Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1662055 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-09 09:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-09 10:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Some filesystems set MNT_* flags in superblock->s_flags David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-06-09 09:50 +0200
Re: Some filesystems set MNT_* flags in superblock->s_flags Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-06-09 10:10 +0200
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-09 09:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Some filesystems set MNT_* flags in superblock->s_flags |
| Message-ID | <tQmQb-78W-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> * what the hell is ms_flags thing doing in __vfs_new_sb_config()?
> It's a really vile mix of unrelated flags and operations we had in existing
> mount(2) ABI. With MS_KERNMOUNT thrown into that loo^Wmix. Sure, we need
> to parse the garbage fed to mount(2). And we need to pass that garbage to
> "legacy" types as well, but let's not inflict it upon the new mechanisms.
Hmmm... Some ->remount_fs() operations attempt to alter the MS_* flags that
correspond to MNT_* flags. Coda, for example:
static int coda_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
{
sync_filesystem(sb);
*flags |= MS_NOATIME;
return 0;
}
But this is quashed in do_remount_sb:
sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~MS_RMT_MASK) | (flags & MS_RMT_MASK);
And others set them directly in s_flags, v9fs_fill_super() for example sets
MS_NOATIME:
sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE | MS_DIRSYNC | MS_NOATIME;
I'm guessing things like this should be got rid of, but does there need to be
a way to inform mount() that these should be set on the vfsmount?
David
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-09 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQn9v-7uN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1662055 |
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:48 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> * what the hell is ms_flags thing doing in __vfs_new_sb_config()?
>> It's a really vile mix of unrelated flags and operations we had in existing
>> mount(2) ABI. With MS_KERNMOUNT thrown into that loo^Wmix. Sure, we need
>> to parse the garbage fed to mount(2). And we need to pass that garbage to
>> "legacy" types as well, but let's not inflict it upon the new mechanisms.
>
> Hmmm... Some ->remount_fs() operations attempt to alter the MS_* flags that
> correspond to MNT_* flags. Coda, for example:
>
> static int coda_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> {
> sync_filesystem(sb);
> *flags |= MS_NOATIME;
> return 0;
> }
>
> But this is quashed in do_remount_sb:
>
> sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~MS_RMT_MASK) | (flags & MS_RMT_MASK);
>
> And others set them directly in s_flags, v9fs_fill_super() for example sets
> MS_NOATIME:
>
> sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE | MS_DIRSYNC | MS_NOATIME;
>
> I'm guessing things like this should be got rid of, but does there need to be
> a way to inform mount() that these should be set on the vfsmount?
Looks like MS_NOATIME is used in two *completely* separate roles:
- passed to mount(2) to set MNT_NOATIME
- set on sb->s_flags by filesystem to prevent atime modification
Btw. the second role can also be achieved by setting S_NOATIME on
inode, so this role of MS_NOATIME looks like being superfluous.
Thanks,
Miklos
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web