Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1582281 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()

Started byByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
First post2017-02-16 03:40 +0100
Last post2017-02-22 06:10 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-02-16 03:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in  push_dl_task() Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-16 18:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in  push_dl_task() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-02-22 06:10 +0100

#1582281 — [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()

FromByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date2017-02-16 03:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()
Message-ID<tbk9b-8g7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq) has BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(task))
when it returns a task other than NULL, which means that task_cpu(task)
must be rq->cpu. So if task == next_task, then task_cpu(next_task) must
be rq->cpu as well. Remove the redundant condition and make code simpler.

By this patch, unnecessary one branch and two LOAD operations in 'if'
statement can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 27737f3..ad8d577 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 		 * then possible that next_task has migrated.
 		 */
 		task = pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq);
-		if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
+		if (task == next_task) {
 			/*
 			 * The task is still there. We don't try
 			 * again, some other cpu will pull it when ready.
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1582725 — Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()

FromDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Date2017-02-16 18:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()
Message-ID<tbyc9-19O-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1582281
On 02/16/2017 03:34 AM, Byungchul Park wrote:
> pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq) has BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(task))
> when it returns a task other than NULL, which means that task_cpu(task)
> must be rq->cpu. So if task == next_task, then task_cpu(next_task) must
> be rq->cpu as well. Remove the redundant condition and make code simpler.
> 
> By this patch, unnecessary one branch and two LOAD operations in 'if'
> statement can be avoided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>

+1

Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>

-- Daniel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1585922 — Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()

FromByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date2017-02-22 06:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in push_dl_task()
Message-ID<tdxlD-4U0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1582281
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:34:16AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq) has BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(task))
> when it returns a task other than NULL, which means that task_cpu(task)
> must be rq->cpu. So if task == next_task, then task_cpu(next_task) must
> be rq->cpu as well. Remove the redundant condition and make code simpler.
> 
> By this patch, unnecessary one branch and two LOAD operations in 'if'
> statement can be avoided.

Hello,

What do you think?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 27737f3..ad8d577 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
>  		 * then possible that next_task has migrated.
>  		 */
>  		task = pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq);
> -		if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
> +		if (task == next_task) {
>  			/*
>  			 * The task is still there. We don't try
>  			 * again, some other cpu will pull it when ready.
> -- 
> 1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web