Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1592452 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api  ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-03-04 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-03-04 21:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 23:50 +0100

#1592452 — [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings

The ethtool api {get|set}_settings is deprecated.
We move this driver to new api {get|set}_link_ksettings.

As I don't have the hardware, I'd be very pleased if
someone may test this patch.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
index 65077c7..23bac47 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
@@ -1535,32 +1535,33 @@ static int smc_close(struct net_device *dev)
  * Ethtool support
  */
 static int
-smc_ethtool_getsettings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
+smc_ethtool_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
+			       struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
 {
 	struct smc_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
 	int ret;
 
-	cmd->maxtxpkt = 1;
-	cmd->maxrxpkt = 1;
-
 	if (lp->phy_type != 0) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&lp->lock);
-		ret = mii_ethtool_gset(&lp->mii, cmd);
+		ret = mii_ethtool_get_link_ksettings(&lp->mii, cmd);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&lp->lock);
 	} else {
-		cmd->supported = SUPPORTED_10baseT_Half |
+		u32 supported = SUPPORTED_10baseT_Half |
 				 SUPPORTED_10baseT_Full |
 				 SUPPORTED_TP | SUPPORTED_AUI;
 
 		if (lp->ctl_rspeed == 10)
-			ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, SPEED_10);
+			cmd->base.speed = SPEED_10;
 		else if (lp->ctl_rspeed == 100)
-			ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, SPEED_100);
+			cmd->base.speed = SPEED_100;
+
+		cmd->base.autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;
+		cmd->base.port = 0;
+		cmd->base.duplex = lp->tcr_cur_mode & TCR_SWFDUP ?
+			DUPLEX_FULL : DUPLEX_HALF;
 
-		cmd->autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;
-		cmd->transceiver = XCVR_INTERNAL;
-		cmd->port = 0;
-		cmd->duplex = lp->tcr_cur_mode & TCR_SWFDUP ? DUPLEX_FULL : DUPLEX_HALF;
+		ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(
+			cmd->link_modes.supported, supported);
 
 		ret = 0;
 	}
@@ -1569,24 +1570,26 @@ static int smc_close(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 
 static int
-smc_ethtool_setsettings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
+smc_ethtool_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
+			       const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
 {
 	struct smc_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
 	int ret;
 
 	if (lp->phy_type != 0) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&lp->lock);
-		ret = mii_ethtool_sset(&lp->mii, cmd);
+		ret = mii_ethtool_set_link_ksettings(&lp->mii, cmd);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&lp->lock);
 	} else {
-		if (cmd->autoneg != AUTONEG_DISABLE ||
-		    cmd->speed != SPEED_10 ||
-		    (cmd->duplex != DUPLEX_HALF && cmd->duplex != DUPLEX_FULL) ||
-		    (cmd->port != PORT_TP && cmd->port != PORT_AUI))
+		if (cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_DISABLE ||
+		    cmd->base.speed != SPEED_10 ||
+		    (cmd->base.duplex != DUPLEX_HALF &&
+		     cmd->base.duplex != DUPLEX_FULL) ||
+		    (cmd->base.port != PORT_TP && cmd->base.port != PORT_AUI))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 //		lp->port = cmd->port;
-		lp->ctl_rfduplx = cmd->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL;
+		lp->ctl_rfduplx = cmd->base.duplex == DUPLEX_FULL;
 
 //		if (netif_running(dev))
 //			smc_set_port(dev);
@@ -1744,8 +1747,6 @@ static int smc_ethtool_seteeprom(struct net_device *dev,
 
 
 static const struct ethtool_ops smc_ethtool_ops = {
-	.get_settings	= smc_ethtool_getsettings,
-	.set_settings	= smc_ethtool_setsettings,
 	.get_drvinfo	= smc_ethtool_getdrvinfo,
 
 	.get_msglevel	= smc_ethtool_getmsglevel,
@@ -1755,6 +1756,8 @@ static int smc_ethtool_seteeprom(struct net_device *dev,
 	.get_eeprom_len = smc_ethtool_geteeprom_len,
 	.get_eeprom	= smc_ethtool_geteeprom,
 	.set_eeprom	= smc_ethtool_seteeprom,
+	.get_link_ksettings	= smc_ethtool_get_link_ksettings,
+	.set_link_ksettings	= smc_ethtool_set_link_ksettings,
 };
 
 static const struct net_device_ops smc_netdev_ops = {
-- 
1.7.4.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1592455 — Re: [PATCH] net: smsc: smc91x: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Philippe Reynes wrote:
>  
>  //		lp->port = cmd->port;

Hi,

Review looks good.  However, please also update the above comment as
well.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1592615

Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> writes:

> The ethtool api {get|set}_settings is deprecated.
> We move this driver to new api {get|set}_link_ksettings.
>
> As I don't have the hardware, I'd be very pleased if
> someone may test this patch.
I have the hardware.

Do you want anything specific to be tested, like setting full/half duplex or
autoneg through ethtool, or just a driver probe/usage ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1592629

Hi Robert,

On 3/4/17, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> wrote:
> Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The ethtool api {get|set}_settings is deprecated.
>> We move this driver to new api {get|set}_link_ksettings.
>>
>> As I don't have the hardware, I'd be very pleased if
>> someone may test this patch.
> I have the hardware.
>
> Do you want anything specific to be tested, like setting full/half duplex
> or
> autoneg through ethtool, or just a driver probe/usage ?

I would be very nice if you could test the setting of half/full
duplex, speed, ...


> Cheers.
>
> --
> Robert
>

Thanks a lot for this test,

Regards,
Philippe

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web