Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642579 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-16 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-18 08:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-16 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-05-18 08:30 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature |
| Message-ID | <tHLup-6H1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:40:44PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > My complaint is mostly about naming.. and "hist_gen_id" might be a > > better name. > > Ah, I also think the name, 'work_id', is not good... and frankly I am > not sure if 'hist_gen_id' is good, either. What about to apply 'rollback', > which I did for locks in irq, into works of workqueues? If you say yes, > I will try to do it. If the rollback thing works, that's fine too. If it gets ugly, stick with something like 'hist_id'.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-18 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tIn6G-68Z-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642579 |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:40:44PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > My complaint is mostly about naming.. and "hist_gen_id" might be a > > > better name. > > > > Ah, I also think the name, 'work_id', is not good... and frankly I am > > not sure if 'hist_gen_id' is good, either. What about to apply 'rollback', > > which I did for locks in irq, into works of workqueues? If you say yes, > > I will try to do it. > > If the rollback thing works, that's fine too. If it gets ugly, stick > with something like 'hist_id'. I really want to implement it with rollback.. But it also needs to introduce new fields to distinguish between works which are all normal process contexts. I will do this with renaming instead of applying rollback. Thank you.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web