Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1661566 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus.

Started byGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2017-06-08 20:30 +0200
Last post2017-06-09 17:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus. Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-08 20:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus. Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> - 2017-06-09 15:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus. Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> - 2017-06-09 17:30 +0200

#1661566 — Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus.

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-06-08 20:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus.
Message-ID<tQalY-7K4-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:56:14PM +0200, Felix Schnizlein wrote:
> A few entries have been omitted, due to already existing information in
> sysfs:
> 
> - microcode -> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/microcode/version
> - cache -> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cache/index*/size
> - core_id -> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/core_id
> - siblings -> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/core_siblings_list
> - pyshical_id -> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/physical_package_id
> 
> Following attributes have been removed due to obsolete information or
> legacy processors: wp, power management, f00f bug, coma bug, fdiv bug
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>

Again, no signoff from you?

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile        |   1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/base/cpuinfo.c          |   4 -
>  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c
> 

When you add new sysfs entries, you have to also add new
Documentation/ABI/ entries.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1662409

FromThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Date2017-06-09 15:30 +0200
Message-ID<tQs9b-22p-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1661566
On Thursday, June 08, 2017 08:24:01 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:56:14PM +0200, Felix Schnizlein wrote:
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile        |   1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c | 166 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/base/cpuinfo.c          |   4 -
> >  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c
> > 
> 
> When you add new sysfs entries, you have to also add new
> Documentation/ABI/ entries.

This one seem to be rather unmaintained?
There even is:
Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
this patchset would have to add:
Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu-cpuinfo
then.

But:
Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
describes
/sys/devices/system/cpu/dscr_default
and
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]+/dscr

which I have never seen.

Much more important values in there like:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/topology
/sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/{online,offline}

are not described there at all.

I wonder whether .../cpu/dscr_default still exists in the
kernel, a quick grep did not reveal anything.
A
Source:
tag would be a nice non-optional addition in the README.

We can also send definitions for topology/microcode/cache/..
to catch up a bit there again, not sure that makes much sense.

Be aware that the output of /proc/cpuinfo is rather arbitrary
depending on architecure and some build options.

      Thomas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1662550

FromBrice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Date2017-06-09 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<tQu1j-3gb-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1662409

Le 09/06/2017 15:28, Thomas Renninger a écrit :
> On Thursday, June 08, 2017 08:24:01 PM Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:56:14PM +0200, Felix Schnizlein wrote:
>>> ---
>>>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile        |   1 +
>>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c | 166 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/base/cpuinfo.c          |   4 -
>>>  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpuinfo_sysfs.c
>>>
>> When you add new sysfs entries, you have to also add new
>> Documentation/ABI/ entries.
> This one seem to be rather unmaintained?
> There even is:
> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> this patchset would have to add:
> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu-cpuinfo
> then.
>
> But:
> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> describes
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/dscr_default
> and
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9]+/dscr
>
> which I have never seen.
>
> Much more important values in there like:
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/topology
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/{online,offline}

They are documented in
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu (which doesn't
contain dscr)

Brice


>
> are not described there at all.
>
> I wonder whether .../cpu/dscr_default still exists in the
> kernel, a quick grep did not reveal anything.
> A
> Source:
> tag would be a nice non-optional addition in the README.
>
> We can also send definitions for topology/microcode/cache/..
> to catch up a bit there again, not sure that makes much sense.
>
> Be aware that the output of /proc/cpuinfo is rather arbitrary
> depending on architecure and some build options.
>
>       Thomas

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web