Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1661080 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-08 13:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-13 04:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> - 2017-06-08 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-12 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> - 2017-06-13 04:50 +0200
| From | Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-08 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc |
| Message-ID | <tQ46R-3JN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
unsynchronized_tsc() checks value of tsc_clocksource_reliable which is set by
check_system_tsc_reliable(). It's better to move check_system_tsc_reliable() at
front, or else this check makes no sense.
Though X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC is usually set for TSC reliable system, just in
case.
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 714dfba..a316bdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -1412,11 +1412,11 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
use_tsc_delay();
+ check_system_tsc_reliable();
+
if (unsynchronized_tsc())
mark_tsc_unstable("TSCs unsynchronized");
- check_system_tsc_reliable();
-
detect_art();
}
--
1.7.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc |
| Message-ID | <tRA4I-4ju-55@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1661080 |
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> unsynchronized_tsc() checks value of tsc_clocksource_reliable which is set by
> check_system_tsc_reliable(). It's better to move check_system_tsc_reliable()
> at
> front, or else this check makes no sense.
>
> Though X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC is usually set for TSC reliable system, just
> in
> case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 714dfba..a316bdd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1412,11 +1412,11 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
> use_tsc_delay();
> + check_system_tsc_reliable();
> +
> if (unsynchronized_tsc())
> mark_tsc_unstable("TSCs unsynchronized");
> - check_system_tsc_reliable();
> -
What kind of patch is that? Definitely nothing which can be applied.
Thanks,
tglx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-13 04:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Calling check_system_tsc_reliable before unsynchronized_tsc |
| Message-ID | <tRK41-2c8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1663829 |
在 2017/6/13 0:03, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>
>> unsynchronized_tsc() checks value of tsc_clocksource_reliable which is set by
>> check_system_tsc_reliable(). It's better to move check_system_tsc_reliable()
>> at
>> front, or else this check makes no sense.
>>
>> Though X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC is usually set for TSC reliable system, just
>> in
>> case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> index 714dfba..a316bdd 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
>> @@ -1412,11 +1412,11 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
>> use_tsc_delay();
>> + check_system_tsc_reliable();
>> +
>> if (unsynchronized_tsc())
>> mark_tsc_unstable("TSCs unsynchronized");
>> - check_system_tsc_reliable();
>> -
> What kind of patch is that? Definitely nothing which can be applied.
To avoid using unassigned variable tsc_clocksource_reliable.
Or what's the purpose of if (tsc_clocksource_reliable) check in
unsynchronized_tsc()?
--
thanks
zduan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web