Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1665206 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file

Started bySteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
First post2017-06-13 23:20 +0200
Last post2017-06-14 20:50 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-13 23:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> - 2017-06-13 23:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-14 19:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> - 2017-06-14 20:50 +0200

#1665206 — Re: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2017-06-13 23:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/12] tracing: Rename update the enum_map file
Message-ID<tS1od-4EQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:56:53 -0500
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> wrote:

> The enum_map file is used to display a list of symbol
> to name conversions. As its now used to resolve sizeof
> lets update the name and description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 7e06f04..434c840 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -667,30 +667,30 @@ config RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST
>  
>  	 If unsure, say N
>  
> -config TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
> -       bool "Show enum mappings for trace events"
> +config TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
> +       bool "Show eval mappings for trace events"
>         depends on TRACING
>         help
> -        The "print fmt" of the trace events will show the enum names instead
> -	of their values. This can cause problems for user space tools that
> -	use this string to parse the raw data as user space does not know
> +	The "print fmt" of the trace events will show the enum/sizeof names
> +	instead	of their values. This can cause problems for user space tools
> +	that use this string to parse the raw data as user space does not know
>  	how to convert the string to its value.
>  
>  	To fix this, there's a special macro in the kernel that can be used
> -	to convert the enum into its value. If this macro is used, then the
> -	print fmt strings will have the enums converted to their values.
> +	to convert an enum/sizeof into its value. If this macro is used, then
> +	the print fmt strings will be converted to their values.
>  
>  	If something does not get converted properly, this option can be
> -	used to show what enums the kernel tried to convert.
> +	used to show what enums/sizeof the kernel tried to convert.
>  
> -	This option is for debugging the enum conversions. A file is created
> -	in the tracing directory called "enum_map" that will show the enum
> +	This option is for debugging the conversions. A file is created
> +	in the tracing directory called "eval_map" that will show the
>  	names matched with their values and what trace event system they
>  	belong too.
>  
>  	Normally, the mapping of the strings to values will be freed after
>  	boot up or module load. With this option, they will not be freed, as
> -	they are needed for the "enum_map" file. Enabling this option will
> +	they are needed for the "eval_map" file. Enabling this option will
>  	increase the memory footprint of the running kernel.
>  
>  	If unsure, say N
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 676c808..7297e9d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ enum ftrace_dump_mode ftrace_dump_on_oops;
>  /* When set, tracing will stop when a WARN*() is hit */
>  int __disable_trace_on_warning;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
> -/* Map of enums to their values, for "enum_map" file */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
> +/* Map of enums to their values, for "eval_map" file */
>  struct trace_eval_map_head {
>  	struct module			*mod;
>  	unsigned long			length;
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(trace_eval_mutex);
>   * one at the beginning, and one at the end. The beginning item contains
>   * the count of the saved maps (head.length), and the module they
>   * belong to if not built in (head.mod). The ending item contains a
> - * pointer to the next array of saved enum_eval/enum_map items.
> + * pointer to the next array of saved eval_map items.
>   */
>  union trace_eval_map_item {
>  	struct trace_eval_map		map;
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ union trace_eval_map_item {
>  };
>  
>  static union trace_eval_map_item *trace_eval_maps;
> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>  
>  static int tracing_set_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, const char *buf);
>  
> @@ -4717,7 +4717,7 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_fops = {
>  	.write		= tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_write,
>  };
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>  static union trace_eval_map_item *
>  update_eval_map(union trace_eval_map_item *ptr)
>  {
> @@ -4868,15 +4868,15 @@ trace_insert_eval_map_file(struct module *mod, struct trace_eval_map **start,
>  
>  static void trace_create_eval_file(struct dentry *d_tracer)
>  {
> -	trace_create_file("enum_map", 0444, d_tracer,
> +	trace_create_file("eval_map", 0444, d_tracer,
>  			  NULL, &tracing_eval_map_fops);

Hmm, I have to audit some userspace code to see if this is used. The
enum_map was a debug feature, but it could have been used by some tools.

-- Steve


>  }
>  
> -#else /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
> +#else /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>  static inline void trace_create_eval_file(struct dentry *d_tracer) { }
>  static inline void trace_insert_eval_map_file(struct module *mod,
>  			      struct trace_eval_map **start, int len) { }
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>  
>  static void trace_insert_eval_map(struct module *mod,
>  				  struct trace_eval_map **start, int len)
> @@ -7731,7 +7731,7 @@ static void trace_module_add_evals(struct module *mod)
>  	trace_insert_eval_map(mod, mod->trace_evals, mod->num_trace_evals);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>  static void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod)
>  {
>  	union trace_eval_map_item *map;
> @@ -7761,7 +7761,7 @@ static void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod)
>  }
>  #else
>  static inline void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod) { }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>  
>  static int trace_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>  			       unsigned long val, void *data)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1665218

FromJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Date2017-06-13 23:30 +0200
Message-ID<tS1xT-4HZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1665206
Hi,

On 06/13/2017 04:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:56:53 -0500
> Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> The enum_map file is used to display a list of symbol
>> to name conversions. As its now used to resolve sizeof
>> lets update the name and description.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/trace/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>   kernel/trace/trace.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>> index 7e06f04..434c840 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>> @@ -667,30 +667,30 @@ config RING_BUFFER_STARTUP_TEST
>>   
>>   	 If unsure, say N
>>   
>> -config TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
>> -       bool "Show enum mappings for trace events"
>> +config TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>> +       bool "Show eval mappings for trace events"
>>          depends on TRACING
>>          help
>> -        The "print fmt" of the trace events will show the enum names instead
>> -	of their values. This can cause problems for user space tools that
>> -	use this string to parse the raw data as user space does not know
>> +	The "print fmt" of the trace events will show the enum/sizeof names
>> +	instead	of their values. This can cause problems for user space tools
>> +	that use this string to parse the raw data as user space does not know
>>   	how to convert the string to its value.
>>   
>>   	To fix this, there's a special macro in the kernel that can be used
>> -	to convert the enum into its value. If this macro is used, then the
>> -	print fmt strings will have the enums converted to their values.
>> +	to convert an enum/sizeof into its value. If this macro is used, then
>> +	the print fmt strings will be converted to their values.
>>   
>>   	If something does not get converted properly, this option can be
>> -	used to show what enums the kernel tried to convert.
>> +	used to show what enums/sizeof the kernel tried to convert.
>>   
>> -	This option is for debugging the enum conversions. A file is created
>> -	in the tracing directory called "enum_map" that will show the enum
>> +	This option is for debugging the conversions. A file is created
>> +	in the tracing directory called "eval_map" that will show the
>>   	names matched with their values and what trace event system they
>>   	belong too.
>>   
>>   	Normally, the mapping of the strings to values will be freed after
>>   	boot up or module load. With this option, they will not be freed, as
>> -	they are needed for the "enum_map" file. Enabling this option will
>> +	they are needed for the "eval_map" file. Enabling this option will
>>   	increase the memory footprint of the running kernel.
>>   
>>   	If unsure, say N
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index 676c808..7297e9d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ enum ftrace_dump_mode ftrace_dump_on_oops;
>>   /* When set, tracing will stop when a WARN*() is hit */
>>   int __disable_trace_on_warning;
>>   
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
>> -/* Map of enums to their values, for "enum_map" file */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>> +/* Map of enums to their values, for "eval_map" file */
>>   struct trace_eval_map_head {
>>   	struct module			*mod;
>>   	unsigned long			length;
>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(trace_eval_mutex);
>>    * one at the beginning, and one at the end. The beginning item contains
>>    * the count of the saved maps (head.length), and the module they
>>    * belong to if not built in (head.mod). The ending item contains a
>> - * pointer to the next array of saved enum_eval/enum_map items.
>> + * pointer to the next array of saved eval_map items.
>>    */
>>   union trace_eval_map_item {
>>   	struct trace_eval_map		map;
>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ union trace_eval_map_item {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static union trace_eval_map_item *trace_eval_maps;
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>>   
>>   static int tracing_set_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, const char *buf);
>>   
>> @@ -4717,7 +4717,7 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_fops = {
>>   	.write		= tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_write,
>>   };
>>   
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>>   static union trace_eval_map_item *
>>   update_eval_map(union trace_eval_map_item *ptr)
>>   {
>> @@ -4868,15 +4868,15 @@ trace_insert_eval_map_file(struct module *mod, struct trace_eval_map **start,
>>   
>>   static void trace_create_eval_file(struct dentry *d_tracer)
>>   {
>> -	trace_create_file("enum_map", 0444, d_tracer,
>> +	trace_create_file("eval_map", 0444, d_tracer,
>>   			  NULL, &tracing_eval_map_fops);
> 
> Hmm, I have to audit some userspace code to see if this is used. The
> enum_map was a debug feature, but it could have been used by some tools.

I thought perf was using it, but I was mistaken. I didn't find anything 
using it, but to be on the safe side I placed this patch last so it 
could be dropped if a user was found. The CONFIG option seems to be 
disabled in the couple distro's I checked, further indicating that if 
someone is using it, they are seemingly obscure.



>>   }
>>   
>> -#else /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
>> +#else /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>>   static inline void trace_create_eval_file(struct dentry *d_tracer) { }
>>   static inline void trace_insert_eval_map_file(struct module *mod,
>>   			      struct trace_eval_map **start, int len) { }
>> -#endif /* !CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
>> +#endif /* !CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>>   
>>   static void trace_insert_eval_map(struct module *mod,
>>   				  struct trace_eval_map **start, int len)
>> @@ -7731,7 +7731,7 @@ static void trace_module_add_evals(struct module *mod)
>>   	trace_insert_eval_map(mod, mod->trace_evals, mod->num_trace_evals);
>>   }
>>   
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE
>>   static void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod)
>>   {
>>   	union trace_eval_map_item *map;
>> @@ -7761,7 +7761,7 @@ static void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod)
>>   }
>>   #else
>>   static inline void trace_module_remove_evals(struct module *mod) { }
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_ENUM_MAP_FILE */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_EVAL_MAP_FILE */
>>   
>>   static int trace_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>>   			       unsigned long val, void *data)
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1666075

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2017-06-14 19:10 +0200
Message-ID<tSjXP-7Wy-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1665218
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:21:48 -0500
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> wrote:

> > Hmm, I have to audit some userspace code to see if this is used. The
> > enum_map was a debug feature, but it could have been used by some tools.  
> 
> I thought perf was using it, but I was mistaken. I didn't find anything 
> using it, but to be on the safe side I placed this patch last so it 
> could be dropped if a user was found. The CONFIG option seems to be 
> disabled in the couple distro's I checked, further indicating that if 
> someone is using it, they are seemingly obscure.

I pulled in all your patches but the samples one. Could you update that
with a use case as well. You can create some crazy struct that you want
to get the size of, or whatever. Maybe make an array out of it? Or I
can come up with something creative.

I'll start testing your patches and do a push in a few days.

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1666145

FromJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Date2017-06-14 20:50 +0200
Message-ID<tSlwB-jl-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1666075
On 06/14/2017 12:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:21:48 -0500
> Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Hmm, I have to audit some userspace code to see if this is used. The
>>> enum_map was a debug feature, but it could have been used by some tools.
>>
>> I thought perf was using it, but I was mistaken. I didn't find anything
>> using it, but to be on the safe side I placed this patch last so it
>> could be dropped if a user was found. The CONFIG option seems to be
>> disabled in the couple distro's I checked, further indicating that if
>> someone is using it, they are seemingly obscure.
> 
> I pulled in all your patches but the samples one. Could you update that
> with a use case as well. You can create some crazy struct that you want
> to get the size of, or whatever. Maybe make an array out of it? Or I
> can come up with something creative.

I was actually working on that, it seems that the existing sample has 
the problem because of the __print_array(...sizeof(int)) case. So I 
think my general plan was just to update it to TRACE_DEFINE_SIZEOF(int).

Do you want a more complex example?

But this lead me to discover a number of other __print_array() cases 
where people have hardcoded the size, so I was running through those and 
converting them to sizeof() since it should work now.

> 
> I'll start testing your patches and do a push in a few days.
> 
> -- Steve
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web