Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1592264 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/6] multiple checkpatch issues

Started byArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Last post2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Articles 8 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/6] multiple checkpatch issues Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
    [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after  function/struct/union/enum declarations Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-09 14:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after  function/struct/union/enum declarations Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-09 17:30 +0100
    [PATCH 4/6] staging: speakup: Avoid multiple assignments on same line Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
    [PATCH 3/6] staging: speakup: Blank lines removed after an open brace '{' Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
    [PATCH 6/6] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
    [PATCH 2/6] staging: speakup: Logical continuations should be on the previous line Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 21:20 +0100

#1592264 — [PATCH 0/6] multiple checkpatch issues

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/6] multiple checkpatch issues
Message-ID<th1Qd-6jM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Improve readability by fixing multiple checkpatch.pl
issues in speakup driver.

Arushi Singhal (6):
  staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum
    declarations
  staging: speakup: Logical continuations should be on the previous line
  staging: speakup: Blank lines removed after an open brace '{'
  staging: speakup: Avoid multiple assignments on same line
  staging: speakup: fixes braces {} should be used on all arms of this
    statement
  staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written

 drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c     |  1 -
 drivers/staging/speakup/main.c         | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c     |  1 +
 drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c |  1 +
 drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c  |  6 +--
 6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592266 — [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
Message-ID<th1Qd-6jM-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592264
This patch fixes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl
for please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum
declarations.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/main.c         | 1 +
 drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c     | 1 +
 drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
index 01eabc19039c..17df20ec94be 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ enum {
 	CT_Window,
 	CT_Max
 };
+
 #define read_all_mode CT_Max
 
 static struct tty_struct *tty;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c
index 7e6bc3b05da3..9b2626e85042 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ static void start_serial_interrupt(int irq);
 static const struct old_serial_port rs_table[] = {
 	SERIAL_PORT_DFNS
 };
+
 static const struct old_serial_port *serstate;
 static int timeouts;
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c
index 1ebe5012ec0b..e36360f65f36 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static int port_forced;
 static unsigned int synth_portlist[] = {
 		 0x25e, 0x29e, 0x2de, 0x31e, 0x35e, 0x39e, 0
 };
+
 static u_char synth_status;
 
 static struct var_t vars[] = {
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1596067 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-03-09 14:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
Message-ID<tj6iL-5Jn-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592266
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:47:04AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> This patch fixes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl
> for please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum
> declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/speakup/main.c         | 1 +
>  drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c     | 1 +
>  drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

You seem to have sent me many different series of patches for this
driver, some of them the same, some different, some duplicates.  I have
no idea what to apply and what not to apply, so I'm dropping them all
from my patch queue.  Please fix up and resend a _single_ patch series
with your patches so I know what to review and possibly apply.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1596185 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-03-09 17:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] staging: speakup: Add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
Message-ID<tj96W-7HG-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1596067
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:33:50PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>     On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:47:04AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>     > This patch fixes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl
>     > for please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum
>     > declarations.
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
>     > ---
>     >  drivers/staging/speakup/main.c         | 1 +
>     >  drivers/staging/speakup/serialio.c     | 1 +
>     >  drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c | 1 +
>     >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
>     You seem to have sent me many different series of patches for this
>     driver, some of them the same, some different, some duplicates.  I have
>     no idea what to apply and what not to apply, so I'm dropping them all
>     from my patch queue.  Please fix up and resend a _single_ patch series
>     with your patches so I know what to review and possibly apply.
> 
> Hi Greg
> I think the patch series linked below is not confusing and can be applied.
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/outreachy-kernel/arushi|
> sort:relevance/outreachy-kernel/9W_8BejvjwU/reEewnffAwAJ

It's not in my queue at all, all speakup patches are now flushed out, so
if I have not applied it, please resend.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592268 — [PATCH 4/6] staging: speakup: Avoid multiple assignments on same line

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 4/6] staging: speakup: Avoid multiple assignments on same line
Message-ID<th1Qe-6jM-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592264
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning "multiple assignments
should be avoided."

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/main.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
index c1c3ee7dc95a..6c21ae1ae2d3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
@@ -269,9 +269,12 @@ static unsigned char get_attributes(struct vc_data *vc, u16 *pos)
 
 static void speakup_date(struct vc_data *vc)
 {
-	spk_x = spk_cx = vc->vc_x;
-	spk_y = spk_cy = vc->vc_y;
-	spk_pos = spk_cp = vc->vc_pos;
+	spk_x = vc->vc_x;
+	spk_cx = spk_x;
+	spk_y = vc->vc_y;
+	spk_cy = spk_y;
+	spk_pos = vc->vc_pos;
+	spk_cp = spk_pos;
 	spk_old_attr = spk_attr;
 	spk_attr = get_attributes(vc, (u_short *)spk_pos);
 }
@@ -1643,9 +1646,12 @@ static int speak_highlight(struct vc_data *vc)
 		spk_do_flush();
 		spkup_write(speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.highbuf[hc],
 			    speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.highsize[hc]);
-		spk_pos = spk_cp = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rpos[hc];
-		spk_x = spk_cx = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rx[hc];
-		spk_y = spk_cy = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.ry[hc];
+		spk_pos = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rpos[hc];
+		spk_cp = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rpos[hc];
+		spk_x = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rx[hc];
+		spk_cx = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.rx[hc];
+		spk_y = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.ry[hc];
+		spk_cy = speakup_console[vc_num]->ht.ry[hc];
 		return 1;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592269 — [PATCH 3/6] staging: speakup: Blank lines removed after an open brace '{'

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 3/6] staging: speakup: Blank lines removed after an open brace '{'
Message-ID<th1Qe-6jM-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592264
Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{' as reported by
Checkpatch.pl.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c
index edde9e68779e..441f14f07382 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/kobjects.c
@@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static ssize_t message_store_helper(const char *buf, size_t count,
 	enum msg_index_t curmessage;
 
 	while (cp < end) {
-
 		while ((cp < end) && (*cp == ' ' || *cp == '\t'))
 			cp++;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592270 — [PATCH 6/6] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 6/6] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written
Message-ID<th1Qe-6jM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592264
Fixed coding style for null comparisons in speakup driver to be more
consistant with the rest of the kernel coding style.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
index 3d15eec37163..08f68fc2864e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static struct speakup_paste_work speakup_paste_work = {
 
 int speakup_paste_selection(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	if (cmpxchg(&speakup_paste_work.tty, NULL, tty) != NULL)
+	if (cmpxchg(&speakup_paste_work.tty, NULL, tty))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	tty_kref_get(tty);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
index cc984196020f..5910fe0b1365 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void speakup_register_var(struct var_t *var)
 		}
 	}
 	p_header = var_ptrs[var->var_id];
-	if (p_header->data != NULL)
+	if (p_header->data)
 		return;
 	p_header->data = var;
 	switch (p_header->var_type) {
@@ -210,11 +210,11 @@ int spk_set_num_var(int input, struct st_var_header *var, int how)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	var_data->u.n.value = val;
-	if (var->var_type == VAR_TIME && p_val != NULL) {
+	if (var->var_type == VAR_TIME && p_val) {
 		*p_val = msecs_to_jiffies(val);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	if (p_val != NULL)
+	if (p_val)
 		*p_val = val;
 	if (var->var_id == PUNC_LEVEL) {
 		spk_punc_mask = spk_punc_masks[val];
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592272 — [PATCH 2/6] staging: speakup: Logical continuations should be on the previous line

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-03 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/6] staging: speakup: Logical continuations should be on the previous line
Message-ID<th1Qe-6jM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592264
This patch fixes the checkpatch issue:
CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/main.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
index 17df20ec94be..c1c3ee7dc95a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/main.c
@@ -564,18 +564,18 @@ static u_long get_word(struct vc_data *vc)
 		*buf = '\0';
 		synth_printf("%s\n", spk_msg_get(MSG_SPACE));
 		return 0;
-	} else if ((tmpx < vc->vc_cols - 2)
-		   && (ch == SPACE || ch == 0 || IS_WDLM(ch))
-		   && ((char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)&tmp_pos + 1, &temp) >
-		       SPACE)) {
+	} else if ((tmpx < vc->vc_cols - 2) &&
+		   (ch == SPACE || ch == 0 || IS_WDLM(ch)) &&
+		   ((char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)&tmp_pos + 1, &temp) >
+		    SPACE)) {
 		tmp_pos += 2;
 		tmpx++;
 	} else
 		while (tmpx > 0) {
 			ch = (char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)tmp_pos - 1, &temp);
-			if ((ch == SPACE || ch == 0 || IS_WDLM(ch))
-			    && ((char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)tmp_pos, &temp) >
-				SPACE))
+			if ((ch == SPACE || ch == 0 || IS_WDLM(ch)) &&
+			    ((char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)tmp_pos, &temp) >
+			     SPACE))
 				break;
 			tmp_pos -= 2;
 			tmpx--;
@@ -586,8 +586,8 @@ static u_long get_word(struct vc_data *vc)
 		tmp_pos += 2;
 		tmpx++;
 		ch = (char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)tmp_pos, &temp);
-		if ((ch == SPACE) || ch == 0
-		    || (IS_WDLM(buf[cnt - 1]) && (ch > SPACE)))
+		if ((ch == SPACE) || ch == 0 ||
+		    (IS_WDLM(buf[cnt - 1]) && (ch > SPACE)))
 			break;
 		buf[cnt++] = ch;
 	}
@@ -725,8 +725,8 @@ static void spell_word(struct vc_data *vc)
 			synth_printf("%s", str_cap);
 			last_cap = str_cap;
 		}
-		if (this_speakup_key == SPELL_PHONETIC
-		    && (isascii(ch) && isalpha(ch))) {
+		if (this_speakup_key == SPELL_PHONETIC &&
+		    (isascii(ch) && isalpha(ch))) {
 			ch &= 31;
 			cp1 = phonetic[--ch];
 		} else {
@@ -895,8 +895,8 @@ static int get_sentence_buf(struct vc_data *vc, int read_punc)
 	while (start < end) {
 		sentbuf[bn][i] = (char)get_char(vc, (u_short *)start, &tmp);
 		if (i > 0) {
-			if (sentbuf[bn][i] == SPACE && sentbuf[bn][i - 1] == '.'
-			    && numsentences[bn] < 9) {
+			if (sentbuf[bn][i] == SPACE && sentbuf[bn][i - 1] == '.' &&
+			    numsentences[bn] < 9) {
 				/* Sentence Marker */
 				numsentences[bn]++;
 				sentmarks[bn][numsentences[bn]] =
@@ -1280,8 +1280,8 @@ void spk_reset_default_chars(void)
 
 	/* First, free any non-default */
 	for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
-		if (spk_characters[i]
-		    && (spk_characters[i] != spk_default_chars[i]))
+		if (spk_characters[i] &&
+		    (spk_characters[i] != spk_default_chars[i]))
 			kfree(spk_characters[i]);
 	}
 
@@ -2073,8 +2073,8 @@ speakup_key(struct vc_data *vc, int shift_state, int keycode, u_short keysym,
 	tty = vc->port.tty;
 	if (type >= 0xf0)
 		type -= 0xf0;
-	if (type == KT_PAD
-		&& (vt_get_leds(fg_console, VC_NUMLOCK))) {
+	if (type == KT_PAD &&
+	    (vt_get_leds(fg_console, VC_NUMLOCK))) {
 		if (up_flag) {
 			spk_keydown = 0;
 			goto out;
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web