Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1675693 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-27 15:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-27 15:30 +0200
Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-06-27 16:00 +0200
Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200
Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-28 02:50 +0200
Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [BUG] ftrace: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage |
| Message-ID | <tWYJ4-14q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:51:26 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > Hello Steve, > > I've faced the following RCU warning while I ran ftracetest testcase > "ftrace - function graph filters with stack tracer" on qemu. > The kernel is ftrace/core branch. > > [ 10.919174] ============================= > [ 10.920077] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > [ 10.920977] 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted > [ 10.921828] ----------------------------- > [ 10.922748] /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux/include/trace/events/rcu.h:454 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! > [ 10.924761] > [ 10.924761] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 10.924761] > [ 10.926775] > [ 10.926775] RCU used illegally from idle CPU! > [ 10.926775] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 > [ 10.929176] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state! > [ 10.930525] no locks held by swapper/7/0. > [ 10.931547] > [ 10.931547] stack backtrace: > [ 10.932777] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 > [ 10.934025] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.fc25 04/01/2014 > [ 10.935869] Call Trace: > [ 10.936550] dump_stack+0x86/0xcf > [ 10.937359] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100 > [ 10.938327] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > [ 10.939229] rcu_irq_enter+0x18d/0x1a0 Strange, it triggered in rcu_irq_enter()? > [ 10.939902] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > [ 10.940683] check_stack+0xbb/0x2f0 > [ 10.941333] stack_trace_call+0x3f/0x50 > [ 10.942010] 0xffffffffa0000077 > [ 10.942620] ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x78/0xa8 > [ 10.943342] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > [ 10.944214] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x5/0x90 > [ 10.944937] rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 Hmm, we are tracing rcu_eqs_exit_common. Do you have this commit in this branch? Commit 03ecd3f4 "rcu/tracing: Add rcu_disabled to denote when rcu_irq_enter() will not work" -- Steve > [ 10.945754] rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90 > [ 10.946612] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > [ 10.947414] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90 > [ 10.948091] do_idle+0x116/0x1c0 > [ 10.948797] cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20 > [ 10.949569] start_secondary+0xfa/0x100 > [ 10.950335] secondary_startup_64+0x9f/0x9f > [ 10.951182] > > I attached full log and kconfig. I can reproduce it with just running > following script. > > ---- > cd tools/testing/selftests/ftrace > while true; do > ./ftracetest test.d/ftrace/fgraph-filter-stack.tc > done > ---- > > Thank you, >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tWZc5-1gg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1675693 |
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:29:26 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:51:26 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Hello Steve, > > > > I've faced the following RCU warning while I ran ftracetest testcase > > "ftrace - function graph filters with stack tracer" on qemu. > > The kernel is ftrace/core branch. > > > > [ 10.919174] ============================= > > [ 10.920077] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > > [ 10.920977] 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted > > [ 10.921828] ----------------------------- > > [ 10.922748] /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux/include/trace/events/rcu.h:454 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! > > [ 10.924761] > > [ 10.924761] other info that might help us debug this: > > [ 10.924761] > > [ 10.926775] > > [ 10.926775] RCU used illegally from idle CPU! > > [ 10.926775] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 > > [ 10.929176] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state! > > [ 10.930525] no locks held by swapper/7/0. > > [ 10.931547] > > [ 10.931547] stack backtrace: > > [ 10.932777] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 > > [ 10.934025] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.fc25 04/01/2014 > > [ 10.935869] Call Trace: > > [ 10.936550] dump_stack+0x86/0xcf > > [ 10.937359] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100 > > [ 10.938327] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > > [ 10.939229] rcu_irq_enter+0x18d/0x1a0 > > Strange, it triggered in rcu_irq_enter()? > > > [ 10.939902] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > [ 10.940683] check_stack+0xbb/0x2f0 > > [ 10.941333] stack_trace_call+0x3f/0x50 > > [ 10.942010] 0xffffffffa0000077 > > [ 10.942620] ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x78/0xa8 > > [ 10.943342] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > [ 10.944214] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x5/0x90 > > > [ 10.944937] rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > Hmm, we are tracing rcu_eqs_exit_common. > > > Do you have this commit in this branch? > > Commit 03ecd3f4 "rcu/tracing: Add rcu_disabled to denote when > rcu_irq_enter() will not work" Yes, that is merged. Hmm, I'll check this is correctly enabled again, since this time I couldn't reproduce it. Thank you, > > -- Steve > > > [ 10.945754] rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90 > > [ 10.946612] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > [ 10.947414] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x8c/0x90 > > [ 10.948091] do_idle+0x116/0x1c0 > > [ 10.948797] cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20 > > [ 10.949569] start_secondary+0xfa/0x100 > > [ 10.950335] secondary_startup_64+0x9f/0x9f > > [ 10.951182] > > > > I attached full log and kconfig. I can reproduce it with just running > > following script. > > > > ---- > > cd tools/testing/selftests/ftrace > > while true; do > > ./ftracetest test.d/ftrace/fgraph-filter-stack.tc > > done > > ---- > > > > Thank you, > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tX7CF-71T-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1675718 |
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 07:52:22 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index e354e47..442b409 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,10 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit(bool user)
> if (oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) {
> rdtp->dynticks_nesting += DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE;
> } else {
> + __this_cpu_inc(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
> rdtp->dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE;
> rcu_eqs_exit_common(oldval, user);
> + __this_cpu_dec(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
> }
> }
>
Looks like a good fix to me. Paul want to take this one?
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tX9l7-89M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1676236 |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:57:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 07:52:22 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index e354e47..442b409 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -973,8 +973,10 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit(bool user)
> > if (oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) {
> > rdtp->dynticks_nesting += DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE;
> > } else {
> > + __this_cpu_inc(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
> > rdtp->dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE;
> > rcu_eqs_exit_common(oldval, user);
> > + __this_cpu_dec(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> Looks like a good fix to me. Paul want to take this one?
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Why not?
How urgent is this, as in what release do you need it in? (Default at
this point being v4.14, but non-default available upon request.)
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 2165b0a9bb37f0560f261986783e7c02bb37c353
Author: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:41:25 2017 -0700
rcu/tracing: Set disable_rcu_irq_enter on rcu_eqs_exit()
Set disable_rcu_irq_enter on not only rcu_eqs_enter_common() but also
rcu_eqs_exit(), since rcu_eqs_exit() suffers from the same issue as was
fixed for rcu_eqs_enter_common() by commit 03ecd3f48e57 ("rcu/tracing:
Add rcu_disabled to denote when rcu_irq_enter() will not work").
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ca3076b073e4..2a6b610ef54f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -952,8 +952,10 @@ static void rcu_eqs_exit(bool user)
if (oldval & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK) {
rdtp->dynticks_nesting += DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_VALUE;
} else {
+ __this_cpu_inc(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
rdtp->dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE;
rcu_eqs_exit_common(oldval, user);
+ __this_cpu_dec(disable_rcu_irq_enter);
}
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tX7CF-71T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1675718 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 22:53:56 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > [ 10.919174] ============================= > > > [ 10.920077] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > > > [ 10.920977] 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted > > > [ 10.921828] ----------------------------- > > > [ 10.922748] /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux/include/trace/events/rcu.h:454 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! > > > [ 10.924761] > > > [ 10.924761] other info that might help us debug this: > > > [ 10.924761] > > > [ 10.926775] > > > [ 10.926775] RCU used illegally from idle CPU! > > > [ 10.926775] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 > > > [ 10.929176] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state! > > > [ 10.930525] no locks held by swapper/7/0. > > > [ 10.931547] > > > [ 10.931547] stack backtrace: > > > [ 10.932777] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5+ #1 > > > [ 10.934025] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.fc25 04/01/2014 > > > [ 10.935869] Call Trace: > > > [ 10.936550] dump_stack+0x86/0xcf > > > [ 10.937359] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100 > > > [ 10.938327] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > > > > [ 10.939229] rcu_irq_enter+0x18d/0x1a0 > > > > Strange, it triggered in rcu_irq_enter()? > > > > > [ 10.939902] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > > [ 10.940683] check_stack+0xbb/0x2f0 > > > [ 10.941333] stack_trace_call+0x3f/0x50 > > > [ 10.942010] 0xffffffffa0000077 > > > [ 10.942620] ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x78/0xa8 > > > [ 10.943342] ? rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > > [ 10.944214] ? rcu_idle_exit+0x5/0x90 > > > > > [ 10.944937] rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.53+0x5/0x150 > > > > Hmm, we are tracing rcu_eqs_exit_common. Yes, the Commit 03ecd3f4 fixed only rcu_eqs_enter_common() path, but not rcu_eqs_exit(). > > > > > > Do you have this commit in this branch? > > > > Commit 03ecd3f4 "rcu/tracing: Add rcu_disabled to denote when > > rcu_irq_enter() will not work" > > Yes, that is merged. > > Hmm, I'll check this is correctly enabled again, since this time > I couldn't reproduce it. I could reproduce it again with running full ftracetest (not sure why, but with only fgraph-filter-stack.tc, it is hard to be reproduced. Please see attached patch, after applying that, I didn't see this problem. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web