Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1669569 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag

Started byBrüns, Stefan <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
First post2017-06-19 20:30 +0200
Last post2017-06-21 21:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready  flag Brüns, Stefan <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de> - 2017-06-19 20:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready  flag "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2017-06-19 20:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready  flag Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 21:30 +0200

#1669569 — Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag

FromBrüns, Stefan <Stefan.Bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Date2017-06-19 20:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: adc: Fix polling of INA219 conversion ready flag
Message-ID<tU9B0-6dJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 21:56:54 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:53:35 +0100
> 
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:09:07 +0200
> > 
> > Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> > > While the INA226 has a conversion ready flag (CVRF) in the R/W
> > > Mask/Enable
> > > register with read-to-clear semantics, the corresponding bit of the
> > > INA219
> > > (CNVR) is part of the bus voltage register. The flag is cleared by
> > > reading
> > > the power register.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> > 
> > Again, looks good to me, but I would like input form Marc or Andrew
> > who are more familiar with these devices than me!
> > 
> > Ping me in a week or two if nothing is happening and I look to have
> > lost these!
> 
> Ah Marc's old email is bouncing.  If no one has a more up to
> data address I guess we'll be looking at Andrew to have a chance to
> respond (which is more likely if I actually cc him ;)

Ping ;-)

Kind regards,

Stefan

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1669619

From"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>
Date2017-06-19 20:40 +0200
Message-ID<tU9KJ-6hK-97@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1669569

On 06/19/2017 01:24 PM, Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 21:56:54 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:53:35 +0100
>>
>> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:09:07 +0200
>>>
>>> Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>>>> While the INA226 has a conversion ready flag (CVRF) in the R/W
>>>> Mask/Enable
>>>> register with read-to-clear semantics, the corresponding bit of the
>>>> INA219
>>>> (CNVR) is part of the bus voltage register. The flag is cleared by
>>>> reading
>>>> the power register.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
>>>
>>> Again, looks good to me, but I would like input form Marc or Andrew
>>> who are more familiar with these devices than me!
>>>
>>> Ping me in a week or two if nothing is happening and I look to have
>>> lost these!
>>
>> Ah Marc's old email is bouncing.  If no one has a more up to
>> data address I guess we'll be looking at Andrew to have a chance to
>> respond (which is more likely if I actually cc him ;)
> 
> Ping ;-)
> 

As for me, my silence is approval, nothing looks incorrect to me.

> Kind regards,
> 
> Stefan
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1671978

FromJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date2017-06-21 21:30 +0200
Message-ID<tUTub-26o-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1669619
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:30:31 -0500
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> wrote:

> On 06/19/2017 01:24 PM, Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 21:56:54 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> >> On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:53:35 +0100
> >>
> >> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, 24 May 2017 02:09:07 +0200
> >>>
> >>> Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:  
> >>>> While the INA226 has a conversion ready flag (CVRF) in the R/W
> >>>> Mask/Enable
> >>>> register with read-to-clear semantics, the corresponding bit of the
> >>>> INA219
> >>>> (CNVR) is part of the bus voltage register. The flag is cleared by
> >>>> reading
> >>>> the power register.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>  
> >>>
> >>> Again, looks good to me, but I would like input form Marc or Andrew
> >>> who are more familiar with these devices than me!
> >>>
> >>> Ping me in a week or two if nothing is happening and I look to have
> >>> lost these!  
> >>
> >> Ah Marc's old email is bouncing.  If no one has a more up to
> >> data address I guess we'll be looking at Andrew to have a chance to
> >> respond (which is more likely if I actually cc him ;)  
> > 
> > Ping ;-)
> >   
> 
> As for me, my silence is approval, nothing looks incorrect to me.
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing.
It's late enough in the cycle that any fixes will probably be post
merge window now.  Also this doesn't apply to my fixes-togreg branch
(presumably due to the earlier patches).

Thanks for the ping.

Jonathan
> 
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > Stefan
> >   
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web