Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1582892 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

Started byAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
First post2017-02-16 20:40 +0100
Last post2017-02-20 05:50 +0100
Articles 6 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-02-16 20:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when  watchdog is disabled Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-02-17 15:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when  watchdog is disabled Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-02-17 16:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when  watchdog is disabled Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-02-19 18:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when  watchdog is disabled Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-02-20 01:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when  watchdog is disabled Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-02-20 05:50 +0100

#1582892 — [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-02-16 20:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tbA4h-2sg-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
The datasheet states: "When setting the WDDIS bit, and while it is set, the
fields WDV and WDD must not be modified."

Ensure WDDIS is not set when changing the timeout and set it afterwards if
the watchdog was disabled.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - new patch
 drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
index 2c6f5a70ae67..2a60251806d2 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
@@ -90,11 +90,18 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
 	u32 reg;
 
 	reg = wdt_read(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR);
+
+	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
+		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
+
 	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDV;
 	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDD;
 	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(value);
 	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(value);
-	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
+	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
+
+	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
+		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
 
 	wdd->timeout = timeout;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1583498 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2017-02-17 15:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tbS1c-5xl-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1582892
On 02/16/2017 11:30 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> The datasheet states: "When setting the WDDIS bit, and while it is set, the
> fields WDV and WDD must not be modified."
>
> Ensure WDDIS is not set when changing the timeout and set it afterwards if
> the watchdog was disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - new patch
>  drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> index 2c6f5a70ae67..2a60251806d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> @@ -90,11 +90,18 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>  	u32 reg;
>
>  	reg = wdt_read(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR);
> +
> +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
> +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
> +
>  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDV;
>  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDD;
>  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(value);
>  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(value);
> -	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
> +	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
> +
> +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
> +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
>
That means if the watchdog is running, the timeout would not be updated.
It should be updated no matter if it is running or not.

Guenter

>  	wdd->timeout = timeout;
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1583520 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-02-17 16:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tbSue-5X8-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583498
On 17/02/2017 at 06:40:33 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 11:30 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > The datasheet states: "When setting the WDDIS bit, and while it is set, the
> > fields WDV and WDD must not be modified."
> > 
> > Ensure WDDIS is not set when changing the timeout and set it afterwards if
> > the watchdog was disabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - new patch
> >  drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> > index 2c6f5a70ae67..2a60251806d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> > @@ -90,11 +90,18 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> >  	u32 reg;
> > 
> >  	reg = wdt_read(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR);
> > +
> > +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
> > +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
> > +
> >  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDV;
> >  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDD;
> >  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(value);
> >  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(value);
> > -	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
> > +	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
> > +
> > +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
> > +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
> > 
> That means if the watchdog is running, the timeout would not be updated.
> It should be updated no matter if it is running or not.
> 

No, it is enabling the watchdog, then changing WDV and WDD and finally
disabling the watchdog if necessary. So, WDV and WDD are always changed.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1584206 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2017-02-19 18:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tcDCO-1MT-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583520
On 02/17/2017 07:16 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 17/02/2017 at 06:40:33 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/16/2017 11:30 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> The datasheet states: "When setting the WDDIS bit, and while it is set, the
>>> fields WDV and WDD must not be modified."
>>>
>>> Ensure WDDIS is not set when changing the timeout and set it afterwards if
>>> the watchdog was disabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>  - new patch
>>>  drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
>>> index 2c6f5a70ae67..2a60251806d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
>>> @@ -90,11 +90,18 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>>>  	u32 reg;
>>>
>>>  	reg = wdt_read(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR);
>>> +
>>> +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
>>> +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
>>> +
>>>  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDV;
>>>  	reg &= ~AT91_WDT_WDD;
>>>  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(value);
>>>  	reg |= AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(value);
>>> -	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
>>> +	wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg & ~AT91_WDT_WDDIS);
>>> +
>>> +	if (reg & AT91_WDT_WDDIS)
>>> +		wdt_write(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR, reg);
>>>
>> That means if the watchdog is running, the timeout would not be updated.
>> It should be updated no matter if it is running or not.
>>
>
> No, it is enabling the watchdog, then changing WDV and WDD and finally
> disabling the watchdog if necessary. So, WDV and WDD are always changed.
>
You are correct. Sorry for the noise.

Seems odd that the watchdog must be _running_ to change the timeout.
Usually, if there is a restriction, it is the opposite. I hope this
doesn't cause race conditions, where the watchdog fires immediately
after being enabled due to a low timeout.

Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1584292 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-02-20 01:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tcJyx-5on-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1584206
On 19/02/2017 at 08:57:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > That means if the watchdog is running, the timeout would not be updated.
> > > It should be updated no matter if it is running or not.
> > > 
> > 
> > No, it is enabling the watchdog, then changing WDV and WDD and finally
> > disabling the watchdog if necessary. So, WDV and WDD are always changed.
> > 
> You are correct. Sorry for the noise.
> 
> Seems odd that the watchdog must be _running_ to change the timeout.
> Usually, if there is a restriction, it is the opposite. I hope this
> doesn't cause race conditions, where the watchdog fires immediately
> after being enabled due to a low timeout.
> 

While it is difficult to reproduce, I can confirm it races and sometimes
reset the SoC without any good reason. It doesn't matter whether it is
disabled or not

I've raised the issue at Atmel last Thursday so I don't have any answer
yet.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1584344 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2017-02-20 05:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: sama5d4: Fix setting timeout when watchdog is disabled
Message-ID<tcO5b-8mA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1584292
On 02/19/2017 03:52 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 19/02/2017 at 08:57:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> That means if the watchdog is running, the timeout would not be updated.
>>>> It should be updated no matter if it is running or not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, it is enabling the watchdog, then changing WDV and WDD and finally
>>> disabling the watchdog if necessary. So, WDV and WDD are always changed.
>>>
>> You are correct. Sorry for the noise.
>>
>> Seems odd that the watchdog must be _running_ to change the timeout.
>> Usually, if there is a restriction, it is the opposite. I hope this
>> doesn't cause race conditions, where the watchdog fires immediately
>> after being enabled due to a low timeout.
>>
>
> While it is difficult to reproduce, I can confirm it races and sometimes
> reset the SoC without any good reason. It doesn't matter whether it is
> disabled or not
>

Outch :-(.

> I've raised the issue at Atmel last Thursday so I don't have any answer
> yet.
>

Please keep us in the loop.

Thanks,
Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web