Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1652068 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> - 2017-05-28 11:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-05-29 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-05-29 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-05-31 21:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-06-01 18:40 +0200

#1652068 — [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
I suggest this trivial patch should be picked individually per susbsystem.

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
index 2a3f3b8946b998..a91920a49433c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 * SHDMA Device Tree bindings
 
-Sh-/r-mobile and r-car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
+Sh-/r-mobile and R-Car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
 instances, capable of serving any of a common set of DMA slave devices, using
 the same configuration. To describe this topology we require all compatible
 SHDMA DT nodes to be placed under a DMA multiplexer node. All such compatible
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1652348

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  * SHDMA Device Tree bindings
>
> -Sh-/r-mobile and r-car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
> +Sh-/r-mobile and R-Car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller

I'd fix "SH/R-Mobile" too, while at it.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1652480

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Geert,

thanks for the Acks.

> I'd fix "SH/R-Mobile" too, while at it.

That would be a seperate tree-wide series in my book.

Regards,

   Wolfram

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1654578

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30:44AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> I suggest this trivial patch should be picked individually per susbsystem.
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1655479

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30:44AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.


Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web