Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1587621 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-24 14:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-24 14:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 12/14] afs: security: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-24 14:20 +0100
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 14:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 12/14] afs: security: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() |
| Message-ID | <tenWW-FB-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com> The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer. According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment: "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer" it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a smaller overhead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., NULL) Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> --- fs/afs/security.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/afs/security.c b/fs/afs/security.c index bfa9d3428383..ecb86a670180 100644 --- a/fs/afs/security.c +++ b/fs/afs/security.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void afs_clear_permits(struct afs_vnode *vnode) mutex_lock(&vnode->permits_lock); permits = vnode->permits; - rcu_assign_pointer(vnode->permits, NULL); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(vnode->permits, NULL); mutex_unlock(&vnode->permits_lock); if (permits)
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web