail.com>
---
Compile tested only

 wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
index 7961d1c..d3b5ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
@@ -2003,13 +2003,13 @@ static int add_station(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 			strStaParams.ht_supported = false;
 		} else {
 			strStaParams.ht_supported = true;
-			strStaParams.ht_capa_info = params->ht_capa->cap_info;
+			strStaParams.ht_capa_info = le16_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->cap_info);
 			strStaParams.ht_ampdu_params = params->ht_capa->ampdu_params_info;
 			memcpy(strStaParams.ht_supp_mcs_set,
 			       &params->ht_capa->mcs,
 			       WILC_SUPP_MCS_SET_SIZE);
-			strStaParams.ht_ext_params = params->ht_capa->extended_ht_cap_info;
-			strStaParams.ht_tx_bf_cap = params->ht_capa->tx_BF_cap_info;
+			strStaParams.ht_ext_params = le16_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->extended_ht_cap_info);
+			strStaParams.ht_tx_bf_cap = le32_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->tx_BF_cap_info);
 			strStaParams.ht_ante_sel = params->ht_capa->antenna_selection_info;
 		}
 
@@ -2075,13 +2075,13 @@ static int change_station(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 			strStaParams.ht_supported = false;
 		} else {
 			strStaParams.ht_supported = true;
-			strStaParams.ht_capa_info = params->ht_capa->cap_info;
+			strStaParams.ht_capa_info = le16_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->cap_info);
 			strStaParams.ht_ampdu_params = params->ht_capa->ampdu_params_info;
 			memcpy(strStaParams.ht_supp_mcs_set,
 			       &params->ht_capa->mcs,
 			       WILC_SUPP_MCS_SET_SIZE);
-			strStaParams.ht_ext_params = params->ht_capa->extended_ht_cap_info;
-			strStaParams.ht_tx_bf_cap = params->ht_capa->tx_BF_cap_info;
+			strStaParams.ht_ext_params = le16_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->extended_ht_cap_info);
+			strStaParams.ht_tx_bf_cap = le32_to_cpu(params->ht_capa->tx_BF_cap_info);
 			strStaParams.ht_ante_sel = params->ht_capa->antenna_selection_info;
 		}
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1594573

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-03-07 20:30 +0100
Message-ID<tisY2-3CB-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1593865
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:11:21PM +0100, Andrea Ghittino wrote:
> Fixed sparse warnings
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_ext_params
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2011:52:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] extended_ht_cap_info
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_tx_bf_cap
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2012:51:    got restricted __le32 const [usertype] tx_BF_cap_info
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_capa_info
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2078:51:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] cap_info
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_ext_params
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2083:52:    got restricted __le16 const [usertype] extended_ht_cap_info
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [assigned] [usertype] ht_tx_bf_cap
> drivers/staging/wilc1000//wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c:2084:51:    got restricted __le32 const [usertype] tx_BF_cap_info
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Ghittino <aghittino@gmail.com>
> ---
> Compile tested only

This commit doesn't tell me if you though about what you are doing at
all.  We get so many commits where people just randomly do random endian
things...  Did you think about this?  Could you resend with a better
commit message?

regards,
dan carpenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1594647

FromDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date2017-03-07 22:10 +0100
Message-ID<tiuwN-4QQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1594573
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:23:04PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This commit doesn't tell me if you though about what you are doing at
> all.  We get so many commits where people just randomly do random endian
> things...  Did you think about this?  Could you resend with a better
> commit message?
> 

The commit message should say what the user visible effects of this
bug fix are going to be.

regards,
dan carpenter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web